TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Iran may develop a clandestine nuclear program outside of arms control commitments and international inspections as a response to Israeli strikes.

Fact Check: Iran may develop a clandestine nuclear program outside of arms control commitments and international inspections as a response to Israeli strikes.

Published June 17, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Iran may develop a clandestine nuclear program outside of arms control commitments and international inspections as a response to Israe...

Fact Check: "Iran may develop a clandestine nuclear program outside of arms control commitments and international inspections as a response to Israeli strikes."

What We Know

Recent events have escalated tensions between Israel and Iran, particularly following a series of Israeli airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. These strikes have reportedly caused significant damage to Iran's nuclear program, potentially delaying its ability to enrich uranium necessary for nuclear weapons. According to the Associated Press, the attacks have set back Iran's nuclear ambitions by months or years, destroying key facilities and killing important military and scientific personnel involved in the program.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has expressed concerns regarding Iran's nuclear activities, stating that the country has enough enriched uranium to produce several nuclear bombs if it chose to do so (New York Times). Iran maintains that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the IAEA has noted that Iran is not complying with its nuclear nonproliferation obligations (New York Times).

Furthermore, experts suggest that the Israeli strikes may provoke Iran to consider developing a clandestine nuclear program outside of international oversight. A report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) indicates that the effectiveness of the Israeli strikes and the international response could influence Iran's future nuclear strategy (CSIS).

Analysis

The claim that Iran may develop a clandestine nuclear program in response to Israeli strikes is grounded in a complex geopolitical context. The Israeli attacks have indeed caused significant damage to Iran's nuclear infrastructure, as noted by experts like David Albright, who indicated that the strikes could delay Iran's nuclear weapon development by about a year (Associated Press).

However, the assertion that Iran will definitely pursue a clandestine program is speculative. While the Foreign Affairs article discusses the potential for Iran to withdraw from arms control commitments and pursue nuclear weapons more aggressively, it does not provide definitive evidence that such actions are imminent. The IAEA's ongoing monitoring and the international community's response will play crucial roles in shaping Iran's decisions regarding its nuclear ambitions.

Moreover, the reliability of sources varies. The Associated Press and CSIS are generally regarded as credible, while the New York Times, despite its reputation, may present narratives that align with specific geopolitical perspectives. The potential for bias exists in reporting on such sensitive topics, particularly regarding national security and military actions.

Conclusion

The claim that "Iran may develop a clandestine nuclear program outside of arms control commitments and international inspections as a response to Israeli strikes" is Partially True. While the Israeli strikes have indeed damaged Iran's nuclear capabilities and may provoke a reconsideration of its nuclear strategy, there is no definitive evidence that Iran will immediately pursue a clandestine program. The situation remains fluid, and Iran's future actions will depend on various factors, including international responses and its own strategic calculations.

Sources

  1. Israeli strikes have delivered a serious blow to Iran's nuclear program ...
  2. Explosions and Buzzing Drones Heard as Israel and Iran ...
  3. Iran attacks Israel in retaliation killing at least 3
  4. Live Updates: Israeli Strikes Wipe Out Iran's Top Military Chain of ...
  5. Iran Is Breaking Rules on Nuclear Activity, U.N. Watchdog Says
  6. What Do the Israeli Strikes Mean for Iran's Nuclear Program? - CSIS
  7. Multiples explosions en Iran il y a une heure - JForum
  8. The Real Threat From Iran: Tehran's Most Dangerous Option for ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Iran's nuclear program is purely peaceful and not aimed at building atomic weapons.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Iran's nuclear program is purely peaceful and not aimed at building atomic weapons.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Iran's nuclear program is purely peaceful and not aimed at building atomic weapons.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 2 nuclear sites in Iran damaged but not obliterated
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: 2 nuclear sites in Iran damaged but not obliterated

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 2 nuclear sites in Iran damaged but not obliterated

Jul 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran, sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani.
Partially True

Fact Check: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran, sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran, sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani.

Jul 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Iran is racing to build a nuclear weapon.
Partially True

Fact Check: Iran is racing to build a nuclear weapon.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Iran is racing to build a nuclear weapon.

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Iran was using the Fordo facility to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons.
Partially True

Fact Check: Iran was using the Fordo facility to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Iran was using the Fordo facility to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons.

Jul 8, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks