TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Family claims decision to keep mother on life support was wrong.

Fact Check: Family claims decision to keep mother on life support was wrong.

Published June 17, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: Family Claims Decision to Keep Mother on Life Support Was Wrong ## What We Know Adriana Smith, a 31-year-old woman from Georgia, was de...

Fact Check: Family Claims Decision to Keep Mother on Life Support Was Wrong

What We Know

Adriana Smith, a 31-year-old woman from Georgia, was declared brain dead after a medical emergency while she was approximately eight weeks pregnant. Her family, particularly her mother April Newkirk, claimed that the decision to keep Smith on life support was dictated by Georgia's abortion laws, which prohibit most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy. According to reports, hospital officials informed the family that they could not remove Smith from life support due to these laws, which led to a significant public outcry and debate over the implications of such legislation on medical ethics and family rights (USA Today [source-1], ABC News [source-2]).

On June 13, 2025, Smith delivered a baby boy named Chance via emergency cesarean section. The baby weighed 1 pound, 13 ounces and was admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (11Alive [source-3]). Following the birth, Smith was expected to be removed from life support on June 17, 2025 (WALB [source-4]).

Georgia's abortion law, known as the "heartbeat law," restricts abortions after cardiac activity can be detected, generally around six weeks of pregnancy. The law has faced criticism for creating confusion among medical professionals regarding the care of patients in precarious situations (11Alive [source-5]).

Analysis

The family's assertion that the decision to keep Smith on life support was wrong is supported by several factors. Firstly, the hospital's claim that they were legally bound to keep Smith on life support due to the state's abortion laws raises significant ethical concerns. Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr stated that the law does not mandate keeping a brain-dead woman on life support, indicating that the hospital's interpretation of the law may have been overly cautious or incorrect (ABC News [source-2], 11Alive [source-5]).

Moreover, the emotional distress expressed by Newkirk, who described the situation as "torture," highlights the personal toll of such legal interpretations on families. The family's desire to make decisions regarding Smith's care, rather than having those decisions dictated by law, underscores the need for a more nuanced approach to medical ethics in the context of restrictive abortion laws (USA Today [source-1], WALB [source-4]).

The case has sparked a broader debate about the implications of restrictive abortion laws on medical practice and family rights, suggesting that the current legal framework may not adequately address the complexities of such situations (The Guardian [source-8]).

Conclusion

The claim that the decision to keep Adriana Smith on life support was wrong is True. The family's assertion is supported by statements from legal authorities indicating that the hospital's interpretation of the law may have been flawed. Furthermore, the emotional and ethical implications of such decisions highlight the need for a reevaluation of how restrictive abortion laws impact medical care and family autonomy.

Sources

  1. Ga. woman on life support due to abortion law delivers baby
  2. Baby delivered from brain-dead woman on life support in Georgia
  3. Baby delivered from brain-dead Georgia mother Adriana Smith
  4. Georgia mother to be removed from life support after giving birth while brain dead
  5. Adriana Smith, pregnant Georgia mother on life support
  6. Brain-dead Georgia woman kept on life support due to state's abortion law
  7. Brain Dead Mom Forced On Life Support Because Of Abortion Law
  8. Fetus of brain-dead Georgia woman kept alive due to abortion ban

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 We have some news right now. Ice detained a toddler, a mother, and a grandmother. All United States American citizens just because they overheard them speaking Spanish. According to Telamundo, Puerto Rico, these three American citizens were taken into custody in Milwaukee, Wisconsin after Ice agents overheard them speaking Spanish. This included a toddler. A member of their family says that they were taken into custody while shopping at a local department store. And they didn't have a chance to speak with Ice agents until they were at the detention facility. And when they arrived they tried to explain to Ice that they were born in Puerto Rico that they're American citizens. And 00:32 it wasn't until after they provided documentation of proof that Ice agents apologize and that they were eventually released. According to the Daily Beast Daryl Marine the national president of the Hispanic Advocacy Group Forward Latino has confirmed that these three individuals were detained by Ice. More and more American citizens are being caught up in these mass deportation rates
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 We have some news right now. Ice detained a toddler, a mother, and a grandmother. All United States American citizens just because they overheard them speaking Spanish. According to Telamundo, Puerto Rico, these three American citizens were taken into custody in Milwaukee, Wisconsin after Ice agents overheard them speaking Spanish. This included a toddler. A member of their family says that they were taken into custody while shopping at a local department store. And they didn't have a chance to speak with Ice agents until they were at the detention facility. And when they arrived they tried to explain to Ice that they were born in Puerto Rico that they're American citizens. And 00:32 it wasn't until after they provided documentation of proof that Ice agents apologize and that they were eventually released. According to the Daily Beast Daryl Marine the national president of the Hispanic Advocacy Group Forward Latino has confirmed that these three individuals were detained by Ice. More and more American citizens are being caught up in these mass deportation rates

