TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Iran has nuclear facilities for uranium enrichment.

Fact Check: Iran has nuclear facilities for uranium enrichment.

Published June 30, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Iran has nuclear facilities for uranium enrichment." ## What We Know Iran operates several nuclear facilities, including those specifi...

Fact Check: "Iran has nuclear facilities for uranium enrichment."

What We Know

Iran operates several nuclear facilities, including those specifically designed for uranium enrichment. The most notable sites include Fordow and Natanz. Fordow, which is heavily fortified and located deep underground, has been used to enrich uranium to near weapons-grade levels (NPR). Natanz has also been a primary site for uranium enrichment, with its centrifuges moved underground to protect them from potential attacks (NPR).

In recent developments, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that Iran resumed enrichment activities at Fordow in 2021 and had amassed enough 60%-enriched uranium that could potentially be used to produce nuclear weapons (BBC). This indicates that Iran not only possesses the facilities but is actively using them to enrich uranium.

Analysis

The claim that Iran has nuclear facilities for uranium enrichment is supported by multiple credible sources. The NPR report details the operational status of Iran's nuclear facilities, emphasizing that Fordow and Natanz are central to Iran's enrichment efforts (NPR). Furthermore, the IAEA's findings corroborate this, indicating that Iran has accumulated significant quantities of enriched uranium, which raises concerns about its potential to develop nuclear weapons (BBC).

The reliability of these sources is high. NPR is a well-established news organization known for its rigorous reporting standards, while the IAEA is an authoritative body in nuclear oversight. The BBC also provides reliable news coverage and has a reputation for fact-checking and journalistic integrity.

However, it is essential to consider the context of these reports. The geopolitical tensions surrounding Iran's nuclear program often lead to varying interpretations of the data. For instance, while some reports emphasize the potential for weaponization, others may focus on Iran's claims of peaceful nuclear energy development. Nonetheless, the evidence clearly supports the existence of facilities dedicated to uranium enrichment.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that Iran has nuclear facilities for uranium enrichment is true. Multiple credible sources confirm the existence and operational status of these facilities, particularly Fordow and Natanz, which are actively used for enriching uranium. The ongoing activities at these sites, as reported by the IAEA and other news organizations, underscore Iran's capability to produce nuclear material that could be used for weapons.

Sources

  1. U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites set up "cat-and-mouse" hunt ...
  2. Obliterated? Damaged? Inoperable? What's known about ...
  3. Nuclear facilities in Iran
  4. Iran could start enriching uranium for bomb within months, ...
  5. L’Iran dévoile une « ville de missiles » souterraine (vidéo)
  6. L’écrasement des Houthis par les USA un avertissement à l’Iran
  7. La guerre Iran-Israël et ses implications (Analyse) - JForum
  8. Satellite imagery reveals ongoing work at Iranian nuclear ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Iran was using the Fordo facility to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Iran was using the Fordo facility to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Iran was using the Fordo facility to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons.

Jul 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Tulsa Gabbana testified that Iran was not building a nuclear bomb
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Tulsa Gabbana testified that Iran was not building a nuclear bomb

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Tulsa Gabbana testified that Iran was not building a nuclear bomb

Jul 25, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 2 nuclear sites in Iran damaged but not obliterated
Partially True

Fact Check: 2 nuclear sites in Iran damaged but not obliterated

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 2 nuclear sites in Iran damaged but not obliterated

Jul 25, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran. In the process, he sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani, Iran's lead nuclear negotiator."
False

Fact Check: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran. In the process, he sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani, Iran's lead nuclear negotiator."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran. In the process, he sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani, Iran's lead nuclear negotiator."

Jul 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran, sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani.
Partially True

Fact Check: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran, sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "Netanyahu began this war with his attack on Iran, sabotaged US-Iran negotiations on nuclear issues and assassinated Ali Shamkhani.

Jul 22, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks