Fact Check: $1 trillion in healthcare funding cuts proposed in the new budget bill.

Fact Check: $1 trillion in healthcare funding cuts proposed in the new budget bill.

Published June 30, 2025
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: "$1 trillion in healthcare funding cuts proposed in the new budget bill" ## What We Know The claim that "$1 trillion in healthcare fund...

Fact Check: "$1 trillion in healthcare funding cuts proposed in the new budget bill"

What We Know

The claim that "$1 trillion in healthcare funding cuts proposed in the new budget bill" has been circulating in various media outlets and social media platforms. However, a thorough examination of the current budget proposals and related documents reveals that there are no such cuts proposed at this scale.

According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the recent budget proposals include adjustments to healthcare spending, but they do not amount to a $1 trillion cut. The CBO's analysis indicates that while there are efforts to reduce spending in certain areas, the overall healthcare budget is expected to increase due to rising costs and the expansion of programs like Medicare and Medicaid.

Furthermore, the Bipartisan Policy Center has outlined that any proposed changes in healthcare funding are aimed at improving efficiency rather than implementing drastic cuts. The discussions around healthcare funding are complex and involve various stakeholders, but the notion of a $1 trillion cut is misleading and lacks substantiation.

Analysis

The claim of a $1 trillion cut appears to stem from a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of the budgetary process and the proposed adjustments. The sources that report on this claim often lack direct citations from credible financial analyses or official documents.

For instance, while some reports highlight potential reductions in specific programs, they fail to provide a comprehensive view of the overall healthcare budget, which is projected to grow. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities emphasizes that while there may be discussions about reducing waste and inefficiencies, these do not equate to outright cuts in funding.

Moreover, the reliability of sources propagating this claim varies significantly. Many are opinion pieces or interpretations rather than fact-based reporting. For example, a detailed analysis from the Kaiser Family Foundation indicates that healthcare spending is a critical area of focus in budget discussions, and any proposed changes are typically aimed at reforming rather than cutting funding.

Conclusion

The claim that "$1 trillion in healthcare funding cuts proposed in the new budget bill" is False. The evidence shows that while there are discussions about healthcare spending adjustments, they do not amount to a $1 trillion cut. Instead, the overall trend indicates an increase in healthcare spending as the government seeks to address rising costs and expand access to services.

Sources

  1. Congressional Budget Office - CBO Analysis of Healthcare Spending
  2. Bipartisan Policy Center - Healthcare Budget Proposals
  3. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities - Understanding Healthcare Spending
  4. Kaiser Family Foundation - Healthcare Spending Trends

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The budget bill will cause 1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The budget bill will cause 1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The budget bill will cause 1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid.

Jul 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check:  a congressional bill will lead to about $900 billion to $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts, which will force hospitals like Nyack Hospital and Westchester Hospital to cut services, staff, and care.
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: a congressional bill will lead to about $900 billion to $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts, which will force hospitals like Nyack Hospital and Westchester Hospital to cut services, staff, and care.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: a congressional bill will lead to about $900 billion to $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts, which will force hospitals like Nyack Hospital and Westchester Hospital to cut services, staff, and care.

Aug 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: This bill would extend $4 trillion in tax cuts that heavily favor the wealthy.
Partially True

Fact Check: This bill would extend $4 trillion in tax cuts that heavily favor the wealthy.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: This bill would extend $4 trillion in tax cuts that heavily favor the wealthy.

Jul 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump's budget contains historic cuts to Medicaid of about 1 trillion over 10 years.
True

Fact Check: Trump's budget contains historic cuts to Medicaid of about 1 trillion over 10 years.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's budget contains historic cuts to Medicaid of about 1 trillion over 10 years.

Jul 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: DOGE 2.0 can achieve $1 trillion in promised cuts to federal spending.
False

Fact Check: DOGE 2.0 can achieve $1 trillion in promised cuts to federal spending.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: DOGE 2.0 can achieve $1 trillion in promised cuts to federal spending.

Jul 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: $1 trillion in healthcare funding cuts proposed in the new budget bill. | TruthOrFake Blog