Fact Check: Fantastic beasts film series failure can contributed to JK Rowling writting problems such as Characters representation like Newt salamender and heavily focus on relationship between Dumbledore and Grindelwald

Fact Check: "Fantastic Beasts Film Series Failure Can Be Contributed to J.K. Rowling's Writing Problems"

What We Know

The Fantastic Beasts film series, a prequel to the Harry Potter franchise, has faced significant criticism for its portrayal of characters and narrative focus. Critics argue that J.K. Rowling's approach to character representation, particularly regarding LGBTQ+ and POC characters, has been problematic. For instance, an article from Gizmodo notes that Rowling's attempts to represent cultures outside her own have often resulted in "basic mistakes" and a lack of sensitivity, leading to backlash. The article highlights that Rowling's portrayal of American magical history and cultures has been criticized for being tone-deaf and historically inaccurate.

Moreover, the series has been criticized for sidelining its main character, Newt Scamander, in favor of a narrative centered around Dumbledore and Grindelwald. According to a review on The Brandeis Hoot, the films increasingly focus on Dumbledore's conflict with Grindelwald, diminishing Newt's role to that of a supporting character. This shift has led to dissatisfaction among fans who expected a narrative centered on Newt and the magical creatures he studies.

Analysis

The claim that the failure of the Fantastic Beasts series can be attributed to Rowling's writing problems, particularly in character representation and narrative focus, holds merit. Critics have pointed out that Rowling's attempts to expand the Wizarding World have often lacked depth and sensitivity. For example, her portrayal of diverse characters has been described as "outdated and tragic," failing to create empathetic representations (VICE). This lack of nuanced character development has contributed to the series' overall reception and success.

Additionally, the narrative focus on Dumbledore and Grindelwald has been seen as a significant misstep. As noted in the review from The Brandeis Hoot, Newt Scamander, who is intended to be the protagonist, is often relegated to a secondary role, undermining the film's original premise. This shift not only confuses the narrative but also alienates viewers who were drawn to the series for its exploration of magical creatures and Newt's character.

However, it is essential to consider the broader context of the Fantastic Beasts series' failure. Factors such as Rowling's controversies and public perception have also played a role in diminishing the franchise's appeal (CBR). The combination of narrative missteps and external controversies has created a challenging environment for the series.

Conclusion

The claim that the failure of the Fantastic Beasts film series can be attributed to J.K. Rowling's writing problems, particularly regarding character representation and narrative focus, is Partially True. While there are valid criticisms of Rowling's approach to diversity and character development, the series' failure cannot be solely attributed to these issues. External factors, including Rowling's controversies and the shifting expectations of the audience, have also significantly impacted the franchise's reception.

Sources

1. How Fantastic Beasts Failed at Representation, and What J.K ...
2. FANTASTIC BEASTS is Treating a Gay Dumbledore Like ...
3. Dumbledore and bad writing ruined 'Fantastic Beasts'
4. In 'Fantastic Beasts,' J.K. Rowling Fails at Writing ...
5. Why Fantastic Beasts Wasn't as Successful as Harry Potter
6. Why 'Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald' was ...
7. Fantastic Beasts' Biggest Mistake Was the Downfall of the ...
8. Harry Potter's Failed Franchise Deserves Its Redemption