Fact Check: Democrats City's have more crime then Republicans City's

Fact Check: Democrats City's have more crime then Republicans City's

Published March 23, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# The Claim: "Democratic Cities Have More Crime Than Republican Cities" ## Introduction The assertion that cities governed by Democrats experience hi...

The Claim: "Democratic Cities Have More Crime Than Republican Cities"

Introduction

The assertion that cities governed by Democrats experience higher crime rates than those led by Republicans has gained traction in political discourse. This claim often surfaces in discussions about urban governance and public safety, suggesting a correlation between political leadership and crime statistics. However, the complexity of crime data and the socio-political factors at play necessitate a thorough examination of the evidence supporting this claim.

What We Know

  1. Crime Rates and Political Leadership: A report indicates that as of June 2022, 27 of the top 30 cities with the highest murder rates were led by Democratic mayors, with only a few exceptions like Jacksonville, Florida, and Lexington, Kentucky, which are run by Republicans 1.

  2. Migration Patterns: A study from the University at Buffalo suggests that rising crime rates in Democratic-controlled cities have contributed to a trend of Americans relocating to Republican states, implying a perception that crime is more prevalent in blue cities 2.

  3. Research Findings: A Harvard Gazette article notes that research shows mayors from both parties have implemented mixed policies regarding crime, suggesting that the issue is not strictly partisan 3.

  4. Contextual Factors: The New York Times highlights that urban areas, which are often governed by Democrats, typically have higher crime rates due to factors like population density and socio-economic conditions. This complicates the narrative that crime is solely a result of political leadership 4.

  5. National Crime Trends: According to a BBC fact-check, the increase in murder rates observed during the COVID-19 pandemic affected both Democratic and Republican-run cities similarly, indicating that crime rates are not exclusively tied to political affiliation 5.

  6. Political Implications: NPR reported that rising violent crime in urban areas has become a significant political issue for Democrats, suggesting that crime trends can influence electoral outcomes 6.

  7. Comparative Analysis: A blog on Planetizen discusses the political narratives surrounding crime in red and blue cities, noting that while crime rates have fluctuated, they are often politicized in ways that may not accurately reflect underlying realities 7.

  8. Counterexamples: An article from Newsweek points out that several Republican-led cities have crime rates that exceed those of major Democratic cities, challenging the notion that Democratic governance is the sole factor in high crime rates 8.

  9. Methodological Concerns: The Manhattan Institute discusses the limitations of empirical studies comparing crime rates across political lines, suggesting that such analyses often overlook critical contextual factors 9.

  10. Public Perception: A Tampa Bay Times article reveals that perceptions of safety in major cities vary significantly between Democrats and Republicans, indicating that political affiliation may influence how crime is viewed rather than the actual crime statistics themselves 10.

Analysis

The claim that Democratic cities have more crime than Republican cities is supported by some data, particularly regarding murder rates in specific urban areas. However, the sources cited present a mixed picture that complicates a straightforward interpretation of these statistics.

  • Source Reliability: The report from the House 1 is a government document, which generally lends it credibility, but it may have an agenda in framing the data to support a political narrative. The University at Buffalo study 2 is academic, which typically adds reliability, yet it may also reflect the biases of its authors. The Harvard Gazette 3 and New York Times 4 provide journalistic perspectives that are generally reputable but may also be influenced by editorial slants.

  • Conflicting Evidence: The BBC 5 and Newsweek 8 provide counterpoints that highlight the complexity of crime data, suggesting that political leadership alone does not account for crime rates. This indicates that while there may be correlations, causation is not established.

  • Methodological Limitations: The Manhattan Institute 9 raises important concerns about the methodologies used in studies comparing crime rates across political lines, suggesting that more nuanced approaches are needed to understand the relationship between governance and crime.

  • Public Perception vs. Reality: The divergence in perceptions of safety between political groups, as noted by the Tampa Bay Times 10, underscores the role of political identity in shaping views on crime, which may not align with statistical realities.

Conclusion

Verdict: Partially True

The claim that Democratic cities have more crime than Republican cities is partially true, as some data indicates higher murder rates in cities led by Democratic mayors. However, the evidence is nuanced and does not support a straightforward conclusion that political leadership is the sole determinant of crime rates. Factors such as population density, socio-economic conditions, and public perception play significant roles in shaping crime statistics.

While certain reports highlight a correlation between Democratic governance and higher crime rates, other sources indicate that crime trends are influenced by a multitude of factors, including national trends and local conditions. Additionally, some Republican-led cities report crime rates that exceed those of Democratic cities, further complicating the narrative.

It is important to acknowledge the limitations of the available evidence, as many studies may not fully account for the complex socio-political landscape influencing crime. As such, readers should approach this topic with a critical mindset and consider the broader context when evaluating claims about crime and political leadership.

Sources

  1. House of Representatives. "PDF 27 of Top 30 Crime-Ridden Cities Run by Democrats." Link
  2. University at Buffalo. "Crime is Making Americans Flee Democratic States." Link
  3. Harvard Gazette. "Who’s softer on crime? Democrats or Republicans?" Link
  4. The New York Times. "Crime Is Nonpartisan." Link
  5. BBC News. "US elections 2020: Fact-checking Trump on crime in Democratic-run cities." Link
  6. NPR. "Rising Violent Crime Is Likely To Present A Political Challenge For Democrats In 2022." Link
  7. Planetizen. "Red Cities, Blue Cities, and Crime." Link
  8. Newsweek. "Republican Cities That Have Higher Crime Rates Than New York." Link
  9. Manhattan Institute. "The “Red” vs. “Blue” Crime Debate and the Limits of Empirical Social Science." Link
  10. Tampa Bay Times. "Americans are confused about big-city crime, and perceptions differ by party." Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Republicans lie more than democrats
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Republicans lie more than democrats

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Republicans lie more than democrats

Jul 19, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Are republicans or democrats more college educated
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Are republicans or democrats more college educated

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Are republicans or democrats more college educated

Jul 19, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: In 1860, there were fewer than 10 Republicans in the United States who owned slaves, and the vast majority of the approximately four million slaves were owned by Democrats.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: In 1860, there were fewer than 10 Republicans in the United States who owned slaves, and the vast majority of the approximately four million slaves were owned by Democrats.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: In 1860, there were fewer than 10 Republicans in the United States who owned slaves, and the vast majority of the approximately four million slaves were owned by Democrats.

