Fact Check: "Flock Safety blocked access to 62 out-of-state agencies that have sought data related to abortion or immigration."
What We Know
Flock Safety, a company that provides automated license plate reader (ALPR) technology, has indeed taken steps to restrict access to its data concerning certain sensitive topics. According to multiple sources, including a report from 6ABC and the Taylorville Daily News, Illinois officials confirmed that Flock Safety blocked access to 62 out-of-state agencies that were seeking data related to abortion or immigration. This action was reportedly initiated at the request of Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias, who aimed to prevent the misuse of license plate data for purposes that could infringe upon reproductive rights and immigration protections.
Further, Flock Safety has implemented a program to flag requests that mention "abortion" or "immigration," denying those requests outright (6ABC, 5). This aligns with broader concerns about the potential for surveillance technologies to be used in ways that could target individuals seeking reproductive healthcare or undocumented immigrants.
Analysis
The claim that Flock Safety blocked access to 62 out-of-state agencies seeking data related to abortion or immigration is supported by credible reports from multiple news outlets. The direct involvement of Illinois officials, particularly Secretary Giannoulias, lends credibility to the assertion that these actions were taken in response to concerns about the misuse of surveillance data (6ABC, 5).
However, it is important to consider the context and implications of these actions. While Flock Safety's decision to block access is a positive step toward protecting privacy rights, it does not eliminate the broader issue of how ALPR technology is utilized by law enforcement agencies. Reports indicate that many agencies still have access to these databases and can use them for various investigations, often without stringent oversight (3, 4). Thus, while the specific claim about blocking access is true, it does not fully capture the ongoing concerns surrounding surveillance practices and their potential impact on civil liberties.
The reliability of the sources reporting this information is generally high, as they include established news outlets and official statements from government officials. However, the potential for bias should be acknowledged, particularly in discussions surrounding sensitive topics like abortion and immigration, where narratives can be heavily influenced by political agendas.
Conclusion
The claim that "Flock Safety blocked access to 62 out-of-state agencies that have sought data related to abortion or immigration" is Partially True. While it is accurate that Flock Safety has taken steps to restrict access to its data in these contexts, the broader implications of surveillance technology and its use by law enforcement remain a significant concern. The blocking of access does not address the overall landscape of surveillance and its potential misuse, which continues to pose risks to individual rights.
Sources
- Subject-by-Subject Breakdown of Trump's Project 2025
- Dangers of Automated License Plate Readers to Immigrant ...
- She Got an Abortion. So A Texas Cop Used 83,000 Cameras to Track Her ...
- Illinois officials investigate license-plate data shared ... - 6ABC
- SRN - US News - Taylorville Daily News
- Texas police 'abused' license plate data for immigration ...
- Some Calif. cops still sharing license plate info with anti-abortion ...
- Officials investigate license-plate data shared with police for ...