TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Distrubing videos

Fact Check: Distrubing videos

Published June 28, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "Disturbing Videos" ## What We Know The claim regarding "disturbing videos" appears to be vague and lacks specific context. Discord, a ...

Fact Check: "Disturbing Videos"

What We Know

The claim regarding "disturbing videos" appears to be vague and lacks specific context. Discord, a popular VoIP messaging application, is often utilized for gaming and community building. It allows users to create servers and channels for various purposes, including text, voice, and video communication (source-1, source-2). The platform has gained significant popularity since its launch in 2015, particularly among gamers, due to its low-latency communication and customizable features (source-2).

While Discord is generally considered safe and user-friendly, it has faced criticism and scrutiny regarding the content shared on its platform. Users can share videos, images, and links, which can sometimes include inappropriate or disturbing content. However, the platform has implemented various moderation tools and community guidelines to mitigate such issues (source-3).

Analysis

The claim about "disturbing videos" lacks specificity, making it difficult to assess its validity. While it is true that users can share various types of content on Discord, including videos, the platform itself does not promote or condone disturbing content. The nature of the videos shared depends largely on the individual users and the specific servers or channels they participate in.

Furthermore, Discord has a system in place for reporting inappropriate content, and community moderators often play a crucial role in maintaining the platform's standards (source-4). The effectiveness of these measures can vary, and some users may still encounter disturbing content despite the guidelines.

The sources consulted provide a general overview of Discord's functionalities and community standards, but they do not specifically address the prevalence or nature of disturbing videos on the platform. This lack of direct evidence makes it challenging to draw a definitive conclusion about the claim.

Conclusion

Needs Research. The claim regarding "disturbing videos" on Discord is too vague and lacks context. While there are concerns about inappropriate content on the platform, the extent and nature of such content are not well-documented in the available sources. Further investigation is needed to understand the specific instances and contexts in which disturbing videos may be encountered on Discord.

Sources

  1. Discord — скачайте и установите в Windows | Microsoft Store
  2. Discord APP | Что такое Дискорд и как пользоваться программой
  3. Discord Apps and Activities
  4. Discord - Talk, Play, Hang Out - Apps on Google Play

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Grok inaccurately linked videos to attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Grok inaccurately linked videos to attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Grok inaccurately linked videos to attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities.

Jun 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Malian soldiers filmed cooking human body parts in shocking videos.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Malian soldiers filmed cooking human body parts in shocking videos.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Malian soldiers filmed cooking human body parts in shocking videos.

Jun 24, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Nick Fuentes' videos have amassed over 30 million views promoting white supremacy.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Nick Fuentes' videos have amassed over 30 million views promoting white supremacy.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Nick Fuentes' videos have amassed over 30 million views promoting white supremacy.

Jun 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Is adolf hitler better than mrbeast coz he dosent eat meat (use that vegan theacher videos)
False

Fact Check: Is adolf hitler better than mrbeast coz he dosent eat meat (use that vegan theacher videos)

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Is adolf hitler better than mrbeast coz he dosent eat meat (use that vegan theacher videos)

Aug 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: AI technology has made it easier to create convincing fake images and videos.
True

Fact Check: AI technology has made it easier to create convincing fake images and videos.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: AI technology has made it easier to create convincing fake images and videos.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks
Fact Check: Distrubing videos | TruthOrFake Blog