TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Investors flock to safe-haven assets amid war tensions

Fact Check: Investors flock to safe-haven assets amid war tensions

Published June 20, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "Investors flock to safe-haven assets amid war tensions" ## What We Know The claim that "investors flock to safe-haven assets amid war ...

Fact Check: "Investors flock to safe-haven assets amid war tensions"

What We Know

The claim that "investors flock to safe-haven assets amid war tensions" is supported by various reports indicating a trend in financial markets during periods of geopolitical instability. For instance, following the recent escalation of violence in Israel, there was a notable increase in the appeal of safe-haven assets such as gold and U.S. Treasuries. According to Reuters, the conflict has prompted investors to seek refuge in these assets, leading to a rise in gold prices by over 3% in a week, marking its best performance since March 2023. Similarly, another report from Reuters highlighted that the intensifying conflict has led to significant inflows into safe-haven investments, reflecting a broader trend where investors typically react to geopolitical tensions by reallocating their portfolios towards less risky assets.

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim is compelling, particularly in the context of recent events in the Middle East. The reports from Reuters and Reuters provide timely and relevant data regarding market reactions to the conflict, showcasing a clear pattern of investor behavior during crises. These sources are reputable and well-regarded in financial journalism, which adds to their credibility.

However, while the immediate reaction of investors can be observed, the long-term implications of such behavior require further investigation. For example, the UBS report indicates that while safe-haven assets have seen increased interest, the stability of these investments can fluctuate based on ongoing developments in the conflict. Additionally, the broader economic context, including interest rates and inflation, can also influence investor decisions, complicating the narrative that simply equates war tensions with a flight to safety.

Moreover, the claim does not specify the types of safe-haven assets being referred to, which can vary widely. While gold and U.S. Treasuries are commonly recognized as safe havens, other assets like certain currencies (e.g., the Swiss Franc) or even specific stocks may also be considered safe during turbulent times. This ambiguity in the claim necessitates a more nuanced understanding of what "safe-haven assets" entails.

Conclusion

Needs Research: While there is substantial evidence indicating that investors are indeed moving towards safe-haven assets in response to war tensions, the claim requires further exploration to understand the nuances of this behavior. The immediate market reactions are clear, but the long-term trends and the specific types of assets involved need more comprehensive analysis. Additionally, the influence of other economic factors on investor behavior during such crises should be considered to provide a complete picture.

Sources

  1. Diplome.gouv.fr : attestations de diplômes en ligne
  2. Présentation du baccalauréat général | éduscol | Ministère de l ...
  3. Les différents baccalauréats | Ministère de l'Education Nationale, …
  4. Attack on Israel boosts appeal of gold, safe-haven assets
  5. Baccalauréat en France — Wikipédia
  6. Safe-haven gold rallies over 3% as Middle East conflict intensifies
  7. Investors on edge as Middle East conflict intensifies
  8. Safe-haven assets in focus as Israel-Hamas war continues

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Middle East war triggers massive shift to safe-haven assets
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Middle East war triggers massive shift to safe-haven assets

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Middle East war triggers massive shift to safe-haven assets

Jun 19, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Stocks plummet as Middle East war ignites safe-haven trading frenzy
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Stocks plummet as Middle East war ignites safe-haven trading frenzy

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Stocks plummet as Middle East war ignites safe-haven trading frenzy

Jun 19, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Mar 24, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Middle East tensions soar as US sends military assets to the region.
True

Fact Check: Middle East tensions soar as US sends military assets to the region.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Middle East tensions soar as US sends military assets to the region.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The incident was revealed by a website called 404 Media, which reported that the Texas sheriff sent a nationwide request for data from 83,000 cameras operated by the private company Flock Safety.
Needs Research

Fact Check: The incident was revealed by a website called 404 Media, which reported that the Texas sheriff sent a nationwide request for data from 83,000 cameras operated by the private company Flock Safety.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The incident was revealed by a website called 404 Media, which reported that the Texas sheriff sent a nationwide request for data from 83,000 cameras operated by the private company Flock Safety.

Jun 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Jones continues to broadcast while his assets are tied up in court.
Needs Research

Fact Check: Jones continues to broadcast while his assets are tied up in court.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Jones continues to broadcast while his assets are tied up in court.

Jun 18, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Investors flock to safe-haven assets amid war tensions | TruthOrFake Blog