Fact Check: "https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/alina-chan-covid-lab-leak-theory/" True or fake.

Fact Check: "https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/alina-chan-covid-lab-leak-theory/" True or fake.

Published May 7, 2025
VERDICT
Mostly True

# The Claim: "True or fake" regarding Alina Chan's statements on the COVID lab leak theory ## Introduction The claim in question revolves around a re...

The Claim: "True or fake" regarding Alina Chan's statements on the COVID lab leak theory

Introduction

The claim in question revolves around a recent statement made by Alina Chan, a scientist affiliated with both MIT and Harvard, who has been vocal about the need to investigate the lab leak theory as a plausible origin of COVID-19. Chan asserts that the lab leak theory is no longer merely a conspiracy theory but a valid hypothesis that warrants serious investigation. This claim has sparked discussions and debates about the origins of the virus and the credibility of the lab leak theory itself.

What We Know

  1. Alina Chan's Position: Alina Chan has been an advocate for investigating the lab leak theory, stating that it is a "totally plausible path" for the emergence of COVID-19 and should be thoroughly examined 1.

  2. Department of Energy's Assessment: A classified report from the U.S. Department of Energy recently concluded with "low confidence" that the COVID-19 pandemic likely originated from a laboratory leak in Wuhan, China 28.

  3. Intelligence Community's Views: The U.S. intelligence community has been divided on the origins of COVID-19. Some agencies, including the CIA, have indicated that the lab leak theory is the only one supported by a combination of scientific evidence and intelligence assessments 4.

  4. WHO's Stance: The World Health Organization (WHO) has expressed openness to investigating new evidence regarding the lab leak theory, although it has faced criticism for its previous investigations into the origins of COVID-19 7.

  5. Criticism of Chan's Advocacy: Chan has faced backlash from some scientists who argue that there is insufficient evidence to support the lab leak theory, asserting that both natural and lab origins remain unproven 5.

Analysis

The credibility of the claim that the lab leak theory is a plausible origin for COVID-19 is supported by some recent assessments from reputable sources, such as the U.S. Department of Energy and various intelligence agencies. However, these assessments come with a caveat of "low confidence," which suggests that while the theory is considered plausible, it is not definitively proven.

Source Evaluation

  • CBS News: The articles referenced from CBS News provide a range of perspectives on the lab leak theory and Chan's advocacy. CBS is generally regarded as a reliable news source, but it is important to note that media outlets can sometimes exhibit bias in their reporting. The framing of the lab leak theory as a "conspiracy theory" in earlier reports may have influenced public perception, although recent articles seem to adopt a more neutral tone 1248.

  • Scientific Community: The scientific community remains divided on the origins of COVID-19. Chan's advocacy is supported by some researchers who believe that the lab leak theory deserves further investigation, while others argue that there is no conclusive evidence for either a natural or lab-based origin 5. This division highlights the complexity of the issue and the need for more comprehensive research.

  • Government Agencies: The assessments from government agencies like the Department of Energy and CIA are significant, as they are based on intelligence and scientific analysis. However, the "low confidence" rating indicates that these conclusions are not definitive and should be interpreted with caution 248.

Conflicts of Interest

Alina Chan's position as a researcher affiliated with prestigious institutions may lend her credibility, but it is also essential to consider potential biases. Her strong advocacy for the lab leak theory could be influenced by her professional interests in virology and biosecurity. Additionally, the political context surrounding the lab leak theory, particularly in relation to U.S.-China relations, may introduce further complexities and biases into the discussion.

What Additional Information Would Be Helpful

To further evaluate the claim, additional information that could be beneficial includes:

  • More detailed scientific studies or reports that provide evidence supporting or refuting the lab leak theory.
  • Insights from independent experts in virology and epidemiology who can assess the validity of the evidence presented by both sides.
  • Access to the classified reports from the Department of Energy and other intelligence agencies to understand the basis of their conclusions.

Conclusion

Verdict: Mostly True

The claim that the lab leak theory is a plausible origin for COVID-19 is supported by assessments from credible sources, including the U.S. Department of Energy and various intelligence agencies. These sources suggest that while the lab leak theory is considered a valid hypothesis, the confidence in this conclusion remains low, indicating that it is not definitively proven.

It is important to recognize the nuances surrounding this topic; the scientific community is divided, with some experts advocating for further investigation into the lab leak theory, while others maintain that there is insufficient evidence to support it. This division highlights the complexity of the issue and the ongoing need for comprehensive research.

Moreover, the limitations of the available evidence must be acknowledged. The "low confidence" rating from the Department of Energy and the varied opinions within the intelligence community suggest that while the lab leak theory is plausible, it is still an open question that requires further exploration.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the information presented and consider the broader context of the ongoing debate regarding the origins of COVID-19.

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Aug 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Gifted individuals thrives in true democratic democracies.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Gifted individuals thrives in true democratic democracies.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Gifted individuals thrives in true democratic democracies.

Aug 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is it true the who wants control of the world
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Is it true the who wants control of the world

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is it true the who wants control of the world

Aug 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Commu and socialism true difference things
Unverified

Fact Check: Commu and socialism true difference things

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Commu and socialism true difference things

Aug 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Soviet Union wasn’t true communism
Partially True

Fact Check: The Soviet Union wasn’t true communism

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Soviet Union wasn’t true communism

Aug 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is it true that no Canadian child has died in a mass shooting event at school
True

Fact Check: Is it true that no Canadian child has died in a mass shooting event at school

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is it true that no Canadian child has died in a mass shooting event at school

Aug 1, 2025
Read more →