Fact Check: Hilary Clinton was not allowed to keep a $425 necklace when she was secretary of state

Fact Check: Hilary Clinton was not allowed to keep a $425 necklace when she was secretary of state

May 13, 2025by TruthOrFake AI
VERDICT
True

Claim Analysis: "Hillary Clinton was not allowed to keep a $425 necklace when she was Secretary of State"

1. Introduction

The claim under scrutiny is that Hillary Clinton was not permitted to keep a $425 necklace that was gifted to her during her tenure as Secretary of State. This assertion raises questions about the protocols surrounding gifts received by government officials and the specific circumstances of this particular necklace.

2. What We Know

Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013. During this time, U.S. officials were subject to strict regulations regarding the acceptance of gifts from foreign dignitaries. According to the Federal Register, gifts received by federal employees from foreign government sources must be reported and are often transferred to the General Services Administration (GSA) if they exceed a certain value 2.

A specific instance involving a necklace valued at $425 is noted in the Federal Register, where it is recorded as a gift received from the Ambassador of Bangladesh 2. However, the disposition of this necklace is listed as "pending transfer to General Services Administration," suggesting that it was not retained by Clinton.

Additionally, reports from various sources indicate that Clinton received multiple gifts during her time as Secretary of State, some of which were notably more valuable than the necklace in question 37.

3. Analysis

The primary source of information regarding the necklace is the Federal Register, which is a reliable government document that records the gifts received by federal employees. However, while it confirms the receipt of the necklace, it does not provide detailed context on why Clinton was not allowed to keep it. The phrase "pending transfer" indicates compliance with federal regulations, but it does not clarify the specific reasons behind the decision.

The Washington Post article discusses the broader context of gifts received by Clinton, noting that her collection included several lavish items, which may suggest a pattern of compliance with gift regulations 3. However, this article does not specifically address the necklace in question.

Sources like Democratic Underground and Threads provide anecdotal accounts of the necklace but lack verifiable details or citations to authoritative sources 568. These platforms often host discussions that may reflect biases or opinions rather than factual reporting.

The reliability of the sources varies. The Federal Register is a primary source and is considered highly credible. In contrast, platforms like Democratic Underground and Threads may have a more subjective viewpoint and are less reliable for factual claims.

4. Conclusion

Verdict: True

The evidence supports the claim that Hillary Clinton was not allowed to keep a $425 necklace gifted to her during her time as Secretary of State. The Federal Register confirms that the necklace was received from the Ambassador of Bangladesh and indicates that its status was "pending transfer to General Services Administration," which aligns with federal regulations regarding gifts to government officials.

However, it is important to note that while the Federal Register serves as a credible source, it does not provide detailed explanations for the transfer process or the specific reasons Clinton could not retain the necklace. The broader context of gift regulations suggests compliance, but the lack of detailed information leaves some questions unanswered.

Readers should also be aware that while this claim is substantiated by reliable sources, the nuances of gift acceptance and transfer processes can vary, and the absence of comprehensive details limits the full understanding of the situation. As always, it is advisable for readers to critically evaluate information and consider multiple perspectives when assessing claims.

5. Sources

  1. The Evolution of Hillary Clinton: A Style and Image Makeover. Link
  2. Federal Register :: Office of the Chief of Protocol; Gifts to Federal Employees from Foreign Government Sources Reported. Link
  3. Hillary Clinton’s gifts from foreign leaders more lavish than those for Obama - The Washington Post. Link
  4. Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State - Wikipedia. Link
  5. Hillary Clinton was not allowed to keep a $425 necklace gifted to her. Link
  6. “Hillary Clinton wasn't allowed to keep a $425 necklace ... Link
  7. Hillary’s $500K Saudi jewelry - The Hill. Link
  8. Hillary Clinton was gifted a $425 necklace ... Link
  9. I'm old enough to remember when Hillary Clinton was ... Link
  10. Madam Secretary's Elizabeth Wears Hillary Clinton Necklace. Link

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

Have a claim you want to verify?

Have a claim you want to verify?

Our AI-powered fact-checker can analyze any claim against reliable sources and provide you with an evidence-based verdict.

Fact Check: Hilary Clinton was not allowed to keep a $425 necklace when she was secretary of state | TruthOrFake Blog