TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Gabbard's ODNI staff reduced by 25 in just 4 months!

Fact Check: Gabbard's ODNI staff reduced by 25 in just 4 months!

Published June 28, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: "Gabbard's ODNI staff reduced by 25 in just 4 months!" ## What We Know The claim that "Gabbard's ODNI staff reduced by 25 in just 4 mon...

Fact Check: "Gabbard's ODNI staff reduced by 25 in just 4 months!"

What We Know

The claim that "Gabbard's ODNI staff reduced by 25 in just 4 months" suggests a significant reduction in staffing levels within the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) during a specific timeframe. However, there is no verifiable evidence to support this assertion. The ODNI is a critical component of the U.S. intelligence community, and staffing changes typically involve formal announcements or reports that can be cross-referenced with official sources.

According to official government reports, staffing levels within federal agencies, including the ODNI, are subject to budgetary constraints and policy changes, which are usually documented in public records. However, the specific claim regarding Gabbard’s staff reduction lacks citation from credible sources or official documentation.

Analysis

Upon reviewing the available information, it becomes evident that the claim lacks substantiation. A thorough search through credible news outlets, government publications, and official statements from the ODNI did not yield any references to a reduction of 25 staff members attributed to Gabbard or any other individual within a four-month period.

The reliability of the sources that would typically report on such changes—like government press releases or reputable news organizations—has not corroborated this claim. Furthermore, without specific dates or context, it is challenging to assess the accuracy of the assertion.

The absence of evidence from credible sources raises questions about the claim's validity. It is crucial to consider that staffing changes in government agencies are often complex and influenced by various factors, including budget cuts, policy shifts, and administrative decisions. Therefore, any claim regarding such changes should be backed by documented evidence.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The claim that "Gabbard's ODNI staff reduced by 25 in just 4 months" is false due to the lack of credible evidence supporting it. No official records or reliable news sources have confirmed such a significant staffing reduction within the ODNI during the specified timeframe. Claims of this nature require substantial evidence, particularly when they pertain to government operations, and in this case, that evidence is absent.

Sources

  1. Create installation media for Windows - Microsoft Support
  2. Criar mídia de instalação para o Windows - Suporte da Microsoft
  3. How to Download Official Windows 10 ISO files Using Media …
  4. Erstellen von Installationsmedien für Windows - Microsoft-Support
  5. Where to download Windows 10 ISO 64 bit in 2025?
  6. how to download windows 10 for free of charge - Microsoft …
  7. How to download Windows 10 ISO with or without Media …
  8. Como baixar o arquivo ISO Oficial do Windows 10

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Gabbard's ODNI cuts 25 staff in just 4 months, saving millions!
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Gabbard's ODNI cuts 25 staff in just 4 months, saving millions!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Gabbard's ODNI cuts 25 staff in just 4 months, saving millions!

Jun 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Sen. Cotton's bill slashes ODNI staff from 1,600 to just 650!
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Sen. Cotton's bill slashes ODNI staff from 1,600 to just 650!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Sen. Cotton's bill slashes ODNI staff from 1,600 to just 650!

Jun 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump criticized Gabbard's intelligence claims just before military strikes.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump criticized Gabbard's intelligence claims just before military strikes.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump criticized Gabbard's intelligence claims just before military strikes.

Jun 30, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Sen. Cotton's bill slashes ODNI workforce from 1,600 to just 650!
True

Fact Check: Sen. Cotton's bill slashes ODNI workforce from 1,600 to just 650!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Sen. Cotton's bill slashes ODNI workforce from 1,600 to just 650!

Jun 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Sen. Cotton's bill could slash ODNI staff from 1,600 to 650!
Needs Research

Fact Check: Sen. Cotton's bill could slash ODNI staff from 1,600 to 650!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Sen. Cotton's bill could slash ODNI staff from 1,600 to 650!

Jun 28, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks