TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Do the top 1% pay 70% of taxes

Fact Check: Do the top 1% pay 70% of taxes

Published April 11, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
False

# Do the Top 1% Pay 70% of Taxes? ## Introduction The claim that the top 1% of earners pay 70% of taxes is a provocative assertion that raises questi...

Do the Top 1% Pay 70% of Taxes?

Introduction

The claim that the top 1% of earners pay 70% of taxes is a provocative assertion that raises questions about income distribution and tax policy in the United States. This claim suggests a significant concentration of tax responsibility among the wealthiest individuals, which merits a thorough examination of the available data and interpretations surrounding this topic.

What We Know

  1. Tax Contributions by the Top 1%: According to the Tax Foundation, the top 1% of earners paid approximately 42.3% of federal income taxes in 2020, a figure that has fluctuated in recent years but has not approached 70% 7. In contrast, a report from USAFacts indicates that the top 5% of earners contributed about 66% of the total federal income tax revenue in 2021 4.

  2. Income Tax Statistics: The IRS provides data that indicates the top 1% of income earners had a share of adjusted gross income (AGI) that rose from 20.1% in 2019 to 22.2% in 2020, with their share of federal income taxes paid also increasing during that period 7. However, this still falls short of the 70% claim.

  3. Comparative Tax Burden: The National Taxpayers Union reported that the top 1% paid nearly 46% of all income taxes in 2021, which is significant but again does not support the 70% figure 9.

  4. State-Level Data: A study by SmartAsset indicated that the top 1% of earners contribute about 45% of total personal income taxes nationwide, which includes state and local taxes 5. This broader perspective on tax contributions might suggest a higher overall burden when considering different tax types.

  5. Tax Brackets and Rates: The IRS outlines that the federal income tax system is progressive, meaning that higher income brackets are taxed at higher rates, which contributes to the substantial share of taxes paid by the wealthiest individuals 1.

Analysis

The claim that the top 1% pay 70% of taxes appears to be an exaggeration based on the available data. While it is true that the top 1% bear a significant portion of the tax burden, the figures from reputable sources consistently indicate that their contributions are in the range of 40% to 46% of federal income taxes, not 70%.

Source Reliability

  • IRS Data: The IRS is a primary source for tax statistics and is generally considered reliable. However, its data can be complex and requires careful interpretation 13.
  • Tax Foundation: This organization is known for its analysis of tax policy and provides detailed reports on tax contributions by income groups. While it is a respected source, it may have a conservative bias, which could influence its interpretations 67.
  • USAFacts: This non-profit organization aims to provide factual information about government data, making it a reliable source for understanding tax contributions 4.
  • National Taxpayers Union: This organization advocates for lower taxes and limited government, which may introduce a bias in its reporting 9.
  • SmartAsset: This financial technology company provides data-driven insights but may also have an agenda related to promoting financial literacy and investment 5.

Methodological Concerns

The methodologies used in various studies can differ significantly. For example, some reports focus solely on federal income taxes, while others include state and local taxes, which can skew perceptions of the overall tax burden. The lack of clarity on what constitutes "taxes" in the claim is a critical factor that needs to be addressed.

Conclusion

Verdict: False

The assertion that the top 1% of earners pay 70% of taxes is not supported by the available evidence. Data from reputable sources indicates that the top 1% contribute approximately 42% to 46% of federal income taxes, which is significantly lower than the claimed figure. This discrepancy highlights the importance of critically evaluating claims about tax contributions, as they can often be exaggerated or misinterpreted.

It is essential to consider the context of tax contributions, including the distinction between federal income taxes and other forms of taxation, such as state and local taxes. While the top 1% do bear a substantial tax burden, the claim in question lacks accuracy and should be approached with skepticism.

Limitations in the available evidence include potential biases in the sources and the varying methodologies used to calculate tax contributions. As such, readers are encouraged to engage with this topic thoughtfully and to seek out diverse perspectives and data to form a well-rounded understanding of tax policy and income distribution.

Sources

  1. Internal Revenue Service. "Federal income tax rates and brackets." https://www.irs.gov/filing/federal-income-tax-rates-and-brackets
  2. GOV.UK. "Summary Statistics." https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/income-tax-liabilities-statistics-tax-year-2020-to-2021-to-tax-year-2023-to-2024/summary-statistics
  3. Internal Revenue Service. "SOI tax stats - Individual statistical tables by size of adjusted gross income." https://www.irs.gov/statistics/soi-tax-stats-individual-statistical-tables-by-size-of-adjusted-gross-income
  4. USAFacts. "Who pays the most income tax?" https://usafacts.org/articles/who-pays-the-most-income-tax/
  5. SmartAsset. "What the Top 1% Pay in Taxes in Each State – 2024 Study." https://smartasset.com/data-studies/taxes-top-1-percent-2024
  6. Tax Foundation. "Summary of the Latest Federal Income Tax Data, 2025 Update." https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/federal/latest-federal-income-tax-data-2025/
  7. Tax Foundation. "Summary of the Latest Federal Income Tax Data, 2023 Update." https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/federal/summary-latest-federal-income-tax-data-2023-update/
  8. Tax Foundation. "Who Pays Federal Income Taxes? Latest Federal Income Tax Data." https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/federal/latest-federal-income-tax-data-2024/
  9. National Taxpayers Union. "Who Pays Income Taxes?" https://www.ntu.org/foundation/tax-page/who-pays-income-taxes
  10. GOBankingRates. "How Much the Top 1% Pay in Taxes in Every State." https://www.gobankingrates.com/taxes/tax-laws/how-much-the-top-1-pay-in-taxes-in-every-state/

