Fact Check: Government policies have increased public mistrust of the media.

Fact Check: Government policies have increased public mistrust of the media.

Published June 28, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: Government policies have increased public mistrust of the media ## What We Know The claim that government policies have increased publi...

Fact Check: Government policies have increased public mistrust of the media

What We Know

The claim that government policies have increased public mistrust of the media is supported by various studies and reports. A significant source is the 2025 Edelman Trust Barometer, which indicates that a high percentage of individuals with a strong sense of grievance—defined as a belief that institutions serve narrow interests—distrust media alongside other institutions like government and business. This sentiment is particularly pronounced among younger demographics, with 53% of respondents aged 18-34 expressing approval for hostile forms of activism, including disinformation and violence, against perceived injustices.

Moreover, the Project 2025 report outlines a conservative agenda that includes proposals to defund public broadcasting services, which the authors label as biased and noneducational. This agenda reflects a broader trend of hostility towards mainstream media, echoing former President Trump's rhetoric that labeled the press as "the enemy of the people." The report suggests that such policies could further alienate the public from trusting media sources.

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim comes from credible sources, including the Edelman Trust Barometer and the Brookings Institution's analysis of Project 2025. The Edelman report is a well-regarded annual survey that measures trust across various institutions globally, making it a reliable indicator of public sentiment regarding media trustworthiness. The findings reveal a correlation between governmental actions and public perceptions of media, particularly in contexts where government rhetoric is critical of the press.

On the other hand, the Project 2025 report, while produced by a reputable think tank, has been critiqued for its political bias and the potential implications of its recommendations. Critics argue that the proposals could undermine democratic institutions and civil liberties, particularly regarding media access and funding. The report's alignment with Trump's administration raises questions about its objectivity, as it reflects a specific ideological stance that may not represent broader public opinion.

While the evidence suggests a link between government policies and increased public mistrust of the media, it is essential to note that this mistrust is also influenced by other factors, including the rise of social media, misinformation, and changing consumption habits. Therefore, while government policies play a role, they are not the sole factor in the erosion of trust in media.

Conclusion

The claim that government policies have increased public mistrust of the media is Partially True. There is substantial evidence indicating that certain government actions and rhetoric, particularly from conservative factions, have contributed to a growing skepticism towards media institutions. However, this mistrust is also shaped by broader societal trends and technological changes that extend beyond government influence alone.

Sources

  1. Project 2025: What a second Trump term could mean for media and technology policies
  2. Post-Election Poll Study Reveals Deepening Distrust in Government and Information Sources
  3. 2025 Edelman Trust Barometer
  4. Overview and key findings of the 2025 Digital News Report

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: 173 Nations Just Granted Expanded Powers to the WHO While public attention was elsewhere, representatives from 173 countries voted to significantly expand the authority of the World Health Organization (WHO) over national health policies, border decisions, and personal freedoms.
Under these new agreements, when the WHO declares a "global health emergency," it will no longer need to seek approval from individual governments to enforce its directives. Your nation has already committed to following their lead.
This could include:
Border shutdowns
Lockdowns
Mass vaccination efforts
Digital health ID systems
All potentially initiated by unelected figures such as WHO Directo
General Tedros Ghebreyesus or influential private actors like Bill
Gates-without any democratic input from the citizens who will b
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: 173 Nations Just Granted Expanded Powers to the WHO While public attention was elsewhere, representatives from 173 countries voted to significantly expand the authority of the World Health Organization (WHO) over national health policies, border decisions, and personal freedoms. Under these new agreements, when the WHO declares a "global health emergency," it will no longer need to seek approval from individual governments to enforce its directives. Your nation has already committed to following their lead. This could include: Border shutdowns Lockdowns Mass vaccination efforts Digital health ID systems All potentially initiated by unelected figures such as WHO Directo General Tedros Ghebreyesus or influential private actors like Bill Gates-without any democratic input from the citizens who will b

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 173 Nations Just Granted Expanded Powers to the WHO While public attention was elsewhere, representatives from 173 countries voted to significantly expand the authority of the World Health Organization (WHO) over national health policies, border decisions, and personal freedoms. Under these new agreements, when the WHO declares a "global health emergency," it will no longer need to seek approval from individual governments to enforce its directives. Your nation has already committed to following their lead. This could include: Border shutdowns Lockdowns Mass vaccination efforts Digital health ID systems All potentially initiated by unelected figures such as WHO Directo General Tedros Ghebreyesus or influential private actors like Bill Gates-without any democratic input from the citizens who will b

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: "Project Esther" (from the Heritage Foundation, like Project 2025) aims to:

Eradicate all religions except one, force its practice, and imprison or execute those who defy it.