Aug 17, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript
00:00
I cannot believe that Trump is
cutting Medicaid. Actually,
what I meant to say is that I
can't believe he's not cutting
more of it because medicaid is
a money laundering scheme for
your government.
Congratulations all you
bleeding heart democrats.
Instead of raging against the
machine, you're bending over
for it. Medicaid is jointly run
by the states and the feds and
for every one dollar that your
state allocates to the program,
the Feds turn around and match
that at a level of one 00
percent so one dollar up to
nine dollars. And this money
comes from taxpayers in other
00:34
states. Your money has a 900%
return rate at someone else's
expense. Why wouldn't you
expand the program? Thanks
Obama. That's exactly how we
wound up with way too many
Medicaid recipients in the
first place. Like everything
related to healthcare the
providers are in bed with the
government on this one too
because the government can tax
the providers. 1. Use that
dollar to collect the up to
nine dollars in federal funds
and to reimburse the provider
their original dollar. What?
Robbing the taxpayer to pad the
funding pool leading to
increase reimbursements for
01:06
Medicaid for the providers.
Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a
health care facility, I'm
saying sign me up to that. Yes,
the medical industrial complex
totally has your best interest
in mind so go ahead and swallow
up those vaccines like a good
little comrade. Age me harder
daddy. And speaking of
comrades, do you know how many
people in this country receive
Medicaid that shouldn't? Before
you start screaming, everyone
should get free health care.
Not the argument here. We do
not have universal health care
in the United States. It
doesn't work and since we don't
have it, that means someone is
paying for it and guess what?
There are lower-income families
01:37
who don't qualify for the
benefits but they're taxpayers
and they're being burdened by
this. Back to the point which
is that the system is insanely
abused. I used to do child
support referee work for years
and you would v
Partially True

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 I cannot believe that Trump is cutting Medicaid. Actually, what I meant to say is that I can't believe he's not cutting more of it because medicaid is a money laundering scheme for your government. Congratulations all you bleeding heart democrats. Instead of raging against the machine, you're bending over for it. Medicaid is jointly run by the states and the feds and for every one dollar that your state allocates to the program, the Feds turn around and match that at a level of one 00 percent so one dollar up to nine dollars. And this money comes from taxpayers in other 00:34 states. Your money has a 900% return rate at someone else's expense. Why wouldn't you expand the program? Thanks Obama. That's exactly how we wound up with way too many Medicaid recipients in the first place. Like everything related to healthcare the providers are in bed with the government on this one too because the government can tax the providers. 1. Use that dollar to collect the up to nine dollars in federal funds and to reimburse the provider their original dollar. What? Robbing the taxpayer to pad the funding pool leading to increase reimbursements for 01:06 Medicaid for the providers. Yeah, if I'm a doctor or a health care facility, I'm saying sign me up to that. Yes, the medical industrial complex totally has your best interest in mind so go ahead and swallow up those vaccines like a good little comrade. Age me harder daddy. And speaking of comrades, do you know how many people in this country receive Medicaid that shouldn't? Before you start screaming, everyone should get free health care. Not the argument here. We do not have universal health care in the United States. It doesn't work and since we don't have it, that means someone is paying for it and guess what? There are lower-income families 01:37 who don't qualify for the benefits but they're taxpayers and they're being burdened by this. Back to the point which is that the system is insanely abused. I used to do child support referee work for years and you would v

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Democrats are better for america than Republicans at national debt
Partially True

Fact Check: Democrats are better for america than Republicans at national debt

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Democrats are better for america than Republicans at national debt

Jul 21, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Since WWII:

Jobs under Democrats: 50 million
Jobs under Republicans: 1 million
Real GDP Growth Rate Dems: 4.3%
Real GDP Growth Rate Repubs: 2.5%
Unemployment Rates: Lower under Democrats
Inflation Rates: Lower under Democrats
Budget Deficits: Lower under Democrats
Stock Market Returns: Higher under Democrats
Recessions under Republicans: 84%
Recessions under Democrats: 16%
Unverified

Fact Check: Since WWII: Jobs under Democrats: 50 million Jobs under Republicans: 1 million Real GDP Growth Rate Dems: 4.3% Real GDP Growth Rate Repubs: 2.5% Unemployment Rates: Lower under Democrats Inflation Rates: Lower under Democrats Budget Deficits: Lower under Democrats Stock Market Returns: Higher under Democrats Recessions under Republicans: 84% Recessions under Democrats: 16%

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Since WWII: Jobs under Democrats: 50 million Jobs under Republicans: 1 million Real GDP Growth Rate Dems: 4.3% Real GDP Growth Rate Repubs: 2.5% Unemployment Rates: Lower under Democrats Inflation Rates: Lower under Democrats Budget Deficits: Lower under Democrats Stock Market Returns: Higher under Democrats Recessions under Republicans: 84% Recessions under Democrats: 16%

Aug 4, 2025
Read more →