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 We have some news right now. Ice detained a toddler, a mother, and a grandmother. All United States American citizens just because they overheard them speaking Spanish. According to Telamundo, Puerto Rico, these three American citizens were taken into custody in Milwaukee, Wisconsin after Ice agents overheard them speaking Spanish. This included a toddler. A member of their family says that they were taken into custody while shopping at a local department store. And they didn't have a chance to speak with Ice agents until they were at the detention facility. And when they arrived they tried to explain to Ice that they were born in Puerto Rico that they're American citizens. And 00:32 it wasn't until after they provided documentation of proof that Ice agents apologize and that they were eventually released. According to the Daily Beast Daryl Marine the national president of the Hispanic Advocacy Group Forward Latino has confirmed that these three individuals were detained by Ice. More and more American citizens are being caught up in these mass deportation rates

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Vance you flip flop faster than pages in the Bible. You talk a big game about Christian values but you support closing the border, deporting refugees, separating immigrant families, even building detention camps. You treat faith like a political tool. One day you use it to oppose same sex marriage. The next you use it to justify expansionism. On Sunday you're on your knees in church. On Monday you're backing Trump's America first agenda. In the of traditional family, you support 00:32 cutting aid for the poor. In the name of border security, you support violent enforcement against asylum seekers. That's not defending values that's wrapping cruelty in scripture. You say it's about protecting the country but I remember Jesus talked about welcoming
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Vance you flip flop faster than pages in the Bible. You talk a big game about Christian values but you support closing the border, deporting refugees, separating immigrant families, even building detention camps. You treat faith like a political tool. One day you use it to oppose same sex marriage. The next you use it to justify expansionism. On Sunday you're on your knees in church. On Monday you're backing Trump's America first agenda. In the of traditional family, you support 00:32 cutting aid for the poor. In the name of border security, you support violent enforcement against asylum seekers. That's not defending values that's wrapping cruelty in scripture. You say it's about protecting the country but I remember Jesus talked about welcoming

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 Vance you flip flop faster than pages in the Bible. You talk a big game about Christian values but you support closing the border, deporting refugees, separating immigrant families, even building detention camps. You treat faith like a political tool. One day you use it to oppose same sex marriage. The next you use it to justify expansionism. On Sunday you're on your knees in church. On Monday you're backing Trump's America first agenda. In the of traditional family, you support 00:32 cutting aid for the poor. In the name of border security, you support violent enforcement against asylum seekers. That's not defending values that's wrapping cruelty in scripture. You say it's about protecting the country but I remember Jesus talked about welcoming

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Did Death penalty supporters often frame this cause as the cause of support of right of victim's family when UN oppose this narrative ?
Partially True

Fact Check: Did Death penalty supporters often frame this cause as the cause of support of right of victim's family when UN oppose this narrative ?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Did Death penalty supporters often frame this cause as the cause of support of right of victim's family when UN oppose this narrative ?

Jul 5, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Iп a shockiпg tυrп of eveпts, Kiпg Charles, 76, is reportedly “livid” over a Chiпese spy scaпdal tied to his brother, Priпce Aпdrew, accordiпg to mυltiple soυrces from People aпd The Daily Beast. The coпtroversy, ceпtered oп the Dυke of York’s, 64, close bυsiпess ties with a Chiпese пatioпal accυsed of espioпage, has thrυst the British royal family iпto a firestorm of criticism. Bυt that’s пot all—a chilliпg assassiпatioп plot agaiпst Pope Fraпcis, revealed by the FBI oп April 21, 2025, is rockiпg the world, creatiпg a stark coпtrast betweeп royal drama aпd global crisis. Dive
True

Fact Check: Iп a shockiпg tυrп of eveпts, Kiпg Charles, 76, is reportedly “livid” over a Chiпese spy scaпdal tied to his brother, Priпce Aпdrew, accordiпg to mυltiple soυrces from People aпd The Daily Beast. The coпtroversy, ceпtered oп the Dυke of York’s, 64, close bυsiпess ties with a Chiпese пatioпal accυsed of espioпage, has thrυst the British royal family iпto a firestorm of criticism. Bυt that’s пot all—a chilliпg assassiпatioп plot agaiпst Pope Fraпcis, revealed by the FBI oп April 21, 2025, is rockiпg the world, creatiпg a stark coпtrast betweeп royal drama aпd global crisis. Dive

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Iп a shockiпg tυrп of eveпts, Kiпg Charles, 76, is reportedly “livid” over a Chiпese spy scaпdal tied to his brother, Priпce Aпdrew, accordiпg to mυltiple soυrces from People aпd The Daily Beast. The coпtroversy, ceпtered oп the Dυke of York’s, 64, close bυsiпess ties with a Chiпese пatioпal accυsed of espioпage, has thrυst the British royal family iпto a firestorm of criticism. Bυt that’s пot all—a chilliпg assassiпatioп plot agaiпst Pope Fraпcis, revealed by the FBI oп April 21, 2025, is rockiпg the world, creatiпg a stark coпtrast betweeп royal drama aпd global crisis. Dive

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Canadian antiwoke christian farmer family who emigrated into Russia saw their bank account being frozen.
True

Fact Check: Canadian antiwoke christian farmer family who emigrated into Russia saw their bank account being frozen.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Canadian antiwoke christian farmer family who emigrated into Russia saw their bank account being frozen.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Family claims decision to keep mother on life support was wrong. | TruthOrFake Blog