Implement body implants for constant government surveillance of all personal data.

Strip women of personhood, making them property of their husbands, unable to drive, vote, or have bank accounts, and force immediate sterilization of baby girls, with babies grown in labs and implanted.

Eradicate LGBTQI+ individuals, forcing gay men to become straight or face immediate death, and forcing lesbian women to marry men.

Replace the U.S. Constitution with biblical law.

Criminalize abortion nationally with the death penalty.

Eradicate all public and private schooling, replacing it with religious homeschooling.

Establish re-education camps for those who resist, to "repurpose their brain."

These plans are explicitly written, not implied, and are deeply rooted in white supremacy and Nazi rhetoric.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: "Project Esther" (from the Heritage Foundation, like Project 2025) aims to: Eradicate all religions except one, force its practice, and imprison or execute those who defy it. Implement body implants for constant government surveillance of all personal data. Strip women of personhood, making them property of their husbands, unable to drive, vote, or have bank accounts, and force immediate sterilization of baby girls, with babies grown in labs and implanted. Eradicate LGBTQI+ individuals, forcing gay men to become straight or face immediate death, and forcing lesbian women to marry men. Replace the U.S. Constitution with biblical law. Criminalize abortion nationally with the death penalty. Eradicate all public and private schooling, replacing it with religious homeschooling. Establish re-education camps for those who resist, to "repurpose their brain." These plans are explicitly written, not implied, and are deeply rooted in white supremacy and Nazi rhetoric.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "Project Esther" (from the Heritage Foundation, like Project 2025) aims to: Eradicate all religions except one, force its practice, and imprison or execute those who defy it. Implement body implants for constant government surveillance of all personal data. Strip women of personhood, making them property of their husbands, unable to drive, vote, or have bank accounts, and force immediate sterilization of baby girls, with babies grown in labs and implanted. Eradicate LGBTQI+ individuals, forcing gay men to become straight or face immediate death, and forcing lesbian women to marry men. Replace the U.S. Constitution with biblical law. Criminalize abortion nationally with the death penalty. Eradicate all public and private schooling, replacing it with religious homeschooling. Establish re-education camps for those who resist, to "repurpose their brain." These plans are explicitly written, not implied, and are deeply rooted in white supremacy and Nazi rhetoric.

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Government Subsidies for Roof Replacement
Seniors will have the opportunity to qualify for free roof repair services through this limited-time offer!
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Government Subsidies for Roof Replacement Seniors will have the opportunity to qualify for free roof repair services through this limited-time offer!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Government Subsidies for Roof Replacement Seniors will have the opportunity to qualify for free roof repair services through this limited-time offer!

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Government Subsidies for Roof Replacement
Partially True

Fact Check: Government Subsidies for Roof Replacement

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Government Subsidies for Roof Replacement

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Nearly 37 million Americans lived below the official poverty line in 2023. Another 38 million more would be in poverty if not for government aid like food stamps… $1.2 trillion spent annually on programs keeping them afloat.”
Partially True

Fact Check: Nearly 37 million Americans lived below the official poverty line in 2023. Another 38 million more would be in poverty if not for government aid like food stamps… $1.2 trillion spent annually on programs keeping them afloat.”

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Nearly 37 million Americans lived below the official poverty line in 2023. Another 38 million more would be in poverty if not for government aid like food stamps… $1.2 trillion spent annually on programs keeping them afloat.”

Aug 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Adrian Zenz is a us government agent
Partially True

Fact Check: Adrian Zenz is a us government agent

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Adrian Zenz is a us government agent

Aug 6, 2025
Read more →