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: top doctors said we were tod to delibratetl kill millions of covide patients using ventilators
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: top doctors said we were tod to delibratetl kill millions of covide patients using ventilators

Detailed fact-check analysis of: top doctors said we were tod to delibratetl kill millions of covide patients using ventilators

Aug 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: BP Gas is top tier
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: BP Gas is top tier

Detailed fact-check analysis of: BP Gas is top tier

Aug 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Admins please turn on advance privacy in this group. Whatsapp group chat is under AI cybersecurity challenges, each whatsapp group admin please switch on Advance Chat Privacy , otherwise all AI will legally access into all group chat members messages and personal HP n to everyone phone. Even 1 to 1 whatsapp chat also need to switch on Advance Chat Privacy too▶️ Open a group chat ▶️ Click on the three dots at the top right of the group page. ▶️ Click on group info ▶️ Scroll down on the group info page and click on ‘Advanced Chat Privacy’ Turn it on.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Admins please turn on advance privacy in this group. Whatsapp group chat is under AI cybersecurity challenges, each whatsapp group admin please switch on Advance Chat Privacy , otherwise all AI will legally access into all group chat members messages and personal HP n to everyone phone. Even 1 to 1 whatsapp chat also need to switch on Advance Chat Privacy too▶️ Open a group chat ▶️ Click on the three dots at the top right of the group page. ▶️ Click on group info ▶️ Scroll down on the group info page and click on ‘Advanced Chat Privacy’ Turn it on.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Admins please turn on advance privacy in this group. Whatsapp group chat is under AI cybersecurity challenges, each whatsapp group admin please switch on Advance Chat Privacy , otherwise all AI will legally access into all group chat members messages and personal HP n to everyone phone. Even 1 to 1 whatsapp chat also need to switch on Advance Chat Privacy too▶️ Open a group chat ▶️ Click on the three dots at the top right of the group page. ▶️ Click on group info ▶️ Scroll down on the group info page and click on ‘Advanced Chat Privacy’ Turn it on.

Aug 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Not trying to freak anybody out. I wasn't going to talk about this for a while but is anyone else like looking into the fact that there's 76 volcanoes that are currently erupting. Our polls have moved astronomic. Like they're they're moving faster than they ever have in history. And on top of that we've got the earthquakes everywhere and the fires. We've got earthquakes that are happening at Yellowstone National Park and Santorini which are two of the most massive volcanoes. Like we have the the gases that are 00:31 coming from these different volcanic eruptions that are spreading all over the planet and then on top of that we've also got the solar flares that are hitting the magnetic field of our planet which if it weakens enough can actually cause the the poles to flip. And that's concerning because if you've looked into what happens if that I mean we don't know for sure. It's theoretical. For entertainment purposes only always and forever. Of course. But at Theoretically it wouldn't be good. Who knows? There could be 01:07 like some saving grace. Maybe it won't happen. Maybe it'll just all calm down. But it goes along also with the hopey prophecy. Of the the two brothers or twins flipping and then the weakening and then the the floods and all that that jazz that seems to be And then we've got the airplanes on top of that which could either be maybe from the magnetic field or the solar flares or from the poles shifting. I have no idea. But there's a lot of pl
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 Not trying to freak anybody out. I wasn't going to talk about this for a while but is anyone else like looking into the fact that there's 76 volcanoes that are currently erupting. Our polls have moved astronomic. Like they're they're moving faster than they ever have in history. And on top of that we've got the earthquakes everywhere and the fires. We've got earthquakes that are happening at Yellowstone National Park and Santorini which are two of the most massive volcanoes. Like we have the the gases that are 00:31 coming from these different volcanic eruptions that are spreading all over the planet and then on top of that we've also got the solar flares that are hitting the magnetic field of our planet which if it weakens enough can actually cause the the poles to flip. And that's concerning because if you've looked into what happens if that I mean we don't know for sure. It's theoretical. For entertainment purposes only always and forever. Of course. But at Theoretically it wouldn't be good. Who knows? There could be 01:07 like some saving grace. Maybe it won't happen. Maybe it'll just all calm down. But it goes along also with the hopey prophecy. Of the the two brothers or twins flipping and then the weakening and then the the floods and all that that jazz that seems to be And then we've got the airplanes on top of that which could either be maybe from the magnetic field or the solar flares or from the poles shifting. I have no idea. But there's a lot of pl

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 Not trying to freak anybody out. I wasn't going to talk about this for a while but is anyone else like looking into the fact that there's 76 volcanoes that are currently erupting. Our polls have moved astronomic. Like they're they're moving faster than they ever have in history. And on top of that we've got the earthquakes everywhere and the fires. We've got earthquakes that are happening at Yellowstone National Park and Santorini which are two of the most massive volcanoes. Like we have the the gases that are 00:31 coming from these different volcanic eruptions that are spreading all over the planet and then on top of that we've also got the solar flares that are hitting the magnetic field of our planet which if it weakens enough can actually cause the the poles to flip. And that's concerning because if you've looked into what happens if that I mean we don't know for sure. It's theoretical. For entertainment purposes only always and forever. Of course. But at Theoretically it wouldn't be good. Who knows? There could be 01:07 like some saving grace. Maybe it won't happen. Maybe it'll just all calm down. But it goes along also with the hopey prophecy. Of the the two brothers or twins flipping and then the weakening and then the the floods and all that that jazz that seems to be And then we've got the airplanes on top of that which could either be maybe from the magnetic field or the solar flares or from the poles shifting. I have no idea. But there's a lot of pl

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Circle k gas is top tier
Partially True

Fact Check: Circle k gas is top tier

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Circle k gas is top tier

Aug 15, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Do the top 1% pay 70% of taxes | TruthOrFake Blog