Fact Check: Economic upheaval can affect political approval ratings.

Fact Check: Economic upheaval can affect political approval ratings.

Published July 1, 2025
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: Economic upheaval can affect political approval ratings ## What We Know The claim that "economic upheaval can affect political approval...

Fact Check: Economic upheaval can affect political approval ratings

What We Know

The claim that "economic upheaval can affect political approval ratings" is supported by various studies and analyses. A significant paper by Gómez-Méndez and Hansen investigates the relationship between economic policy uncertainty and presidential approval in four Latin American countries: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico. Their findings indicate that economic policy uncertainty negatively impacts presidential approval ratings, with a one-standard-deviation increase in economic uncertainty leading to approximately a 12% decrease in approval ratings (source-1). This aligns with established political economy models which suggest that voters are less likely to support incumbents during periods of economic uncertainty.

Furthermore, literature on economic perceptions and political approval indicates that citizens often prioritize the state of the economy when evaluating government performance (source-1). In the U.S., for example, economic conditions have been shown to correlate strongly with presidential approval ratings, as demonstrated by various polls and studies (source-6, source-7).

Analysis

The evidence supporting the claim is robust, particularly from the study conducted by Gómez-Méndez and Hansen, which utilizes empirical data and sophisticated statistical methods to analyze the impact of economic policy uncertainty on presidential approval (source-1). The authors employ a panel data approach, which enhances the reliability of their findings by accounting for variations across different countries and time periods.

Moreover, the study's conclusion that economic uncertainty leads to decreased approval ratings is consistent with broader trends observed in both high-income and low-income economies. For instance, in the U.S., fluctuations in economic confidence have been directly linked to changes in presidential approval ratings, particularly during times of economic distress (source-6, source-8).

However, it is important to note that while the evidence is compelling, the relationship can be influenced by other factors, such as political scandals or foreign policy crises, which can also affect public perception and approval ratings. The complexity of voter behavior means that while economic conditions are a significant factor, they are not the sole determinant of political approval.

Conclusion

The claim that economic upheaval can affect political approval ratings is True. The evidence from empirical studies, particularly in the context of Latin American countries, demonstrates a clear negative correlation between economic policy uncertainty and presidential approval ratings. This relationship is further supported by findings from high-income economies, including the U.S., where economic conditions significantly influence public perceptions of government performance.

Sources

  1. Economic policy uncertainty and presidential approval: Evidence from Latin America - Link
  2. محافظة خليص - ويكيبيديا - Link
  3. Cyprus - Wikipedia - Link
  4. قائمة الدول والتبعيات حسب المساحة - ويكيبيديا - Link
  5. قبرص - ويكيبيديا - Link
  6. Economic ratings and concerns | Pew Research Center - Link
  7. U.S. Economic Confidence Slightly Improved, Still Negative - Link
  8. Trump approval ratings fall on economic turmoil, poll finds - Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: The image presents a political meme contrasting economic indicators from "6 months ago" and "Today" in relation to a statement attributed to Donald Trump about the state of the country.
Claim Attributed to Trump: The meme states that "Trump just said that 6 months ago we had a dead country and people didn't think we would survive."
Economic Data - 6 Months Ago:
GDP: +2.8%
Dow Jones: 45,014
S&P 500: 6,086
Gas Prices: $3.03
Economic Data - Today:
GDP: -.03%
Dow Jones: 42,098
S&P 500: 5,888
Gas Prices: $3.14
Visual Representation: The image includes side-by-side photos of Joe Biden and Donald Trump, positioned above the respective economic data sets.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The image presents a political meme contrasting economic indicators from "6 months ago" and "Today" in relation to a statement attributed to Donald Trump about the state of the country. Claim Attributed to Trump: The meme states that "Trump just said that 6 months ago we had a dead country and people didn't think we would survive." Economic Data - 6 Months Ago: GDP: +2.8% Dow Jones: 45,014 S&P 500: 6,086 Gas Prices: $3.03 Economic Data - Today: GDP: -.03% Dow Jones: 42,098 S&P 500: 5,888 Gas Prices: $3.14 Visual Representation: The image includes side-by-side photos of Joe Biden and Donald Trump, positioned above the respective economic data sets.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The image presents a political meme contrasting economic indicators from "6 months ago" and "Today" in relation to a statement attributed to Donald Trump about the state of the country. Claim Attributed to Trump: The meme states that "Trump just said that 6 months ago we had a dead country and people didn't think we would survive." Economic Data - 6 Months Ago: GDP: +2.8% Dow Jones: 45,014 S&P 500: 6,086 Gas Prices: $3.03 Economic Data - Today: GDP: -.03% Dow Jones: 42,098 S&P 500: 5,888 Gas Prices: $3.14 Visual Representation: The image includes side-by-side photos of Joe Biden and Donald Trump, positioned above the respective economic data sets.

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The U.S. is spending vastly more on Pentagon (military) budgets — about $8.3 trillion over 10 years — while more modest sums (~$1.9T for COVID stimulus, ~$550B for infrastructure, ~$1.75T for reconciliation) have been allocated toward Biden's economic agenda, depicted as dwarfed by military spending.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The U.S. is spending vastly more on Pentagon (military) budgets — about $8.3 trillion over 10 years — while more modest sums (~$1.9T for COVID stimulus, ~$550B for infrastructure, ~$1.75T for reconciliation) have been allocated toward Biden's economic agenda, depicted as dwarfed by military spending.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The U.S. is spending vastly more on Pentagon (military) budgets — about $8.3 trillion over 10 years — while more modest sums (~$1.9T for COVID stimulus, ~$550B for infrastructure, ~$1.75T for reconciliation) have been allocated toward Biden's economic agenda, depicted as dwarfed by military spending.

Aug 23, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Democratic strategists are praying for an economic depression to improve party popularity.
True

Fact Check: Democratic strategists are praying for an economic depression to improve party popularity.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Democratic strategists are praying for an economic depression to improve party popularity.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's economic policies primarily benefit the wealthy while adding to federal debt.
True

Fact Check: Trump's economic policies primarily benefit the wealthy while adding to federal debt.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's economic policies primarily benefit the wealthy while adding to federal debt.

Jul 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Cutting unnecessary red tape is essential to unlocking Canada's full economic potential.
True

Fact Check: Cutting unnecessary red tape is essential to unlocking Canada's full economic potential.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Cutting unnecessary red tape is essential to unlocking Canada's full economic potential.

Jul 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Economic upheaval can affect political approval ratings. | TruthOrFake Blog