Fact Check: District Judge Denise Casper ruled that Trump's attempts to require proof of citizenship on a federal registration form and to prevent states from counting mail ballots received after Election Day would unduly burden states.

Fact Check: "District Judge Denise Casper ruled that Trump's attempts to require proof of citizenship on a federal registration form and to prevent states from counting mail ballots received after Election Day would unduly burden states."

What We Know

On June 13, 2025, District Judge Denise Casper ruled against an executive order issued by President Trump that aimed to implement stringent voting requirements, including proof of citizenship for federal voter registration and restrictions on counting mail ballots received after Election Day. Judge Casper's ruling highlighted that these measures would impose significant burdens on states, requiring extensive efforts and costs to revamp their voter registration procedures (source-1, source-2).

The judge's decision was based on concerns that the executive order would likely disenfranchise voters, particularly among marginalized communities. She noted that the requirements could disproportionately affect Black and low-income Americans, who may lack the necessary documentation to prove citizenship (source-3, source-4).

Analysis

The ruling by Judge Casper is well-documented and supported by a variety of sources, including legal opinions and media reports. The judge articulated that the executive order would not only impose significant administrative burdens on states but also risk disenfranchising eligible voters. She emphasized that the Constitution does not grant the president authority over election processes, which is a critical point in her legal reasoning (source-5, source-6).

The sources reporting on this ruling, including major news outlets like CNN, The New York Times, and PBS, are generally considered reliable and reputable. They provide comprehensive coverage of the ruling and its implications, citing the judge's concerns about voter disenfranchisement and the administrative burdens on states (source-7, source-8).

Critically, the ruling reflects a broader legal consensus that executive overreach in election administration is problematic and that such measures can have far-reaching consequences for voter participation.

Conclusion

The claim that District Judge Denise Casper ruled against Trump's attempts to require proof of citizenship and to restrict mail ballot counting due to the undue burden on states is True. The evidence from multiple credible sources confirms that the judge's ruling was based on substantial legal reasoning regarding the potential disenfranchisement of voters and the excessive burdens placed on state election processes.

Sources

1. united states district court
2. Judge Blocks Trump Voting Order Requiring Proof of ...
3. Federal judge blocks Trump executive order that requires ...
4. Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Anti-Voting Decree, Says it ...
5. Federal judge blocks Trump's election overhaul that had ...
6. Judge blocks Trump's proof of citizenship election ...
7. Second federal judge sides against Trump's election ...
8. Federal court blocks Trump voter registration citizenship ...