Has the SAVE Act Passed in the Senate?

The SAVE Act, which aims to require proof of citizenship for voting in federal elections, has been a topic of significant discussion in recent legislative sessions. As of now, the question remains: has the SAVE Act passed in the Senate? This article examines the current status of the SAVE Act, the legislative process it has undergone, and the implications of its potential passage.

What We Know

1. Current Legislative Status: The SAVE Act, designated as H.R. 8281 in the 118th Congress, was passed by the House of Representatives. According to the official Congressional record, it was read a second time in the Senate and placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar on July 23, 2024, indicating that it is awaiting further action 13.

2. Previous Attempts: This is not the first time the SAVE Act has been introduced. A similar version of the bill was passed by the House in the previous Congress but failed to gain traction in the Senate 510.

3. Senate Dynamics: The Senate currently has a Republican majority, but the SAVE Act requires 60 votes to overcome a filibuster, which complicates its chances of passing, especially given the opposition from Senate Democrats 910.

4. Public and Political Reaction: The SAVE Act has been met with mixed reactions. Supporters argue it is necessary to ensure the integrity of elections, while opponents, including various advocacy groups, argue it could disenfranchise millions of eligible voters 56.

Analysis

Source Evaluation

• Congress.gov: This is an official government website that tracks legislation. It is a reliable source for legislative status and procedural details 13.

• GovTrack.us: This site provides information on the legislative process and is generally considered credible for tracking bills and their progress 34.

• AP News: As a well-established news organization, AP News provides a balanced view of the legislative process and public opinion, although it may have a slight bias depending on the topic 5.

• NPR and USA Today: Both are reputable news sources that cover political issues comprehensively. They provide context and analysis, though they may reflect the editorial slant of their respective audiences 69.

• Distractify and Teen Vogue: These sources may cater to a younger audience and could present information with a specific angle or bias. While they can provide useful insights, their reliability may vary compared to more established news outlets 710.

Methodological Considerations

The legislative process for the SAVE Act involves multiple steps, including committee reviews and votes in both the House and Senate. The requirement for 60 votes in the Senate means that bipartisan support is crucial for the bill's passage. The lack of concrete predictions about the bill's future in the Senate reflects the uncertainty surrounding its reception among senators, particularly those from states with diverse populations 910.

Conflicts of Interest

Some organizations advocating for or against the SAVE Act may have vested interests in the outcome, which could influence their reporting or analysis. For instance, groups focused on voting rights may emphasize the potential disenfranchisement effects of the bill, while those advocating for stricter voting laws may highlight the need for election integrity 56.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The assertion that the SAVE Act has passed in the Senate is false. As of the latest information, the SAVE Act has not yet been voted on by the Senate and is currently awaiting further action after being placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar. Key evidence supporting this conclusion includes the official Congressional record indicating the bill's status and the requirement for 60 votes to overcome a filibuster, which complicates its chances of passage given the current political dynamics.

It is important to note that while the SAVE Act has been passed by the House, its future in the Senate remains uncertain due to the need for bipartisan support and the opposition it faces. This situation highlights the complexities of the legislative process, where bills can stall despite initial successes in one chamber.

Additionally, the evidence available is limited to the current legislative status and does not account for potential future developments or changes in political alignment that could affect the bill's passage. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and stay updated on legislative developments, as the political landscape can change rapidly.

Sources

1. H.R.8281 - 118th Congress (2023-2024): SAVE Act. Retrieved from Congress.gov
2. H.R.22 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): SAVE Act. Retrieved from Congress.gov
3. SAVE Act (2024; 118th Congress H.R. 8281) - GovTrack.us. Retrieved from GovTrack.us
4. H.R. 22: SAVE Act. Retrieved from GovTrack.us
5. House passes SAVE Act, bill requiring proof of citizenship for voting. Retrieved from AP News
6. Will the SAVE Act make it harder for married women to vote. Retrieved from NPR
7. The House Passed the SAVE Act and Sent It to the Senate. Retrieved from Distractify
8. The Future of the SAVE Act. Retrieved from Nonprofit Vote
9. Will the SAVE Act pass the Senate? What Arizonans should know. Retrieved from USA Today
10. The SAVE Act Passed the House. But Senate Democrats Could Block the. Retrieved from Teen Vogue