Fact Check: Gravity is fake

Fact Check: Gravity is fake

Published April 8, 2025
VERDICT
False

# Gravity is Fake: A Detailed Examination of the Claim ## Introduction The claim that "gravity is fake" challenges a fundamental concept in physics t...

Gravity is Fake: A Detailed Examination of the Claim

Introduction

The claim that "gravity is fake" challenges a fundamental concept in physics that has been widely accepted and validated through extensive scientific research. This assertion raises questions about the nature of gravity and the validity of established scientific theories, particularly those proposed by Albert Einstein. This article will explore the available evidence regarding gravity, critically assess the sources of information, and provide context for understanding this claim.

What We Know

  1. Einstein's Theory of General Relativity: Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity, published in 1915, describes gravity not as a force but as a curvature of spacetime caused by mass. This theory has been confirmed through various experiments and observations, including the prediction of gravitational waves and the bending of light around massive objects, known as gravitational lensing 110.

  2. Empirical Evidence: The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites have provided detailed measurements of Earth's gravitational field, demonstrating its variability due to factors such as ocean currents and ice mass loss 2. This empirical data supports the existence of gravity as a measurable phenomenon.

  3. Scientific Consensus: A significant majority of scientists, estimated at over 99%, accept the existence of gravity and its role in the heliocentric model of the solar system 6. This consensus is based on extensive research and corroborative evidence.

  4. Ongoing Research: While Einstein's theory has been foundational, ongoing research continues to explore the nuances of gravity. For example, recent studies have suggested that gravity might behave differently on cosmic scales, indicating that our understanding may evolve 57.

  5. Public Understanding: The concept of gravity is often illustrated through simple examples, such as objects falling to the ground, which serve as intuitive proof of its existence 8. However, the complexity of gravity as a scientific principle extends beyond these basic observations.

Analysis

The claim that "gravity is fake" appears to stem from a misunderstanding or rejection of established scientific principles. The sources that support the existence of gravity, such as those from reputable scientific institutions and peer-reviewed journals, provide robust evidence for its validity. For instance, the Center for Astrophysics and Scientific American both present well-supported discussions on gravity's role in the universe and its empirical validation 19.

Conversely, the claim may be bolstered by fringe theories or interpretations that lack rigorous scientific backing. For instance, the controversial new hypothesis mentioned in one source suggests that gravity may behave differently than previously thought, but it is essential to note that such hypotheses require extensive testing and peer review before they can be accepted as valid alternatives to established theories 7.

Additionally, the claim's credibility is further undermined by the lack of specific details or empirical evidence that would substantiate the assertion that gravity is "fake." Most scientific claims are built upon a foundation of reproducible experiments and observations, which are absent in this case.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The claim that "gravity is fake" is false based on a substantial body of evidence supporting the existence of gravity as a fundamental force in the universe. Key evidence includes Einstein's theory of general relativity, which has been validated through numerous experiments, and empirical data from missions like GRACE that measure gravitational fields. Furthermore, the overwhelming consensus among scientists reinforces the validity of gravity as a scientific principle.

However, it is important to acknowledge that while our understanding of gravity may evolve with ongoing research, this does not negate its existence. The complexities of gravity, particularly in extreme conditions or cosmic scales, are areas of active inquiry, but they do not support the claim that gravity is nonexistent.

Limitations in the available evidence include the fact that some fringe theories may present alternative views, but these lack the rigorous testing and peer review necessary to be considered credible. Thus, while scientific inquiry is essential for advancing our understanding, the foundational evidence for gravity remains robust.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider the weight of scientific consensus and empirical evidence when encountering claims that challenge established scientific principles.

Sources

  1. Einstein's Theory of Gravitation - Center for Astrophysics. Retrieved from https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/research/science-field/einsteins-theory-gravitation
  2. Gravity data sheds new light on ocean, climate - NASA. Retrieved from https://climate.nasa.gov/news/152/gravity-data-sheds-new-light-on-ocean-climate/
  3. Einstein's Theory of Gravity and the Problem of Missing Mass - Science. Retrieved from https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1172245
  4. Defining gravity - Nature Physics. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys3786
  5. Physicists Probe Validity of Einstein's Gravity - Scientific American. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-probe-validity-of-einsteins-gravity-on-cosmic-scales/
  6. The Debate is Over – 99% of Scientists believe Gravity and the heliocentric solar system - Science of Doom. Retrieved from https://scienceofdoom.com/2017/08/01/the-debate-is-over-99-of-scientists-believe-gravity-and-the-heliocentric-solar-system-so-therefore/
  7. A Controversial New Gravity Hypothesis Has Passed Its First Test - Science Alert. Retrieved from https://www.sciencealert.com/a-controversial-new-gravity-hypothesis-has-passed-its-first-test
  8. What is the scientific proof for gravity? | Culture Online. Retrieved from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/culture-online/case-studies/2021/mar/what-scientific-proof-gravity
  9. Gravity - Scientific American. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/gravity/
  10. Einstein’s genius changed science’s perception of gravity - Science News. Retrieved from https://www.sciencenews.org/article/einsteins-genius-changed-sciences-perception-gravity

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Moon landing was fake
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Moon landing was fake

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Moon landing was fake

Aug 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 	
So now I may expose everything
they love hiding from
customers. First, half of the
security cameras at Walmart are
literally fake. I saw someone
open one up and it was
literally just a plastic shell.
They're just there to scare
you. Alright, they be hiding
this but y'all really can get a
seven hundred dollar Walmart
gift card. If you sign up at
700 WM. com, everyone is
qualified for this and I still
do this every month since I'm a
single mom. Next, if you find
something in Walmart that's
already been open or with
ripped packaging, you can ask
for a discount and we have to
give it to you. Okay now if you
comment Walmart in the comments
00:32
I'll send you a little bonus
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: So now I may expose everything they love hiding from customers. First, half of the security cameras at Walmart are literally fake. I saw someone open one up and it was literally just a plastic shell. They're just there to scare you. Alright, they be hiding this but y'all really can get a seven hundred dollar Walmart gift card. If you sign up at 700 WM. com, everyone is qualified for this and I still do this every month since I'm a single mom. Next, if you find something in Walmart that's already been open or with ripped packaging, you can ask for a discount and we have to give it to you. Okay now if you comment Walmart in the comments 00:32 I'll send you a little bonus

Detailed fact-check analysis of: So now I may expose everything they love hiding from customers. First, half of the security cameras at Walmart are literally fake. I saw someone open one up and it was literally just a plastic shell. They're just there to scare you. Alright, they be hiding this but y'all really can get a seven hundred dollar Walmart gift card. If you sign up at 700 WM. com, everyone is qualified for this and I still do this every month since I'm a single mom. Next, if you find something in Walmart that's already been open or with ripped packaging, you can ask for a discount and we have to give it to you. Okay now if you comment Walmart in the comments 00:32 I'll send you a little bonus

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: there are modefied whethers and fake pandemics'
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: there are modefied whethers and fake pandemics'

Detailed fact-check analysis of: there are modefied whethers and fake pandemics'

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Gravity is a void
False

Fact Check: Gravity is a void

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Gravity is a void

Jul 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Epstein client list is fake and was written by Obama.
False

Fact Check: The Epstein client list is fake and was written by Obama.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Epstein client list is fake and was written by Obama.

Jul 14, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Gravity is fake | TruthOrFake Blog