Fact Check: Hate speech on X surged despite unchanged spam rules

Fact Check: Hate speech on X surged despite unchanged spam rules

Published June 19, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Hate speech on X surged despite unchanged spam rules" ## What We Know The claim that "hate speech on X surged despite unchanged spam r...

Fact Check: "Hate speech on X surged despite unchanged spam rules"

What We Know

The claim that "hate speech on X surged despite unchanged spam rules" has been supported by various reports and analyses. A study conducted by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, found that weekly rates of hate speech on the platform X (formerly Twitter) rose approximately 50% in the months following Elon Musk's acquisition in October 2022 (source-1). This increase has been attributed to Musk's significant changes to the platform's content moderation policies, which included dismantling the Trust and Safety advisory group and reducing the enforcement of existing rules regarding hate speech (source-2).

Despite the rise in hate speech, the rules governing spam on the platform have reportedly remained unchanged, leading to a perception that the increase in hate speech is not due to any new spam policies but rather a lack of enforcement of existing guidelines (source-3).

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim is compelling, particularly given the documented increase in hate speech on X and the context of policy changes under Musk's leadership. The report from Berkeley indicates a clear spike in hate speech, which aligns with observations from various watchdog organizations that have noted a rise in hate and harassment on the platform since Musk's takeover (source-1).

However, it is important to consider the reliability of the sources. The Berkeley study is based on empirical data, which lends it credibility. On the other hand, the claims made by X regarding unchanged spam rules are less transparent, as they do not provide specific metrics or data to substantiate their assertions (source-2).

Moreover, the lawsuit filed by X against New York state regarding content moderation laws suggests a defensive posture by the company, indicating that they may be aware of the scrutiny they are under concerning hate speech and content moderation practices (source-3). This context adds a layer of complexity to the analysis, as it suggests that X may be attempting to mitigate the impact of negative public perception regarding its handling of hate speech.

Conclusion

The claim that "hate speech on X surged despite unchanged spam rules" is Partially True. While there is substantial evidence indicating a significant increase in hate speech on the platform following Musk's acquisition, the assertion regarding unchanged spam rules lacks detailed substantiation. The context of reduced enforcement of existing rules appears to be a more significant factor in the rise of hate speech than any changes to spam policies. Therefore, while the claim holds merit, it is essential to recognize the nuances involved.

Sources

  1. Study finds persistent spike in hate speech on X - Berkeley News
  2. Musk's X sues New York over social media hate speech law - BBC News
  3. Musk's X sues New York over content moderation reporting - AP News
  4. Twitter under Elon Musk - Wikipedia
  5. Hate speech on X increased by 50 percent under Elon Musk’s leadership - Independent

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The kind of masculine energy, I think, is good. Having a culture that celebrates the aggression a bit more has its own merits. That was Mark Zuckerberg speaking on the Joe Rogan podcast in January. The Meta CEO made these comments just as his company was announcing sweeping policy changes, from unwinding its hate speech rules, to rolling back diversity efforts, to breaking up its civil rights team, to ending the fact-checking program that infuriated President Donald Trump during his first term in office. The speed and scope of these moves gave many onlookers a sense of whiplash. So we spoke to more than 50 people about Mark Zuckerberg's politics and his tumultuous relationship to Washington over the years to find out what's up.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The kind of masculine energy, I think, is good. Having a culture that celebrates the aggression a bit more has its own merits. That was Mark Zuckerberg speaking on the Joe Rogan podcast in January. The Meta CEO made these comments just as his company was announcing sweeping policy changes, from unwinding its hate speech rules, to rolling back diversity efforts, to breaking up its civil rights team, to ending the fact-checking program that infuriated President Donald Trump during his first term in office. The speed and scope of these moves gave many onlookers a sense of whiplash. So we spoke to more than 50 people about Mark Zuckerberg's politics and his tumultuous relationship to Washington over the years to find out what's up.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The kind of masculine energy, I think, is good. Having a culture that celebrates the aggression a bit more has its own merits. That was Mark Zuckerberg speaking on the Joe Rogan podcast in January. The Meta CEO made these comments just as his company was announcing sweeping policy changes, from unwinding its hate speech rules, to rolling back diversity efforts, to breaking up its civil rights team, to ending the fact-checking program that infuriated President Donald Trump during his first term in office. The speed and scope of these moves gave many onlookers a sense of whiplash. So we spoke to more than 50 people about Mark Zuckerberg's politics and his tumultuous relationship to Washington over the years to find out what's up.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Hate speech is defined as speech that incites violence or prejudicial action.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Hate speech is defined as speech that incites violence or prejudicial action.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Hate speech is defined as speech that incites violence or prejudicial action.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Large Language Models can promote antisemitism and hate speech.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Large Language Models can promote antisemitism and hate speech.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Large Language Models can promote antisemitism and hate speech.

Jul 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Racial slurs are considered hate speech in many countries.
True

Fact Check: Racial slurs are considered hate speech in many countries.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Racial slurs are considered hate speech in many countries.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Hate speech laws vary significantly between countries.
True

Fact Check: Hate speech laws vary significantly between countries.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Hate speech laws vary significantly between countries.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Hate speech can lead to legal consequences in many countries.
Unverified

Fact Check: Hate speech can lead to legal consequences in many countries.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Hate speech can lead to legal consequences in many countries.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Hate speech on X surged despite unchanged spam rules | TruthOrFake Blog