Fact Check: Hate speech on X surged despite unchanged spam rules.

Fact Check: Hate speech on X surged despite unchanged spam rules.

Published June 19, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Hate speech on X surged despite unchanged spam rules." ## What We Know A recent study published in PLOS ONE analyzed English-language ...

Fact Check: "Hate speech on X surged despite unchanged spam rules."

What We Know

A recent study published in PLOS ONE analyzed English-language posts on X (formerly Twitter) from January 2022 to June 2023, revealing a significant increase in hate speech on the platform. The study found that overall hate speech rose by 50%, with specific categories showing even more dramatic increases: transphobic slurs surged by 260%, homophobic tweets rose by 30%, and racist tweets increased by 42% (source-2). Engagement with hate speech also grew, with hate speech posts receiving 70% more likes per day compared to an average of 22% for random tweets (source-2).

Despite claims from Elon Musk that spam and bot activity would be reduced, the study found no significant decrease in inauthentic accounts, which are often linked to the amplification of harmful content (source-1). The researchers indicated that the policies aimed at reducing harmful content were not effective in curbing the rise of hate speech (source-2).

Analysis

The evidence presented in the study is robust, utilizing a two-step process to identify hate speech through a lexicon of specific terms and refining the dataset to focus on inflammatory content. The researchers compared these trends against a baseline of neutral posts to account for general platform activity, which strengthens the validity of their findings (source-2).

The reliability of the study is bolstered by its publication in a peer-reviewed journal, PLOS ONE, and the involvement of researchers from the USC Viterbi Information Sciences Institute, a reputable academic institution. Additionally, the findings are corroborated by multiple independent reports, including those from Berkeley News and The Independent, which also highlight the spike in hate speech following Musk's acquisition of the platform.

Conversely, the claims made by Musk regarding the unchanged spam rules and their impact on hate speech have been met with skepticism. Experts, including Professor Laura Edelson, have pointed out that while spam rules may not have changed, the enforcement of existing rules has been significantly reduced, contributing to the proliferation of hate speech (source-3). This suggests a disconnect between policy and practice on the platform.

Conclusion

The claim that "hate speech on X surged despite unchanged spam rules" is True. The evidence from the study clearly indicates a substantial increase in hate speech on the platform, alongside a lack of effective moderation and unchanged spam policies. The findings are supported by credible sources and align with expert analyses of the platform's operational changes under Musk's leadership.

Sources

  1. Study finds persistent spike in hate speech on X - Berkeley News
  2. A Platform Problem: Hate Speech and Bots Still Thriving on X - USC Viterbi
  3. Musk's X sues New York over social media hate speech law - BBC
  4. Twitter under Elon Musk - Wikipedia
  5. Hate speech on X increased by 50 percent under Elon Musk's leadership - The Independent
  6. Hate speech on X surged for at least 8 months after Elon Musk takeover - The Conversation
  7. Hate speech on X increased under Elon Musk's ownership - Los Angeles Press
  8. Hate speech and spam bots abound on X under Elon Musk, study shows - The National News

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The kind of masculine energy, I think, is good. Having a culture that celebrates the aggression a bit more has its own merits. That was Mark Zuckerberg speaking on the Joe Rogan podcast in January. The Meta CEO made these comments just as his company was announcing sweeping policy changes, from unwinding its hate speech rules, to rolling back diversity efforts, to breaking up its civil rights team, to ending the fact-checking program that infuriated President Donald Trump during his first term in office. The speed and scope of these moves gave many onlookers a sense of whiplash. So we spoke to more than 50 people about Mark Zuckerberg's politics and his tumultuous relationship to Washington over the years to find out what's up.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The kind of masculine energy, I think, is good. Having a culture that celebrates the aggression a bit more has its own merits. That was Mark Zuckerberg speaking on the Joe Rogan podcast in January. The Meta CEO made these comments just as his company was announcing sweeping policy changes, from unwinding its hate speech rules, to rolling back diversity efforts, to breaking up its civil rights team, to ending the fact-checking program that infuriated President Donald Trump during his first term in office. The speed and scope of these moves gave many onlookers a sense of whiplash. So we spoke to more than 50 people about Mark Zuckerberg's politics and his tumultuous relationship to Washington over the years to find out what's up.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The kind of masculine energy, I think, is good. Having a culture that celebrates the aggression a bit more has its own merits. That was Mark Zuckerberg speaking on the Joe Rogan podcast in January. The Meta CEO made these comments just as his company was announcing sweeping policy changes, from unwinding its hate speech rules, to rolling back diversity efforts, to breaking up its civil rights team, to ending the fact-checking program that infuriated President Donald Trump during his first term in office. The speed and scope of these moves gave many onlookers a sense of whiplash. So we spoke to more than 50 people about Mark Zuckerberg's politics and his tumultuous relationship to Washington over the years to find out what's up.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Large Language Models can promote antisemitism and hate speech.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Large Language Models can promote antisemitism and hate speech.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Large Language Models can promote antisemitism and hate speech.

Jul 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Racial slurs are considered hate speech in many countries.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Racial slurs are considered hate speech in many countries.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Racial slurs are considered hate speech in many countries.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Hate speech laws vary significantly between countries.
True

Fact Check: Hate speech laws vary significantly between countries.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Hate speech laws vary significantly between countries.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Hate speech is defined as speech that incites violence or prejudicial action.
Partially True

Fact Check: Hate speech is defined as speech that incites violence or prejudicial action.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Hate speech is defined as speech that incites violence or prejudicial action.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Hate speech can lead to legal consequences in many countries.
Unverified

Fact Check: Hate speech can lead to legal consequences in many countries.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Hate speech can lead to legal consequences in many countries.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →