Fact Check: "ICE's masked agents compared to Gestapo by US Congressman."
What We Know
In a recent commencement speech at the University of Minnesota's law school, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz (D) referred to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents as a "modern-day Gestapo." This statement drew significant attention and condemnation from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which stated that it is "absolutely sickening to compare ICE law enforcement agents to the Gestapo" (HuffPost). The DHS emphasized that such comparisons are harmful and misrepresent the role of ICE agents, who they claim operate under lawful authority to enforce immigration laws.
The term "Gestapo" refers to the secret police of Nazi Germany, known for their brutal tactics and human rights abuses. Walz's comments highlighted concerns about ICE's practices, particularly the use of masked agents and unmarked vehicles during arrests, which he argued resemble oppressive tactics used by totalitarian regimes (The Hill). He criticized the lack of due process for individuals apprehended by ICE, stating that many are taken without a chance to defend themselves or even say goodbye to loved ones.
Analysis
The claim that ICE agents were compared to the Gestapo is true, as it was explicitly stated by Governor Walz during his speech. The DHS's response to Walz's comments reflects a broader debate about the role and methods of ICE in immigration enforcement. Critics of ICE argue that the agency's tactics can be perceived as oppressive, particularly in marginalized communities, while supporters argue that ICE is necessary for maintaining law and order (County Local News).
The reliability of the sources involved in this discussion varies. The DHS's statement is an official response from a government agency, which lends it a level of authority, although it may also reflect a defensive posture against criticism. On the other hand, Walz's comments are rooted in his political stance and reflect a growing concern among some lawmakers and advocacy groups about the methods employed by ICE. The historical comparison to the Gestapo, while provocative, is contentious and can detract from constructive discussions about immigration policy and enforcement practices.
In evaluating the credibility of the sources, the DHS's official statements are generally considered reliable, though they may carry an inherent bias in defending the agency's actions. Conversely, media reports like those from HuffPost and The Hill provide context and analysis but may also reflect the editorial slant of their respective outlets.
Conclusion
The claim that ICE's masked agents were compared to the Gestapo by U.S. Congressman Tim Walz is True. The statement was made during a public address and has been confirmed by multiple credible sources. The ensuing debate highlights significant concerns regarding immigration enforcement practices and the rhetoric surrounding them, illustrating the polarized views on this issue.
