TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful despite Israeli attacks.

Fact Check: Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful despite Israeli attacks.

Published June 20, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful despite Israeli attacks." ## What We Know Iran has consistently maintained that its nucle...

Fact Check: "Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful despite Israeli attacks."

What We Know

Iran has consistently maintained that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, primarily aimed at energy production and medical research. Following a series of Israeli airstrikes targeting Iran's nuclear facilities, Iranian officials reiterated this stance. For instance, Iran's government spokesperson stated that the nuclear program is "only for peaceful purposes" and condemned the Israeli attacks as violations of international law (source-2, source-6).

The Israeli strikes, which occurred on June 13, 2025, were aimed at crippling Iran's ability to enrich uranium, a process critical for developing nuclear weapons. Reports indicate that these attacks resulted in significant damage to facilities involved in uranium enrichment (source-1, source-3). Despite this, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has noted that Iran possesses enough enriched uranium to potentially create several nuclear bombs, raising concerns about the true nature of its nuclear ambitions (source-1).

Analysis

The claim that Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful is supported by multiple credible sources. Iranian officials have publicly stated that their nuclear activities are intended for non-military purposes, which aligns with their long-standing narrative (source-2, source-4).

However, the context of the Israeli attacks complicates this narrative. The strikes were described as a preemptive measure against what Israel perceives as an imminent threat from Iran's nuclear capabilities (source-3). Experts have indicated that while the attacks caused significant damage, much of Iran's nuclear infrastructure remains intact, suggesting that the program could continue despite the strikes (source-5).

The reliability of the sources discussing Iran's claims is generally high, as they include statements from government officials and reports from established news organizations. However, it is important to note that Iranian state media may present a biased perspective, emphasizing the peaceful nature of their program while downplaying any military implications.

Conclusion

The claim that "Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful despite Israeli attacks" is True. Iran has consistently communicated that its nuclear efforts are aimed at peaceful objectives, even in the face of military actions from Israel that target its nuclear facilities. While the international community remains skeptical about the true intentions of Iran's nuclear program, particularly given the enriched uranium levels reported by the IAEA, the assertion itself reflects Iran's official stance.

Sources

  1. Israeli strikes have delivered a serious blow to Iran's nuclear program ...
  2. Iran says no to nuclear talks during conflict as UN urges ...
  3. Israel launches 'preemptive strikes' on Iran nuclear program : NPR
  4. UN's Guterres urges 'give peace a chance' in Israel-Iran ...
  5. Much of Iran's Nuclear Program Remains After Israel's Strikes. At Least ...
  6. Iran will consider diplomacy when aggression stops ...
  7. Keemokazi Shorts - YouTube
  8. What To Know About Iran's Nuclear Program After Israel's Strikes

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Iran's nuclear program is purely peaceful and not aimed at building atomic weapons.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Iran's nuclear program is purely peaceful and not aimed at building atomic weapons.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Iran's nuclear program is purely peaceful and not aimed at building atomic weapons.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Tulsa Gabbana testified that Iran was not building a nuclear bomb
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Tulsa Gabbana testified that Iran was not building a nuclear bomb

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Tulsa Gabbana testified that Iran was not building a nuclear bomb

Jul 25, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 2 nuclear sites in Iran damaged but not obliterated
Partially True

Fact Check: 2 nuclear sites in Iran damaged but not obliterated

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 2 nuclear sites in Iran damaged but not obliterated

Jul 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran. In the process, he sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani, Iran's lead nuclear negotiator."
False

Fact Check: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran. In the process, he sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani, Iran's lead nuclear negotiator."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran. In the process, he sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani, Iran's lead nuclear negotiator."

Jul 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran, sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani.
Partially True

Fact Check: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran, sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran, sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani.

Jul 22, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks