Fact Check: Did Lyndsey graham say he’s open to Trump being pope

Fact Check: Did Lyndsey graham say he’s open to Trump being pope

Published April 30, 2025
VERDICT
Mostly True

# Did Lindsey Graham Say He’s Open to Trump Being Pope? In recent news, a claim has emerged that U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham jokingly expressed suppo...

Did Lindsey Graham Say He’s Open to Trump Being Pope?

In recent news, a claim has emerged that U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham jokingly expressed support for Donald Trump to become the next pope. This statement reportedly followed a light-hearted comment made by Trump himself, who stated that he would like to be pope. Graham's remarks have sparked a flurry of reactions online, leading to questions about the context and implications of his statements.

What We Know

  1. Trump's Comment: During an event, Donald Trump stated, "I'd like to be pope. That would be my No. 1 choice," which was made in a joking manner as he was departing for a rally 135.

  2. Graham's Response: Following Trump's comment, Lindsey Graham responded by asking the papal conclave and the Catholic faithful to "keep an open mind" about Trump potentially becoming pope. He characterized Trump as a "dark horse candidate" for the position 24610.

  3. Social Media Reaction: Graham took to social media to express his excitement about Trump's openness to the idea, which has been interpreted as a humorous endorsement rather than a serious political statement 69.

  4. Context of the Remarks: These comments come in the wake of the passing of Pope Francis, which has led to discussions about potential successors within the Catholic Church 710.

Analysis

Source Evaluation

  1. Fox News: The article from Fox News presents Graham's comments in a straightforward manner, but as a media outlet known for its conservative bias, it may frame the story in a way that appeals to its audience 1.

  2. Newsmax: This source also reports on Graham's comments, emphasizing the humorous aspect. Newsmax is generally considered to have a right-leaning bias, which may influence how the story is presented 2.

  3. Newsweek: This publication provides a more neutral tone and includes additional context about the political implications of Graham's remarks. Newsweek is generally regarded as a credible source, although it has faced criticism for sensationalism in some articles 3.

  4. TIME: The report from TIME offers a balanced view, acknowledging the humor in Graham's comments while also discussing the broader implications of a Trump papacy. TIME is considered a reputable source with a history of journalistic integrity 4.

  5. The Hill: This source focuses on the political ramifications of Graham's comments and provides a succinct summary of the events. The Hill is generally viewed as reliable, though it may have a slight liberal bias 5.

  6. Social Media: Graham's posts on X (formerly Twitter) are primary sources of his statements, but they lack the context that traditional news outlets provide. Social media can often amplify humor or sarcasm that may not translate well in written form 6.

Methodology and Evidence

The claims surrounding Graham's comments are based on direct quotes and social media posts. However, the context in which these statements were made is crucial. They appear to be humorous and not intended as serious political endorsements. The lack of serious discourse surrounding the idea of Trump as pope suggests that these comments are more about political banter than genuine advocacy.

Conflicts of Interest

While the sources reporting on Graham's comments are generally credible, they may have biases that affect their portrayal of the events. For instance, outlets like Fox News and Newsmax may present Graham's remarks in a way that aligns with their audience's political views. Additionally, Graham himself has a long-standing political relationship with Trump, which could influence his comments and how they are interpreted.

Conclusion

Verdict: Mostly True

The claim that Lindsey Graham expressed openness to Donald Trump becoming pope is mostly true, as it is based on Graham's actual comments following Trump's light-hearted statement about wanting to be pope. Graham's remarks were made in a joking context, suggesting a humorous endorsement rather than a serious political position.

However, the interpretation of these comments can vary significantly based on the audience and the media outlet reporting them. While some sources emphasize the humor, others may frame the comments in a more serious light, reflecting their political biases.

It is important to acknowledge that the context of these statements—made in a light-hearted manner—limits their seriousness. The lack of substantial discourse regarding Trump as a viable candidate for the papacy further indicates that these comments are not meant to be taken literally.

Readers should be aware of the limitations in the available evidence and the potential biases of the sources reporting on this topic. As always, it is advisable to critically evaluate information and consider multiple perspectives before drawing conclusions.

Sources

  1. Fox News. "Sen. Lindsey Graham jokingly calls for 'open mind' about Trump as pope." Link
  2. Newsmax. "Lindsey Graham Jokes: Trump MMXXVIII for Pope." Link
  3. Newsweek. "Lindsey Graham Backs Trump to Be the Next Pope: 'Trump MMXXVIII!'" Link
  4. TIME. "Who Trump Wants to Be the Next Pope." Link
  5. The Hill. "Graham jokingly asks conclave, Catholics to ‘keep an open mind’ about Pope Trump." Link
  6. Lindsey Graham - X. Link
  7. NewsLooks. "Lindsey Graham Jokes Trump Should Be Next Pope." Link
  8. The Daily Beast. "Pope Donald? Meghan McCain Calls Out Boot-Licking Lindsey Graham." Link
  9. HuffPost. "Lindsey Graham Ripped After 'Groveling' New Trump Message." Link
  10. Charleston City Paper. "Trump for pope, Graham jokes." Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Aug 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: did Trump plead the 5th 97 times
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: did Trump plead the 5th 97 times

Detailed fact-check analysis of: did Trump plead the 5th 97 times

Aug 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Did Trump end 6 wars?
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Did Trump end 6 wars?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Did Trump end 6 wars?

Aug 19, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Did Trump and Putin make a deal on a ceasefire in Ukraine?
False

Fact Check: Did Trump and Putin make a deal on a ceasefire in Ukraine?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Did Trump and Putin make a deal on a ceasefire in Ukraine?

Aug 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Did American veterans get arrested in DC legally protesting Trump  taking over dc
Unverified

Fact Check: Did American veterans get arrested in DC legally protesting Trump taking over dc

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Did American veterans get arrested in DC legally protesting Trump taking over dc

Aug 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Did American veterans get arrested in DC well legally protesting Trump
True

Fact Check: Did American veterans get arrested in DC well legally protesting Trump

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Did American veterans get arrested in DC well legally protesting Trump

Aug 14, 2025
Read more →