TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Farenthold was elected in 2010, defeating a long-serving Democrat.

Fact Check: Farenthold was elected in 2010, defeating a long-serving Democrat.

Published June 23, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Farenthold was elected in 2010, defeating a long-serving Democrat." ## What We Know Blake Farenthold, a member of the Republican Party...

Fact Check: "Farenthold was elected in 2010, defeating a long-serving Democrat."

What We Know

Blake Farenthold, a member of the Republican Party, was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2010, defeating the incumbent Democrat Solomon Ortiz. Farenthold won the election by a narrow margin of 799 votes, receiving 47.85% of the vote compared to Ortiz's 47.1% (Blake Farenthold - Wikipedia). Ortiz had served as a U.S. representative since 1983 and was known for his long tenure in Congress, making him a significant figure in Texas politics (Solomon Ortiz - Wikipedia). The election was notable as it marked the end of Ortiz's 27-year career in the House, during which he had been re-elected multiple times with substantial margins (Blake Farenthold - Wikipedia, HuffPost).

Analysis

The claim that Farenthold was elected in 2010 by defeating a long-serving Democrat is accurate. The election results show that Farenthold's victory was a significant upset, as Ortiz had been a well-established politician in the district for decades. The redistricting that occurred after the 2010 census played a crucial role in this election, as it made the district more favorable to Republican candidates, contributing to Ortiz's defeat (Blake Farenthold - Wikipedia, Texas Tribune).

The sources used in this analysis are credible, primarily relying on Wikipedia entries that summarize the political careers of both Farenthold and Ortiz. While Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, the information presented is consistent with multiple news reports and analyses from reputable outlets, such as HuffPost and Texas Tribune, which corroborate the details of the election and the significance of Ortiz's long tenure (HuffPost, Texas Tribune).

Overall, the evidence supports the claim that Farenthold's election was a pivotal moment in Texas politics, marking a shift from a long-standing Democratic representation to a Republican one.

Conclusion

Verdict: True
The claim that "Farenthold was elected in 2010, defeating a long-serving Democrat" is true. Blake Farenthold's victory over Solomon Ortiz in the 2010 election not only ended Ortiz's lengthy career in Congress but also highlighted a significant political shift in the district due to redistricting and changing voter demographics.

Sources

  1. Blake Farenthold - Wikipedia
  2. Solomon Ortiz - Wikipedia
  3. Blake Farenthold - Simple English Wikipedia
  4. In 2010, Blake Farenthold beat a Texas Democrat who seemed invincible ...
  5. Blake Farenthold Beats Solomon Ortiz: Democratic Congressman ... - HuffPost
  6. 4. TX-27: Farenthold Stuns Veteran Rep. Ortiz - RealClearPolitics

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Farenthold was elected in 2010, defeating a long-serving Democratic incumbent.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Farenthold was elected in 2010, defeating a long-serving Democratic incumbent.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Farenthold was elected in 2010, defeating a long-serving Democratic incumbent.

Jun 22, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Farenthold upset a long-serving Democrat to win his seat in 2010.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Farenthold upset a long-serving Democrat to win his seat in 2010.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Farenthold upset a long-serving Democrat to win his seat in 2010.

Jun 22, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Farenthold's political career ended after seven years of controversy.
True

Fact Check: Farenthold's political career ended after seven years of controversy.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Farenthold's political career ended after seven years of controversy.

Jun 24, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Farenthold ran a radio show until his death.
True

Fact Check: Farenthold ran a radio show until his death.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Farenthold ran a radio show until his death.

Jun 23, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Farenthold's political career ended after a shocking sexual harassment scandal.
True

Fact Check: Farenthold's political career ended after a shocking sexual harassment scandal.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Farenthold's political career ended after a shocking sexual harassment scandal.

Jun 23, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Farenthold was elected in 2010, defeating a long-serving Democrat. | TruthOrFake Blog