TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Four detainees escaped from the Delaney Hall immigration detention facility in Newark, New Jersey, according to the Department of Homeland Security on October 26, 2023.

Fact Check: Four detainees escaped from the Delaney Hall immigration detention facility in Newark, New Jersey, according to the Department of Homeland Security on October 26, 2023.

Published June 14, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: Four Detainees Escaped from Delaney Hall Immigration Detention Facility ## What We Know On October 26, 2023, it was reported that four ...

Fact Check: Four Detainees Escaped from Delaney Hall Immigration Detention Facility

What We Know

On October 26, 2023, it was reported that four detainees escaped from the Delaney Hall immigration detention facility in Newark, New Jersey. The escape was confirmed by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and local officials, including Senator Andy Kim and Newark Mayor Ras Baraka. According to reports, the detainees managed to break through an interior wall, which led to their escape into a parking lot (AP News, Washington Post). The escapees included two Colombian men and two Hondurans, with charges ranging from burglary to aggravated assault (NBC News).

The incident occurred amid reports of unrest at the facility, which had been experiencing issues related to food shortages and overcrowding. Witnesses described a chaotic scene where detainees were upset over delayed meals, leading to disturbances inside the facility (New York Times).

Analysis

The claim that four detainees escaped from Delaney Hall is substantiated by multiple credible sources, including major news outlets like the Associated Press, Washington Post, and NBC News. These sources provide consistent details about the escape, including the identities of the escapees and the circumstances surrounding their flight.

The reliability of these sources is bolstered by their established reputations for journalistic integrity and fact-checking. For instance, the Associated Press is known for its rigorous standards in reporting, while the Washington Post has a long history of investigative journalism (AP News, Washington Post).

However, there are conflicting narratives regarding the conditions at Delaney Hall. While DHS stated that there was "no widespread unrest" at the facility, local officials and advocates reported significant dissatisfaction among detainees regarding food and treatment (NBC News, AP News). This discrepancy raises questions about the accuracy of the DHS's assessment and highlights the potential for bias in official statements.

The escape itself appears to be a direct result of the unrest, as detainees reportedly broke through walls during a disturbance. This connection between the conditions at the facility and the escape is supported by testimonies from detainees' family members and advocacy groups (New York Times, NBC News).

Conclusion

The claim that four detainees escaped from the Delaney Hall immigration detention facility on October 26, 2023, is True. The escape has been confirmed by multiple reliable sources, including the DHS, and is supported by eyewitness accounts and reports of unrest within the facility. The situation reflects broader issues regarding the treatment of detainees and the conditions at immigration detention centers.

Sources

  1. 4 detainees escape Newark, New Jersey, immigration ...
  2. Four escape migrant detention center in Newark, N.J., ...
  3. What Led to 4 Detainees Escaping a Migrant Facility in ...
  4. Four detainees at Newark immigration facility have ...
  5. 4 detainees escaped from a Newark ICE detention facility after advocat…

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Four U.S. Senators—Michael Bennet, Richard Blumenthal, Cory Booker, and Maria Cantwell—have accepted specific, large sums of money from "pro-Israel groups" between 2023 and 2024.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Four U.S. Senators—Michael Bennet, Richard Blumenthal, Cory Booker, and Maria Cantwell—have accepted specific, large sums of money from "pro-Israel groups" between 2023 and 2024.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Four U.S. Senators—Michael Bennet, Richard Blumenthal, Cory Booker, and Maria Cantwell—have accepted specific, large sums of money from "pro-Israel groups" between 2023 and 2024.

Aug 11, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: RECYCLING CLING GLASS BOTTLES BOTTLESAVESE SAVES SAVESENOUGH ENERGYTO ENERGYTOPOWERA POWERA NORMAL LIGHT BULB FOR FOUR HOURS.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: RECYCLING CLING GLASS BOTTLES BOTTLESAVESE SAVES SAVESENOUGH ENERGYTO ENERGYTOPOWERA POWERA NORMAL LIGHT BULB FOR FOUR HOURS.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: RECYCLING CLING GLASS BOTTLES BOTTLESAVESE SAVES SAVESENOUGH ENERGYTO ENERGYTOPOWERA POWERA NORMAL LIGHT BULB FOR FOUR HOURS.

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Texas congressional maps have unconstitutional racial gerrymanders in four districts.
True

Fact Check: Texas congressional maps have unconstitutional racial gerrymanders in four districts.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Texas congressional maps have unconstitutional racial gerrymanders in four districts.

Jul 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Houthis targeted more than 100 merchant vessels, sinking two and killing four sailors.
True

Fact Check: The Houthis targeted more than 100 merchant vessels, sinking two and killing four sailors.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Houthis targeted more than 100 merchant vessels, sinking two and killing four sailors.

Jul 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The United Kingdom is made up of four countries: England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.
True

Fact Check: The United Kingdom is made up of four countries: England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The United Kingdom is made up of four countries: England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Four detainees escaped from the Delaney Hall immigration detention facility in Newark, New Jersey, according to the Department of Homeland Security on October 26, 2023. | TruthOrFake Blog