TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Dwight Eisenhower was the first Supreme Commander of NATO.

Fact Check: Dwight Eisenhower was the first Supreme Commander of NATO.

Published July 2, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Dwight Eisenhower was the first Supreme Commander of NATO." ## What We Know Dwight D. Eisenhower was indeed the first Supreme Commande...

Fact Check: "Dwight Eisenhower was the first Supreme Commander of NATO."

What We Know

Dwight D. Eisenhower was indeed the first Supreme Commander of NATO, a position he assumed on December 19, 1950. This appointment came shortly after the establishment of NATO, which was formed on April 4, 1949, as a collective defense alliance among the United States, Canada, and ten European nations to counter Soviet expansion (source-1, source-6). Eisenhower's military career prior to this role included serving as the Supreme Allied Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force during World War II, where he played a pivotal role in the success of the Normandy Invasion and other key operations in Europe (source-4, source-5).

Analysis

The claim that Eisenhower was the first Supreme Commander of NATO is supported by multiple credible sources. The NATO website confirms that Eisenhower was appointed as the Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) and was responsible for establishing the Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) (source-6). This historical context is further reinforced by publications detailing Eisenhower's military career and contributions to NATO (source-3, source-7).

While some sources critique Eisenhower's leadership during World War II, they do not dispute his role as NATO's first Supreme Commander (source-2). The reliability of the sources used in this analysis is high, as they include official NATO documentation, historical accounts, and peer-reviewed articles, all of which provide a comprehensive view of Eisenhower's military legacy.

Conclusion

The claim that "Dwight Eisenhower was the first Supreme Commander of NATO" is True. The evidence clearly demonstrates that Eisenhower held this position starting in December 1950 and played a crucial role in shaping NATO's early structure and mission. His prior experience as a military leader during World War II further solidified his qualifications for this significant role in the post-war era.

Sources

  1. Waging Peace: Eisenhower and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
  2. Eisenhower as Supreme Allied Commander: A Reappraisal
  3. How Dwight D. Eisenhower Helped Shape NATO While ...
  4. Dwight D. Eisenhower - Wikipedia
  5. Military career of Dwight D. Eisenhower
  6. History of Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR)
  7. NATO - Declassified: General Eisenhower, 1950 - 1952

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Dwight D. Eisenhower was part black.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Dwight D. Eisenhower was part black.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Dwight D. Eisenhower was part black.

Mar 18, 2025
Read more →
🔍
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Jeffrey Epstein, seen as a friend of President Trump and former President Clinton, first faced sex crime charges related to underage girls in 2006 and 2007. Despite facing possible life imprisonment, prosecutor Alex Acosta, now Trump's Labor Secretary, struck a lenient plea deal, resulting in Epstein serving only months in a county jail for those charges. Prosecutors said they seized scores of photos of fully or partially nude girls connected to Epstein's trafficking ring.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Jeffrey Epstein, seen as a friend of President Trump and former President Clinton, first faced sex crime charges related to underage girls in 2006 and 2007. Despite facing possible life imprisonment, prosecutor Alex Acosta, now Trump's Labor Secretary, struck a lenient plea deal, resulting in Epstein serving only months in a county jail for those charges. Prosecutors said they seized scores of photos of fully or partially nude girls connected to Epstein's trafficking ring.

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Our partner, The Dinah Project, just released a groundbreaking report confirming that Hamas used sexual violence as a weapon of war on October 7. The findings are horrifying: gang rape, mutilation, and systematic executions of Israeli women. The report is backed by forensic evidence, hostage testimonies, and first responder accounts.
True

Fact Check: Our partner, The Dinah Project, just released a groundbreaking report confirming that Hamas used sexual violence as a weapon of war on October 7. The findings are horrifying: gang rape, mutilation, and systematic executions of Israeli women. The report is backed by forensic evidence, hostage testimonies, and first responder accounts.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Our partner, The Dinah Project, just released a groundbreaking report confirming that Hamas used sexual violence as a weapon of war on October 7. The findings are horrifying: gang rape, mutilation, and systematic executions of Israeli women. The report is backed by forensic evidence, hostage testimonies, and first responder accounts.

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's ex- wife Ivana wasn't an American citizen until 1988. She gave birth to Don Jr in 1977, Ivanka in 19Jeffrey Epstein Was Recorded Talking About Trump Before His Arrest Before he died under mysterious circumstances, Jeffrey Epstein was recorded talking about Donald Trump — and what he said was damning. In an audio recording released by journalist Michael Wolff, Epstein described how Trump manipulated his own team inside the White House. The conversation, recorded...81, & Eric in 1984. Let's cancel their birthright citizen ship first. -Andrea Junker
True

Fact Check: Trump's ex- wife Ivana wasn't an American citizen until 1988. She gave birth to Don Jr in 1977, Ivanka in 19Jeffrey Epstein Was Recorded Talking About Trump Before His Arrest Before he died under mysterious circumstances, Jeffrey Epstein was recorded talking about Donald Trump — and what he said was damning. In an audio recording released by journalist Michael Wolff, Epstein described how Trump manipulated his own team inside the White House. The conversation, recorded...81, & Eric in 1984. Let's cancel their birthright citizen ship first. -Andrea Junker

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's ex- wife Ivana wasn't an American citizen until 1988. She gave birth to Don Jr in 1977, Ivanka in 19Jeffrey Epstein Was Recorded Talking About Trump Before His Arrest Before he died under mysterious circumstances, Jeffrey Epstein was recorded talking about Donald Trump — and what he said was damning. In an audio recording released by journalist Michael Wolff, Epstein described how Trump manipulated his own team inside the White House. The conversation, recorded...81, & Eric in 1984. Let's cancel their birthright citizen ship first. -Andrea Junker

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's ex- wife Ivana wasn't an American citizen until 1988. She gave birth to Don Jr in 1977, Ivanka in 1981, & Eric in 1984. Let's cancel their birthright citizen ship first. -Andrea Junker
True

Fact Check: Trump's ex- wife Ivana wasn't an American citizen until 1988. She gave birth to Don Jr in 1977, Ivanka in 1981, & Eric in 1984. Let's cancel their birthright citizen ship first. -Andrea Junker

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's ex- wife Ivana wasn't an American citizen until 1988. She gave birth to Don Jr in 1977, Ivanka in 1981, & Eric in 1984. Let's cancel their birthright citizen ship first. -Andrea Junker

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks