Fact Check: During the Opium wars, the British joined the war on drugs, on the side of the drugs

Fact Check: During the Opium wars, the British joined the war on drugs, on the side of the drugs

Published May 25, 2025
VERDICT
False

# The Claim: "During the Opium wars, the British joined the war on drugs, on the side of the drugs" ## 1. Introduction The claim that "during the Opi...

The Claim: "During the Opium wars, the British joined the war on drugs, on the side of the drugs"

1. Introduction

The claim that "during the Opium wars, the British joined the war on drugs, on the side of the drugs" suggests a paradoxical involvement of Britain in promoting drug trade while simultaneously engaging in military conflict. This assertion implies that British actions during the Opium Wars were not merely about trade rights but were also aligned with the interests of the opium trade itself. This article examines the historical context of the Opium Wars, the motivations behind British actions, and the implications of the opium trade in 19th-century China.

2. What We Know

The Opium Wars, comprising the First Opium War (1839-1842) and the Second Opium War (1856-1860), were primarily conflicts between Britain and China over trade rights and the illegal opium trade. The British East India Company played a significant role in exporting opium from India to China, leading to widespread addiction and social disruption in China 23.

  • First Opium War: Triggered by China's efforts to suppress the opium trade, the war resulted in the Treaty of Nanking, which forced China to cede Hong Kong to Britain and open several ports to British trade 46.
  • Second Opium War: This conflict further expanded British commercial privileges in China, with opium remaining a central issue despite not being officially legalized 9.

The British government and traders were motivated by economic interests, as the opium trade was highly profitable and funded various aspects of British imperialism 710.

3. Analysis

The claim that Britain "joined the war on drugs, on the side of the drugs" can be dissected through various lenses:

  • Economic Interests: Sources indicate that British involvement in the opium trade was primarily driven by economic gain. The profits from opium sales were substantial, and British traders sought to protect these interests through military means 35. This suggests that Britain's military actions were indeed aligned with the interests of the drug trade, as they aimed to maintain and expand the opium market in China.

  • Historical Context: The Opium Wars occurred during a time when Western powers were expanding their influence in Asia. The British justification for their military actions often revolved around the concept of free trade and diplomatic rights, rather than an explicit endorsement of drug use 24. This raises questions about the framing of Britain's role as a "war on drugs"—while they fought to protect the opium trade, they simultaneously presented their actions as efforts to uphold trade rights.

  • Source Reliability: The sources consulted vary in reliability. Academic sources like the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's analysis 1 and the Encyclopaedia Britannica 3 provide well-researched historical accounts. However, articles from platforms like HistoryNet 5 and History Today 7 may contain biases based on their narrative styles and target audiences. Wikipedia 2 offers a broad overview but may lack the depth and citations of more scholarly sources.

  • Conflicts of Interest: Some sources may have inherent biases. For example, historical narratives that emphasize British imperialism might downplay the complexities of the opium trade's impact on China, while those focusing on the negative consequences may overlook the economic motivations behind British actions.

  • Methodological Concerns: The historical analysis of the Opium Wars often relies on retrospective interpretations of colonial motivations. A more nuanced understanding would benefit from examining primary sources from the period, including British governmental documents and Chinese records, to assess the motivations behind military actions more accurately.

4. Conclusion

Verdict: False

The claim that "during the Opium wars, the British joined the war on drugs, on the side of the drugs" is misleading. While it is true that British military actions during the Opium Wars were motivated by the desire to protect and expand the opium trade, framing this as a "war on drugs" misrepresents the historical context. The British were primarily engaged in conflicts over trade rights rather than an explicit endorsement of drug use.

Key evidence supporting this verdict includes the economic motivations behind British involvement in the opium trade and the justification of military actions as efforts to uphold free trade and diplomatic rights. However, it is important to acknowledge that the historical narrative is complex, and interpretations can vary based on the sources consulted.

Limitations in the available evidence include potential biases in historical accounts and the reliance on retrospective interpretations of motivations. Further research into primary sources could provide a more nuanced understanding of the events.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider multiple perspectives when examining historical claims.

5. Sources

  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "THE OPIUM TRADE Introduction." Link
  2. Wikipedia. "Opium Wars." Link
  3. Encyclopaedia Britannica. "Opium trade | China, History, Wars, & Facts." Link
  4. Encyclopaedia Britannica. "Opium Wars | Definition, Summary, Facts, & Causes." Link
  5. HistoryNet. "China's War on Drugs." Link
  6. History Defined. "The Opium Wars: The Substance That Started a Trade War." Link
  7. History Today. "The Opium Wars." Link
  8. HistoryExtra. "The Opium Wars Explained." Link
  9. Malorie's Adventures. "The Opium Wars: How Britain's Drug Trade Shaped the Fate of China." Link
  10. BBC News. "100 years of the war on drugs." Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: British companies delivered real returns to shareholders of 100% during World War II.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: British companies delivered real returns to shareholders of 100% during World War II.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: British companies delivered real returns to shareholders of 100% during World War II.

Jul 15, 2025
Read more →
🔍
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Aug 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Built on ancient Native American mounds near the meeting point of where the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers clash, the town sits at a natural crossroads. During the Civil War, that geography turned it into a vital Union stronghold. Mound City became home to one of the largest military hospitals in the West and served as a major naval station. Soldiers from both sides passed through some to recover, many not. It may be quiet now, but this place once pulsed with the urgency of life and death and sat at the crossroad of a nation at war with itself.

That history lingers most clearly at the Mound City National Cemetery, just beyond the edge of town. I wasn’t expecting to find it, and I certainly wasn’t expecting the names etched into some of the stones. Two men in particular stood out, John Basil Turchin and Alexander Bielaski. Both born in the Russian Empire. Both connected to Abraham Lincoln. Both now buried here, far from where they began.

John Basil Turchin (born Ivan Turchaninov) had once been a colonel in the Russian Imperial Army. He fought in the Crimean War before immigrating to the United States in 1856. When the Civil War broke out, he offered his experience to the Union cause with fierce conviction. His military background and abolitionist ideals caught Lincoln’s attention, and he was appointed a brigadier general, becoming the only Russian born general to serve in the Union Army. He died in 1901 and was laid to rest here, among the soldiers he once led, and some that he fought against.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Built on ancient Native American mounds near the meeting point of where the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers clash, the town sits at a natural crossroads. During the Civil War, that geography turned it into a vital Union stronghold. Mound City became home to one of the largest military hospitals in the West and served as a major naval station. Soldiers from both sides passed through some to recover, many not. It may be quiet now, but this place once pulsed with the urgency of life and death and sat at the crossroad of a nation at war with itself. That history lingers most clearly at the Mound City National Cemetery, just beyond the edge of town. I wasn’t expecting to find it, and I certainly wasn’t expecting the names etched into some of the stones. Two men in particular stood out, John Basil Turchin and Alexander Bielaski. Both born in the Russian Empire. Both connected to Abraham Lincoln. Both now buried here, far from where they began. John Basil Turchin (born Ivan Turchaninov) had once been a colonel in the Russian Imperial Army. He fought in the Crimean War before immigrating to the United States in 1856. When the Civil War broke out, he offered his experience to the Union cause with fierce conviction. His military background and abolitionist ideals caught Lincoln’s attention, and he was appointed a brigadier general, becoming the only Russian born general to serve in the Union Army. He died in 1901 and was laid to rest here, among the soldiers he once led, and some that he fought against.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Built on ancient Native American mounds near the meeting point of where the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers clash, the town sits at a natural crossroads. During the Civil War, that geography turned it into a vital Union stronghold. Mound City became home to one of the largest military hospitals in the West and served as a major naval station. Soldiers from both sides passed through some to recover, many not. It may be quiet now, but this place once pulsed with the urgency of life and death and sat at the crossroad of a nation at war with itself. That history lingers most clearly at the Mound City National Cemetery, just beyond the edge of town. I wasn’t expecting to find it, and I certainly wasn’t expecting the names etched into some of the stones. Two men in particular stood out, John Basil Turchin and Alexander Bielaski. Both born in the Russian Empire. Both connected to Abraham Lincoln. Both now buried here, far from where they began. John Basil Turchin (born Ivan Turchaninov) had once been a colonel in the Russian Imperial Army. He fought in the Crimean War before immigrating to the United States in 1856. When the Civil War broke out, he offered his experience to the Union cause with fierce conviction. His military background and abolitionist ideals caught Lincoln’s attention, and he was appointed a brigadier general, becoming the only Russian born general to serve in the Union Army. He died in 1901 and was laid to rest here, among the soldiers he once led, and some that he fought against.

Jul 30, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Legacy Act gives immunity to British soldiers for acts committed during the Troubles.
Partially True

Fact Check: The Legacy Act gives immunity to British soldiers for acts committed during the Troubles.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Legacy Act gives immunity to British soldiers for acts committed during the Troubles.

Jul 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: An Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) liaison officer ordered snipers to shoot Palestinian children during a humanitarian aid operation.
False

Fact Check: An Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) liaison officer ordered snipers to shoot Palestinian children during a humanitarian aid operation.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: An Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) liaison officer ordered snipers to shoot Palestinian children during a humanitarian aid operation.

Aug 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  Baby monkeys that were given vaccines according vaccination schedule had abnormalities in the region of the brain affecting social and emotional development results during the previous 3-4 months may have had impact brain growth and development... warrant additional into the potential impact between MMR vaccines brain structure Hewitson Lopresti BJ. study. Influence ligand Exp pediatric vaccines study 147-64. structural according the recommended functional changes childhood obtained from male infant rhesus macaques regimen. additional macaques, control group, 6months control animals. vaccinated and behavior) compared Hib-vaccinated primates had significantly altered and emotional primates. primates increase total finding for many children and months
False

Fact Check: Baby monkeys that were given vaccines according vaccination schedule had abnormalities in the region of the brain affecting social and emotional development results during the previous 3-4 months may have had impact brain growth and development... warrant additional into the potential impact between MMR vaccines brain structure Hewitson Lopresti BJ. study. Influence ligand Exp pediatric vaccines study 147-64. structural according the recommended functional changes childhood obtained from male infant rhesus macaques regimen. additional macaques, control group, 6months control animals. vaccinated and behavior) compared Hib-vaccinated primates had significantly altered and emotional primates. primates increase total finding for many children and months

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Baby monkeys that were given vaccines according vaccination schedule had abnormalities in the region of the brain affecting social and emotional development results during the previous 3-4 months may have had impact brain growth and development... warrant additional into the potential impact between MMR vaccines brain structure Hewitson Lopresti BJ. study. Influence ligand Exp pediatric vaccines study 147-64. structural according the recommended functional changes childhood obtained from male infant rhesus macaques regimen. additional macaques, control group, 6months control animals. vaccinated and behavior) compared Hib-vaccinated primates had significantly altered and emotional primates. primates increase total finding for many children and months

Jul 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: During the Opium wars, the British joined the war on drugs, on the side of the drugs | TruthOrFake Blog