TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Emil Bove was responsible for dismissing the criminal case against New York Mayor Eric Adams, which was criticized by the presiding judge as 'unsupported by any objective evidence' and 'pretextual.'

Fact Check: Emil Bove was responsible for dismissing the criminal case against New York Mayor Eric Adams, which was criticized by the presiding judge as 'unsupported by any objective evidence' and 'pretextual.'

June 16, 2025•by TruthOrFake AI
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: Emil Bove's Role in Dismissing the Criminal Case Against Eric Adams ## What We Know The criminal case against New York City Mayor Eric ...

Fact Check: Emil Bove's Role in Dismissing the Criminal Case Against Eric Adams

What We Know

The criminal case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams was dismissed by a federal judge, with the dismissal being influenced by a directive from Emil Bove, the acting deputy attorney general at the time. Bove ordered New York prosecutors to drop the case, arguing that it hindered Adams' ability to address key issues such as illegal immigration and violent crime, which were priorities for the Trump administration (BBC, NPR).

The judge, Dale Ho, criticized the rationale provided by the Justice Department for the dismissal, describing it as "unsupported by any objective evidence" and "pretextual" (NPR, Politico). The case was dismissed "with prejudice," meaning it cannot be refiled, which reflects the judge's concern that the dismissal could create a perception of a quid pro quo arrangement between Adams and the Trump administration (BBC, NPR).

Analysis

Emil Bove's directive to drop the case against Eric Adams has been a point of contention. Critics, including Manhattan's top federal prosecutor Danielle Sassoon, resigned in protest, claiming there was no legal justification for the dismissal (NPR). Sassoon alleged that the dismissal was part of a deal where Adams would support the administration's immigration policies in exchange for dropping the charges, which Bove denied (Washington Post, ABC News).

Judge Ho's ruling highlighted the problematic nature of the dismissal, suggesting that it appeared to be a bargain rather than a legitimate legal decision. He stated, "Everything here smacks of a bargain: dismissal of the Indictment in exchange for immigration policy concessions" (NPR, Politico). This critical perspective on Bove's actions raises questions about the integrity of the decision-making process within the Justice Department during the Trump administration.

The sources used in this analysis are credible, including major news outlets like BBC and NPR, which provide detailed accounts of the events and the judicial ruling. However, the political context surrounding the case and the involvement of the Trump administration adds a layer of complexity that may influence interpretations of Bove's actions.

Conclusion

The claim that Emil Bove was responsible for dismissing the criminal case against New York Mayor Eric Adams, which was criticized by the presiding judge as "unsupported by any objective evidence" and "pretextual," is True. Bove's directive to drop the case was a significant factor in the dismissal, and the judge's ruling reflects serious concerns about the motivations behind that decision.

Sources

  1. Judge permanently dismisses criminal case against NYC ...
  2. Federal judge drops corruption case against New York City Mayor Eric ...
  3. Read the Senators' Letter About Emil Bove
  4. Judge puts off decision on dropping charges against NY Mayor Adams
  5. Acting deputy AG Emil Bove defends move to drop Eric ...
  6. Emil Bove denies 'quid pro quo' in dropping Eric Adams charges during ...
  7. The Next Conservative Civil War Is Coming - POLITICO
  8. NYC Mayor Eric Adams' historic corruption case dismissed as judge sides ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Donald Trump nominated Emil Bove, formerly his criminal defense lawyer, to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on June 16, 2025.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Donald Trump nominated Emil Bove, formerly his criminal defense lawyer, to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on June 16, 2025.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donald Trump nominated Emil Bove, formerly his criminal defense lawyer, to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on June 16, 2025.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Article III Project has produced a stream of articles supporting Emil Bove's nomination, arguing he would be a reliable supporter of Trump's political agenda.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Article III Project has produced a stream of articles supporting Emil Bove's nomination, arguing he would be a reliable supporter of Trump's political agenda.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Article III Project has produced a stream of articles supporting Emil Bove's nomination, arguing he would be a reliable supporter of Trump's political agenda.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Prominent members of the conservative legal movement have publicly opposed Emil Bove's nomination, arguing he would be more loyal to Trump than to the rule of law.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Prominent members of the conservative legal movement have publicly opposed Emil Bove's nomination, arguing he would be more loyal to Trump than to the rule of law.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Prominent members of the conservative legal movement have publicly opposed Emil Bove's nomination, arguing he would be more loyal to Trump than to the rule of law.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Senator Mike Lee from Utah supports the nomination of Emil Bove and looks forward to voting for him.
Needs Research

Fact Check: Senator Mike Lee from Utah supports the nomination of Emil Bove and looks forward to voting for him.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Senator Mike Lee from Utah supports the nomination of Emil Bove and looks forward to voting for him.

Jun 16, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Mar 24, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Emil Bove was responsible for dismissing the criminal case against New York Mayor Eric Adams, which was criticized by the presiding judge as 'unsupported by any objective evidence' and 'pretextual.' | TruthOrFake Blog