Fact Check: foreign people coming into the uk are raping kids

Published April 21, 2025
VERDICT
Mostly False

# The Claim: "Foreign people coming into the UK are raping kids" ## Introduction The claim that "foreign people coming into the UK are raping kids" s...

The Claim: "Foreign people coming into the UK are raping kids"

Introduction

The claim that "foreign people coming into the UK are raping kids" suggests a significant link between immigration and child sexual offenses in the UK. This assertion raises serious concerns about the safety of children and the implications for immigration policy. However, the claim requires careful examination of available data and context to assess its validity and implications.

What We Know

  1. Statistics on Sexual Offenses: According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), there were 773,000 adults aged 16 to 74 who experienced sexual assault (including attempts) in the year ending March 2020. The data indicates a significant gender disparity, with 618,000 female victims compared to 155,000 male victims 1.

  2. Child Sexual Offenses: The ONS provides data on child sexual offenses, indicating trends and prevalence. However, the data collection methods and response rates can affect the reliability of these statistics 2. The ONS also notes that child sexual abuse encompasses a range of offenses, with various data sources contributing to the overall understanding of the issue 4.

  3. Foreign Nationals and Crime: A report from the UK government indicates that foreign nationals can be involved in serious crimes, including sexual offenses. However, the report does not specify the proportion of these crimes that are committed against children 6.

  4. Recent Data on Sexual Offenses: A recent article from The Telegraph claims that foreign nationals are responsible for nearly a quarter of sexual offenses in the UK, citing data obtained from the Ministry of Justice 10. However, the methodology behind this data collection and its interpretation requires scrutiny.

  5. Conflicting Perspectives: A Wikipedia entry notes that white British defendants are more frequently convicted of child sexual abuse offenses than foreign nationals, suggesting that the narrative linking immigration to child sexual offenses may not be as straightforward as it appears 8.

Analysis

The claim that foreign nationals are disproportionately responsible for child sexual offenses in the UK is supported by some sources but contested by others.

  • Source Reliability: The ONS is a reputable source for crime statistics in the UK, providing comprehensive data on sexual offenses. However, the limitations of their data collection methods, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, raise questions about the accuracy of trends reported in recent years 2.

  • Potential Bias: The sources that assert a high involvement of foreign nationals in sexual offenses, such as the article from The Telegraph and the report from Your News, may have inherent biases. These sources often focus on sensational aspects of crime statistics, which can skew public perception and reinforce negative stereotypes about immigrants 910.

  • Methodological Concerns: The claim relies on statistics that may not adequately differentiate between types of offenders or the context of their crimes. For instance, the ONS data does not provide a clear breakdown of offenses by the nationality of the offender, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the relationship between immigration and child sexual offenses 34.

  • Need for Context: Understanding the broader context of crime in the UK is essential. Factors such as socio-economic conditions, community resources, and law enforcement practices can all influence crime rates and should be considered when evaluating claims about specific groups of offenders.

Conclusion

Verdict: Mostly False

The claim that "foreign people coming into the UK are raping kids" is mostly false due to a lack of robust evidence directly linking immigration to child sexual offenses. While some sources suggest that foreign nationals may be involved in sexual crimes, the data does not clearly indicate that these offenses are predominantly committed against children or that foreign nationals are disproportionately responsible compared to other groups.

Key evidence includes the ONS data, which highlights the complexities of sexual offenses and indicates that white British individuals are more frequently convicted of child sexual abuse than foreign nationals. Additionally, the methodologies of sources claiming a high involvement of foreign nationals in sexual offenses warrant scrutiny, as they may be influenced by biases and sensationalism.

It is important to acknowledge the limitations in the available evidence, including the lack of clear differentiation in crime statistics by offender nationality and the potential for misinterpretation of data. This uncertainty underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of crime and immigration issues.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider the broader context when assessing claims related to crime and immigration.

Sources

  1. Office for National Statistics. (2021). Sexual offences in England and Wales overview. Retrieved from ONS
  2. Office for National Statistics. (2023). Sexual offences prevalence and trends, England and Wales. Retrieved from ONS
  3. Office for National Statistics. (2023). Child sexual offence cases in the UK by region. Retrieved from ONS
  4. Office for National Statistics. (2020). Child sexual abuse in England and Wales. Retrieved from ONS
  5. GOV.UK. (2023). Victims of crimes committed by non-British citizens. Retrieved from GOV.UK
  6. Office for National Statistics. (2023). Crimes against children. Retrieved from ONS
  7. Wikipedia. (2023). Child sexual abuse in the United Kingdom. Retrieved from Wikipedia
  8. Your News. (2025). UK Migrant Crime Statistics Reveal Sexual Offense Convictions. Retrieved from Your News
  9. The Telegraph. (2025). Foreigners convicted of nearly a quarter of sex crimes. Retrieved from The Telegraph

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: People in Scandinavia and Benelux are good to speak foreign languages
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: People in Scandinavia and Benelux are good to speak foreign languages

Detailed fact-check analysis of: People in Scandinavia and Benelux are good to speak foreign languages

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Foreign Investor Quietly Drops $65M. on Fire-Charred Malibu Lots. Real estate insiders say the buyer, not a U.S. citizen, snapped up multiple burned properties through shell companies and cash deals after January's wildfires. The investor’s identity and country of origin remain hidden behind layers of legal and financial secrecy.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Foreign Investor Quietly Drops $65M. on Fire-Charred Malibu Lots. Real estate insiders say the buyer, not a U.S. citizen, snapped up multiple burned properties through shell companies and cash deals after January's wildfires. The investor’s identity and country of origin remain hidden behind layers of legal and financial secrecy.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Foreign Investor Quietly Drops $65M. on Fire-Charred Malibu Lots. Real estate insiders say the buyer, not a U.S. citizen, snapped up multiple burned properties through shell companies and cash deals after January's wildfires. The investor’s identity and country of origin remain hidden behind layers of legal and financial secrecy.

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: A foreign investor has quietly dropped $65 million on multiple fire-charred properties in Malibu through shell companies and cash deals after January's wildfires.
True

Fact Check: A foreign investor has quietly dropped $65 million on multiple fire-charred properties in Malibu through shell companies and cash deals after January's wildfires.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A foreign investor has quietly dropped $65 million on multiple fire-charred properties in Malibu through shell companies and cash deals after January's wildfires.

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: : In the past year, 1,180 Nepalis who had gone for foreign employment had to return in coffins.
True

Fact Check: : In the past year, 1,180 Nepalis who had gone for foreign employment had to return in coffins.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: : In the past year, 1,180 Nepalis who had gone for foreign employment had to return in coffins.

Aug 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Does Ramaphosa have a foreign arrest warrant
Unverified

Fact Check: Does Ramaphosa have a foreign arrest warrant

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Does Ramaphosa have a foreign arrest warrant

Aug 12, 2025
Read more →