Conclusion

In conclusion, the claim that professional wrestling matches allow the "better man" to win is determined to be False. The evidence presented indicates that outcomes in professional wrestling are predominantly predetermined, driven by narrative and promotional considerations rather than actual athletic performance. Key points supporting this verdict include the scripted nature of matches, the influence of storylines on outcomes, and statistical analyses confirming that results are orchestrated by wrestling promotions.

It is important to note that while the athleticism and skill of the wrestlers are real, the assertion that the "better man" wins in a competitive sense does not hold true within the context of professional wrestling. The outcomes are designed to serve entertainment purposes, which can sometimes obscure the reality of the sport's scripted nature.

However, there are limitations in the available evidence. While multiple sources corroborate the scripted nature of wrestling, the complexity of decision-making processes within promotions and the varying interpretations of what constitutes "better" in wrestling can introduce nuances that are not fully captured in this analysis. Additionally, the potential biases of some sources should be considered when evaluating the information.

Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information regarding professional wrestling and to consider the distinction between entertainment and competition in this unique form of performance art.