TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: First Aukus submarine for Australia won't be ready until early 2040s.

Fact Check: First Aukus submarine for Australia won't be ready until early 2040s.

Published June 24, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "First AUKUS submarine for Australia won't be ready until early 2040s." ## What We Know The claim that the first AUKUS submarine for Au...

Fact Check: "First AUKUS submarine for Australia won't be ready until early 2040s."

What We Know

The claim that the first AUKUS submarine for Australia will not be ready until the early 2040s is supported by several credible sources. According to the Australian Government's Defence Department, Australia plans to begin construction of its first SSN-AUKUS submarine in Adelaide by the end of this decade, with delivery expected in the early 2040s. This timeline aligns with information from the United States Studies Centre, which indicates that the earliest possible delivery of the submarines would be around 2055, although the first Australian-built submarine is expected in the early 2040s. Additionally, a media release from the Defence Ministers confirms that the first SSN-AUKUS built in Australia will be delivered in the early 2040s.

Analysis

The sources supporting the claim are credible and come from official government and defense-related organizations. The Australian Government's Defence Department is a primary source, providing direct information about the construction and delivery timeline of the submarines. The United States Studies Centre, while an independent think tank, is known for its research on U.S.-Australia relations and defense matters, adding a layer of reliability to its projections.

However, it is important to note that while the early 2040s is the expected timeframe for the first submarine, there are complexities involved in defense procurement that could potentially alter this timeline. The Financial Review also highlights that the overall cost and timeline for the AUKUS submarines are subject to change, which suggests that while the early 2040s is the current expectation, it is not set in stone.

Conclusion

Needs Research. While the claim that the first AUKUS submarine for Australia will not be ready until the early 2040s is supported by credible sources, the complexities of defense procurement and potential changes in timelines warrant further investigation. The current projections are based on available information, but as with many large-scale defense projects, unforeseen challenges could impact these timelines.

Sources

  1. Skilled Worker visa: Knowledge of English - GOV.UK
  2. PDF SSN-AUKUS - Defence
  3. By the numbers | AUKUS timeline | United States Studies Centre
  4. AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine pathway | Defence Ministers
  5. Nuclear-powered submarines - Royal Australian Navy
  6. AUKUS - Australian Submarine Agency
  7. Skilled Worker English Language Guide 2025 - DavidsonMorris
  8. Timeline: How the AUKUS deal came together - Financial Review

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Trump's ex- wife Ivana wasn't an American citizen until 1988. She gave birth to Don Jr in 1977, Ivanka in 19Jeffrey Epstein Was Recorded Talking About Trump Before His Arrest Before he died under mysterious circumstances, Jeffrey Epstein was recorded talking about Donald Trump — and what he said was damning. In an audio recording released by journalist Michael Wolff, Epstein described how Trump manipulated his own team inside the White House. The conversation, recorded...81, & Eric in 1984. Let's cancel their birthright citizen ship first. -Andrea Junker
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump's ex- wife Ivana wasn't an American citizen until 1988. She gave birth to Don Jr in 1977, Ivanka in 19Jeffrey Epstein Was Recorded Talking About Trump Before His Arrest Before he died under mysterious circumstances, Jeffrey Epstein was recorded talking about Donald Trump — and what he said was damning. In an audio recording released by journalist Michael Wolff, Epstein described how Trump manipulated his own team inside the White House. The conversation, recorded...81, & Eric in 1984. Let's cancel their birthright citizen ship first. -Andrea Junker

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's ex- wife Ivana wasn't an American citizen until 1988. She gave birth to Don Jr in 1977, Ivanka in 19Jeffrey Epstein Was Recorded Talking About Trump Before His Arrest Before he died under mysterious circumstances, Jeffrey Epstein was recorded talking about Donald Trump — and what he said was damning. In an audio recording released by journalist Michael Wolff, Epstein described how Trump manipulated his own team inside the White House. The conversation, recorded...81, & Eric in 1984. Let's cancel their birthright citizen ship first. -Andrea Junker

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's ex- wife Ivana wasn't an American citizen until 1988. She gave birth to Don Jr in 1977, Ivanka in 1981, & Eric in 1984. Let's cancel their birthright citizen ship first. -Andrea Junker
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump's ex- wife Ivana wasn't an American citizen until 1988. She gave birth to Don Jr in 1977, Ivanka in 1981, & Eric in 1984. Let's cancel their birthright citizen ship first. -Andrea Junker

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's ex- wife Ivana wasn't an American citizen until 1988. She gave birth to Don Jr in 1977, Ivanka in 1981, & Eric in 1984. Let's cancel their birthright citizen ship first. -Andrea Junker

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donald Trump promised "no tax on tips" during his campaign, and his "big, beautiful bill" actually followed through on that promise until you read the fine print. While Trump is out bragging about no longer having tax on tipped wages, the REAL language of the bill shows that only the first $25,000 of tipped wages are eligible as a "deduction, not a complete reduction on taxes. The whole thing was a scam from the beginning.
Partially True

Fact Check: Donald Trump promised "no tax on tips" during his campaign, and his "big, beautiful bill" actually followed through on that promise until you read the fine print. While Trump is out bragging about no longer having tax on tipped wages, the REAL language of the bill shows that only the first $25,000 of tipped wages are eligible as a "deduction, not a complete reduction on taxes. The whole thing was a scam from the beginning.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donald Trump promised "no tax on tips" during his campaign, and his "big, beautiful bill" actually followed through on that promise until you read the fine print. While Trump is out bragging about no longer having tax on tipped wages, the REAL language of the bill shows that only the first $25,000 of tipped wages are eligible as a "deduction, not a complete reduction on taxes. The whole thing was a scam from the beginning.

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Hitler’s first legislative acts were bans on sexual “deviance” and usury (charging interest).
Partially True

Fact Check: Hitler’s first legislative acts were bans on sexual “deviance” and usury (charging interest).

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Hitler’s first legislative acts were bans on sexual “deviance” and usury (charging interest).

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
🔍
True

Fact Check: Jeffrey Epstein, seen as a friend of President Trump and former President Clinton, first faced sex crime charges related to underage girls in 2006 and 2007. Despite facing possible life imprisonment, prosecutor Alex Acosta, now Trump's Labor Secretary, struck a lenient plea deal, resulting in Epstein serving only months in a county jail for those charges. Prosecutors said they seized scores of photos of fully or partially nude girls connected to Epstein's trafficking ring.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Jeffrey Epstein, seen as a friend of President Trump and former President Clinton, first faced sex crime charges related to underage girls in 2006 and 2007. Despite facing possible life imprisonment, prosecutor Alex Acosta, now Trump's Labor Secretary, struck a lenient plea deal, resulting in Epstein serving only months in a county jail for those charges. Prosecutors said they seized scores of photos of fully or partially nude girls connected to Epstein's trafficking ring.

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks