TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Hilary Clinton was not allowed to keep a $425 necklace when she was secretary of state

Fact Check: Hilary Clinton was not allowed to keep a $425 necklace when she was secretary of state

Published May 13, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Claim Analysis: "Hillary Clinton was not allowed to keep a $425 necklace when she was Secretary of State" ## 1. Introduction The claim under scruti...

Claim Analysis: "Hillary Clinton was not allowed to keep a $425 necklace when she was Secretary of State"

1. Introduction

The claim under scrutiny is that Hillary Clinton was not permitted to keep a $425 necklace that was gifted to her during her tenure as Secretary of State. This assertion raises questions about the protocols surrounding gifts received by government officials and the specific circumstances of this particular necklace.

2. What We Know

Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013. During this time, U.S. officials were subject to strict regulations regarding the acceptance of gifts from foreign dignitaries. According to the Federal Register, gifts received by federal employees from foreign government sources must be reported and are often transferred to the General Services Administration (GSA) if they exceed a certain value 2.

A specific instance involving a necklace valued at $425 is noted in the Federal Register, where it is recorded as a gift received from the Ambassador of Bangladesh 2. However, the disposition of this necklace is listed as "pending transfer to General Services Administration," suggesting that it was not retained by Clinton.

Additionally, reports from various sources indicate that Clinton received multiple gifts during her time as Secretary of State, some of which were notably more valuable than the necklace in question 37.

3. Analysis

The primary source of information regarding the necklace is the Federal Register, which is a reliable government document that records the gifts received by federal employees. However, while it confirms the receipt of the necklace, it does not provide detailed context on why Clinton was not allowed to keep it. The phrase "pending transfer" indicates compliance with federal regulations, but it does not clarify the specific reasons behind the decision.

The Washington Post article discusses the broader context of gifts received by Clinton, noting that her collection included several lavish items, which may suggest a pattern of compliance with gift regulations 3. However, this article does not specifically address the necklace in question.

Sources like Democratic Underground and Threads provide anecdotal accounts of the necklace but lack verifiable details or citations to authoritative sources 568. These platforms often host discussions that may reflect biases or opinions rather than factual reporting.

The reliability of the sources varies. The Federal Register is a primary source and is considered highly credible. In contrast, platforms like Democratic Underground and Threads may have a more subjective viewpoint and are less reliable for factual claims.

4. Conclusion

Verdict: True

The evidence supports the claim that Hillary Clinton was not allowed to keep a $425 necklace gifted to her during her time as Secretary of State. The Federal Register confirms that the necklace was received from the Ambassador of Bangladesh and indicates that its status was "pending transfer to General Services Administration," which aligns with federal regulations regarding gifts to government officials.

However, it is important to note that while the Federal Register serves as a credible source, it does not provide detailed explanations for the transfer process or the specific reasons Clinton could not retain the necklace. The broader context of gift regulations suggests compliance, but the lack of detailed information leaves some questions unanswered.

Readers should also be aware that while this claim is substantiated by reliable sources, the nuances of gift acceptance and transfer processes can vary, and the absence of comprehensive details limits the full understanding of the situation. As always, it is advisable for readers to critically evaluate information and consider multiple perspectives when assessing claims.

5. Sources

  1. The Evolution of Hillary Clinton: A Style and Image Makeover. Link
  2. Federal Register :: Office of the Chief of Protocol; Gifts to Federal Employees from Foreign Government Sources Reported. Link
  3. Hillary Clinton’s gifts from foreign leaders more lavish than those for Obama - The Washington Post. Link
  4. Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State - Wikipedia. Link
  5. Hillary Clinton was not allowed to keep a $425 necklace gifted to her. Link
  6. “Hillary Clinton wasn't allowed to keep a $425 necklace ... Link
  7. Hillary’s $500K Saudi jewelry - The Hill. Link
  8. Hillary Clinton was gifted a $425 necklace ... Link
  9. I'm old enough to remember when Hillary Clinton was ... Link
  10. Madam Secretary's Elizabeth Wears Hillary Clinton Necklace. Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
🔍
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Jeffrey Epstein, seen as a friend of President Trump and former President Clinton, first faced sex crime charges related to underage girls in 2006 and 2007. Despite facing possible life imprisonment, prosecutor Alex Acosta, now Trump's Labor Secretary, struck a lenient plea deal, resulting in Epstein serving only months in a county jail for those charges. Prosecutors said they seized scores of photos of fully or partially nude girls connected to Epstein's trafficking ring.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Jeffrey Epstein, seen as a friend of President Trump and former President Clinton, first faced sex crime charges related to underage girls in 2006 and 2007. Despite facing possible life imprisonment, prosecutor Alex Acosta, now Trump's Labor Secretary, struck a lenient plea deal, resulting in Epstein serving only months in a county jail for those charges. Prosecutors said they seized scores of photos of fully or partially nude girls connected to Epstein's trafficking ring.

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: There are high-level DNC Emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's quote psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness and that then Secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: There are high-level DNC Emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's quote psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness and that then Secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There are high-level DNC Emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's quote psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness and that then Secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers

Aug 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: "Russian Collusion hoax" was treasonous, orchestrated by the Obama administration and deep-state actors to overthrow Trump, and calls for legal prosecution of Obama, Clinton, and others.
False

Fact Check: "Russian Collusion hoax" was treasonous, orchestrated by the Obama administration and deep-state actors to overthrow Trump, and calls for legal prosecution of Obama, Clinton, and others.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "Russian Collusion hoax" was treasonous, orchestrated by the Obama administration and deep-state actors to overthrow Trump, and calls for legal prosecution of Obama, Clinton, and others.

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Did Hilary Clinton provide uranium to Iran?
False

Fact Check: Did Hilary Clinton provide uranium to Iran?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Did Hilary Clinton provide uranium to Iran?

Jun 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Hilary Clinton eats children that she has stashed in her basement.
False

Fact Check: Hilary Clinton eats children that she has stashed in her basement.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Hilary Clinton eats children that she has stashed in her basement.

Mar 12, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks