TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Four people killed and at least 20 injured in Iranian strikes on Israel.

Fact Check: Four people killed and at least 20 injured in Iranian strikes on Israel.

Published June 24, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Four people killed and at least 20 injured in Iranian strikes on Israel" ## What We Know Recent reports confirm that Iranian missile s...

Fact Check: "Four people killed and at least 20 injured in Iranian strikes on Israel"

What We Know

Recent reports confirm that Iranian missile strikes on Israel resulted in multiple casualties. Specifically, four individuals were reported dead in central Israel due to missile impacts, with additional reports indicating that at least 99 people were injured, four of whom were in serious condition (BBC). The strikes targeted residential areas, including a neighborhood near Haifa, leading to significant destruction and prompting emergency responses (AP News).

The ongoing conflict has seen Iran launching missiles and drones at various locations in Israel, while Israel has retaliated with airstrikes on Iranian military and nuclear sites (New York Times). The situation remains fluid, with casualty figures potentially changing as more information becomes available.

Analysis

The claim that "four people killed and at least 20 injured in Iranian strikes on Israel" is partially true. The confirmed death toll stands at four, as reported by multiple credible sources, including Israeli emergency services (BBC). However, the number of injured is significantly higher than "at least 20," with reports indicating that 99 individuals were treated for injuries following the strikes (BBC). This discrepancy suggests that the claim may understate the severity of the situation.

While the sources reporting these events are generally reliable, the context of the ongoing conflict raises concerns about potential bias. For instance, Iranian state media may present the situation differently than Western outlets, emphasizing civilian casualties on one side while downplaying military losses on the other (Wikipedia). Therefore, while the casualty figures are corroborated by multiple reports, the framing of the events can vary significantly based on the source.

Conclusion

The claim that "four people killed and at least 20 injured in Iranian strikes on Israel" is partially true. The confirmed fatalities are accurate, but the number of injured is significantly higher than stated. This highlights the importance of precise reporting in conflict situations, where casualty figures can rapidly evolve and vary across different sources.

Sources

  1. Iran missiles cause multiple casualties after strikes in Israel
  2. List of attacks during the Iran-Israel war - Wikipedia
  3. October 2024 Iranian strikes on Israel - Wikipedia
  4. Israel and Iran Trade New Strikes on 9th Day of War
  5. Iran hits Israel with a second wave of missiles | AP News
  6. Israeli Attacks in Iran Kill Three More Commanders, Israel ...
  7. The Latest: Iranian missile strikes kill 4 in southern Israel as ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: At least fifteen people have been injured in the latest wave of Russian drone strikes, which this time hit four Ukrainian cities. Video shows firefighters battling flames from a large blaze. This comes amid the 50-day deadline from the #US for #Russia to secure a peace deal.⁠
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: At least fifteen people have been injured in the latest wave of Russian drone strikes, which this time hit four Ukrainian cities. Video shows firefighters battling flames from a large blaze. This comes amid the 50-day deadline from the #US for #Russia to secure a peace deal.⁠

Detailed fact-check analysis of: At least fifteen people have been injured in the latest wave of Russian drone strikes, which this time hit four Ukrainian cities. Video shows firefighters battling flames from a large blaze. This comes amid the 50-day deadline from the #US for #Russia to secure a peace deal.⁠

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Found out there's a 15 year old boy being held prisoner at the Everglades concentration camp where prisoners have one meal a day, two minutes to eat it, there's maggots in the food, there's sewage near their beds because the toilets don't work, they have the lights on twenty-four seven so people can't sleep, Bibles are taken away from prisoners, and prisoners are told there is no religion here. Um they they're surrounded by mosquitoes and This is a concentration camp.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Found out there's a 15 year old boy being held prisoner at the Everglades concentration camp where prisoners have one meal a day, two minutes to eat it, there's maggots in the food, there's sewage near their beds because the toilets don't work, they have the lights on twenty-four seven so people can't sleep, Bibles are taken away from prisoners, and prisoners are told there is no religion here. Um they they're surrounded by mosquitoes and This is a concentration camp.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Found out there's a 15 year old boy being held prisoner at the Everglades concentration camp where prisoners have one meal a day, two minutes to eat it, there's maggots in the food, there's sewage near their beds because the toilets don't work, they have the lights on twenty-four seven so people can't sleep, Bibles are taken away from prisoners, and prisoners are told there is no religion here. Um they they're surrounded by mosquitoes and This is a concentration camp.

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Four U.S. Senators—Michael Bennet, Richard Blumenthal, Cory Booker, and Maria Cantwell—have accepted specific, large sums of money from "pro-Israel groups" between 2023 and 2024.
Unverified

Fact Check: Four U.S. Senators—Michael Bennet, Richard Blumenthal, Cory Booker, and Maria Cantwell—have accepted specific, large sums of money from "pro-Israel groups" between 2023 and 2024.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Four U.S. Senators—Michael Bennet, Richard Blumenthal, Cory Booker, and Maria Cantwell—have accepted specific, large sums of money from "pro-Israel groups" between 2023 and 2024.

Aug 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Varroa mites have evolved resistance to at least four major classes of miticide since the 1980s.
True

Fact Check: Varroa mites have evolved resistance to at least four major classes of miticide since the 1980s.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Varroa mites have evolved resistance to at least four major classes of miticide since the 1980s.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In 1860, there were fewer than 10 Republicans in the United States who owned slaves, and the vast majority of the approximately four million slaves were owned by Democrats.
Partially True

Fact Check: In 1860, there were fewer than 10 Republicans in the United States who owned slaves, and the vast majority of the approximately four million slaves were owned by Democrats.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In 1860, there were fewer than 10 Republicans in the United States who owned slaves, and the vast majority of the approximately four million slaves were owned by Democrats.

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks