Fact Check: Hostages defended their captors during the infamous 1973 bank siege.

Fact Check: Hostages defended their captors during the infamous 1973 bank siege.

Published June 28, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: Hostages Defended Their Captors During the Infamous 1973 Bank Siege ## What We Know The claim that hostages defended their captors duri...

Fact Check: Hostages Defended Their Captors During the Infamous 1973 Bank Siege

What We Know

The claim that hostages defended their captors during the 1973 Norrmalmstorg robbery in Stockholm, Sweden, is supported by multiple sources. The incident involved Jan-Erik Olsson, who took four hostages during a bank robbery, and Clark Olofsson, a criminal brought in to assist in negotiations. Reports indicate that the hostages, particularly Kristin Enmark, expressed sympathy towards their captors and even defended their actions during negotiations with authorities. Enmark stated, "I fully trust Clark and the robber... They haven't done a thing to us" and described the situation as having been "very nice" despite the circumstances (source-2, source-4).

The term "Stockholm syndrome" was coined in the aftermath of this event to describe the psychological phenomenon where hostages develop feelings of affection for their captors (source-1). The hostages' refusal to cooperate with police and their defense of Olsson and Olofsson during the crisis are well-documented, leading to significant academic and public interest in the case (source-1, source-3).

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim is robust, with multiple credible sources affirming that hostages did indeed defend their captors. The BBC reported that during the six-day siege, hostages began to sympathize with Olsson and Olofsson, growing increasingly hostile towards the police (source-2). This aligns with the historical accounts that highlight the psychological dynamics at play during the hostage situation.

Furthermore, the academic interest surrounding the incident, particularly the development of the term "Stockholm syndrome," underscores the significance of the hostages' behavior. The hostages' actions are not merely anecdotal; they have been analyzed in psychological contexts, suggesting that their responses were complex and influenced by fear and a desire for survival (source-4).

While some narratives suggest that the hostages' actions were driven by a distrust of police rather than genuine affection for their captors, the overall consensus remains that there was a notable bond formed during the crisis (source-1). This complexity adds depth to the understanding of the psychological phenomena observed in hostage situations.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that hostages defended their captors during the 1973 Norrmalmstorg robbery is true. The evidence from multiple credible sources demonstrates that hostages expressed sympathy for Olsson and Olofsson, actively defended their actions, and even communicated their trust in them during negotiations with authorities. This behavior has been foundational in the study of psychological responses in hostage situations, leading to the establishment of the term "Stockholm syndrome."

Sources

  1. Norrmalmstorg robbery
  2. Clark Olofsson: Criminal who helped inspire Stockholm syndrome theory dies
  3. Stockholm syndrome
  4. Stockholm Syndrome: The True Story of Hostages Loyal to Their Captor

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...