TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Federal judge previously ordered Trump to relinquish control of National Guard troops.

Fact Check: Federal judge previously ordered Trump to relinquish control of National Guard troops.

Published June 18, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: Federal Judge Ordered Trump to Relinquish Control of National Guard Troops ## What We Know In June 2025, a significant legal dispute ar...

Fact Check: Federal Judge Ordered Trump to Relinquish Control of National Guard Troops

What We Know

In June 2025, a significant legal dispute arose regarding President Donald Trump's control over the California National Guard. A federal judge, Charles Breyer, ruled that Trump's deployment of the National Guard troops was illegal, stating that it violated the U.S. Constitution's division of powers and exceeded his statutory authority. Specifically, Breyer's ruling emphasized that the actions taken by Trump were unconstitutional under the Tenth Amendment, which delineates the powers of state and federal governments (NPR, AP News).

The judge ordered that control of the National Guard troops be returned to California Governor Gavin Newsom by midday on a Friday. This marked a rare instance of a president being ordered to relinquish control of state National Guard troops, a situation that had not occurred in over 60 years (NPR).

However, shortly after this ruling, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked the enforcement of Breyer's order, allowing Trump to maintain command of the troops while the case was under appeal (AP News, Politico).

Analysis

The ruling by Judge Breyer was based on a thorough examination of constitutional law, particularly regarding the limits of presidential authority over state National Guard units. Breyer's decision articulated that Trump's justification for deploying the National Guard—citing a rebellion against federal authority due to protests—was insufficient and did not meet the constitutional requirements for such a deployment (NPR).

Critically, the sources reporting on this event, including NPR and AP News, are generally regarded as reliable and adhere to journalistic standards. They provide detailed accounts of the legal proceedings and the implications of the rulings. However, the political context surrounding the events may introduce bias, particularly from sources that may favor one political perspective over another.

The appeals court's decision to block Breyer's ruling does not negate the fact that a federal judge did indeed order Trump to relinquish control of the National Guard. The temporary stay by the appeals court simply indicates that the legal battle was ongoing and that the final resolution had yet to be determined (Politico, NBC News).

Conclusion

The claim that a federal judge ordered Trump to relinquish control of the National Guard troops is True. Judge Breyer's ruling explicitly stated that Trump's actions were unconstitutional and directed that control of the troops be returned to the state governor. Although the appeals court later temporarily blocked this order, the initial ruling stands as a significant legal precedent regarding the limits of presidential authority over state military forces.

Sources

  1. Appeals court blocks earlier ruling, allows Trump to command ... - NPR
  2. Appeals court temporarily blocks judge's ruling to return ... - AP News
  3. What's Next for Trump and the National Guard in California After Court ... - New York Times
  4. Appeals court questions judges' ability to review Trump's ... - Reuters
  5. Appeals court lets Trump keep National Guard in Los Angeles - Politico
  6. Trump administration can keep control of California National Guard ... - NBC News
  7. Appeals court seems poised to side with Trump on ... - Politico
  8. Trump administration can deploy National Guard to Los ... - CBS News

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: A recently leaked federal study found that refugees to America brought in $63 billion more in government revenues than they cost in the last 10 years. Trump chief policy adviser Stephen Miller banned the release-of the study, because it contradicts his claim that refugees are too costly. Pass it on!
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: A recently leaked federal study found that refugees to America brought in $63 billion more in government revenues than they cost in the last 10 years. Trump chief policy adviser Stephen Miller banned the release-of the study, because it contradicts his claim that refugees are too costly. Pass it on!

Detailed fact-check analysis of: A recently leaked federal study found that refugees to America brought in $63 billion more in government revenues than they cost in the last 10 years. Trump chief policy adviser Stephen Miller banned the release-of the study, because it contradicts his claim that refugees are too costly. Pass it on!

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Trump administration placed immigrants in federal prisons for immigration violations.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Trump administration placed immigrants in federal prisons for immigration violations.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Trump administration placed immigrants in federal prisons for immigration violations.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's administration has proposed cutting federal funding for basic scientific research by a third.
True

Fact Check: Trump's administration has proposed cutting federal funding for basic scientific research by a third.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's administration has proposed cutting federal funding for basic scientific research by a third.

Jul 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump claimed on the campaign trail that he knew nothing about Project 2025 — yet just six months into his term, he’s already pushed through 46% of its radical agenda to reshape the federal government.
Partially True

Fact Check: Trump claimed on the campaign trail that he knew nothing about Project 2025 — yet just six months into his term, he’s already pushed through 46% of its radical agenda to reshape the federal government.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump claimed on the campaign trail that he knew nothing about Project 2025 — yet just six months into his term, he’s already pushed through 46% of its radical agenda to reshape the federal government.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
🔍
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I'm Christy Nome here in Texas with my boots on the ground after this devastating tragedy that was absolutely not preventable and we are in no way responsible for it after visiting here I recently found out that Habius Corpus is the name of a city here in Texas and is in fact not a legal term which means the president can do whatever he wants. I have been told by some people that in addition to being the Secretary of Homeland Security that does also make me the head of Fema Fema sounds like female or feminism and that's DEI and 00:34 I don't believe in that. President Trump has entrusted me to be in charge of Fema which is not a federal emergency management agency. In fact, all emergencies are actually being managed by the state and the reason why I am here is to make sure to get some good film for my B roll. It is completely disgusting that there are people out there who are trying to politicize the devastation that happened here in Texas and I would like to remind everyone that it is only okay to politicize natural disasters when they happen in 01:04 blue states.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I'm Christy Nome here in Texas with my boots on the ground after this devastating tragedy that was absolutely not preventable and we are in no way responsible for it after visiting here I recently found out that Habius Corpus is the name of a city here in Texas and is in fact not a legal term which means the president can do whatever he wants. I have been told by some people that in addition to being the Secretary of Homeland Security that does also make me the head of Fema Fema sounds like female or feminism and that's DEI and 00:34 I don't believe in that. President Trump has entrusted me to be in charge of Fema which is not a federal emergency management agency. In fact, all emergencies are actually being managed by the state and the reason why I am here is to make sure to get some good film for my B roll. It is completely disgusting that there are people out there who are trying to politicize the devastation that happened here in Texas and I would like to remind everyone that it is only okay to politicize natural disasters when they happen in 01:04 blue states.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Federal judge previously ordered Trump to relinquish control of National Guard troops. | TruthOrFake Blog