Fact Check: Cuts to the National Weather Service contributed to the Texas flood death toll.

Fact Check: Cuts to the National Weather Service contributed to the Texas flood death toll.

Published July 9, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: Cuts to the National Weather Service Contributed to the Texas Flood Death Toll ## What We Know The claim that cuts to the National Weat...

Fact Check: Cuts to the National Weather Service Contributed to the Texas Flood Death Toll

What We Know

The claim that cuts to the National Weather Service (NWS) contributed to the Texas flood death toll arises from significant staffing reductions during the Trump administration. Reports indicate that the NWS lost hundreds of employees through firings and separation incentives, which some lawmakers argue could have impacted the agency's ability to effectively forecast and respond to severe weather events (Schumer requests probe into impact of staffing cuts on ...).

In the wake of catastrophic flooding that resulted in nearly 90 confirmed deaths in Kerr County, Texas, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called for an investigation into whether these staffing shortages affected the NWS's forecasting accuracy and coordination with local emergency officials (NWS defends its Texas flood warnings amid fresh scrutiny ...). The NWS did issue warnings prior to the flooding, but some officials criticized the accuracy of those forecasts, suggesting they underestimated the rainfall (NWS defends its Texas flood warnings amid fresh scrutiny ...).

Despite these concerns, the NWS and independent meteorologists defended the quality of the warnings issued, stating that the forecasts were timely and accurate given the data available at the time. They emphasized that the challenge lies in ensuring that urgent warnings reach those at risk (NWS defends its Texas flood warnings amid fresh scrutiny ...).

Former FEMA Director Deanne Criswell highlighted that staffing cuts could hinder the NWS's ability to assist local jurisdictions effectively, as federal meteorologists play a crucial role in predicting flood impacts (Schumer requests probe into impact of staffing cuts on ...).

Analysis

The evidence surrounding the claim is mixed. On one hand, the staffing cuts at the NWS are documented and have raised concerns among lawmakers and former officials about their potential impact on emergency response capabilities (Schumer requests probe into impact of staffing cuts on ...). The call for an investigation by Schumer indicates a belief that these cuts may have had serious implications for public safety during the floods.

On the other hand, the NWS has maintained that it was adequately staffed to handle the situation and that the warnings issued were appropriate given the circumstances (NWS defends its Texas flood warnings amid fresh scrutiny ...). Meteorologists have pointed out that predicting extreme weather events is inherently difficult, and the challenge often lies in communication rather than staffing levels. They argue that the warnings were timely and that the primary issue may have been the effectiveness of reaching those in danger (NWS defends its Texas flood warnings amid fresh scrutiny ...).

The reliability of sources varies; while government reports and statements from the NWS are authoritative, opinions from independent meteorologists and former officials provide valuable context but may carry some bias based on their affiliations or perspectives on the administration's cuts (NWS defends its Texas flood warnings amid fresh scrutiny ..., Did National Weather Service cuts lead to the Texas flood ...).

Conclusion

The claim that cuts to the National Weather Service contributed to the Texas flood death toll is Partially True. While there is evidence of significant staffing reductions that could potentially impact forecasting and emergency response, the NWS maintained that it was adequately staffed and capable of issuing timely warnings. However, the mixed responses from officials and the call for an investigation suggest that the full impact of these cuts on the tragic outcomes of the flooding remains uncertain.

Sources

  1. Schumer requests probe into impact of staffing cuts on ...
  2. NWS defends its Texas flood warnings amid fresh scrutiny ...
  3. Did National Weather Service cuts lead to the Texas flood ...
  4. Are Donald Trump's NOAA Cuts to Blame for Texas Flood Tragedy ...
  5. Trump's government cuts and the catastrophe in Texas
  6. Cuts to NOAA increase the risk of deadly weather tragedies
  7. Did National Weather Service Cuts Affect the Response to the ...
  8. Deadly floods could be new normal as Trump guts federal ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Staffing cuts at the National Weather Service contributed to the flood disaster.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Staffing cuts at the National Weather Service contributed to the flood disaster.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Staffing cuts at the National Weather Service contributed to the flood disaster.

Jul 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Trump-era cuts to the National Weather Service worsened the Texas floods.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump-era cuts to the National Weather Service worsened the Texas floods.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump-era cuts to the National Weather Service worsened the Texas floods.

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: National Weather Service cuts prevented victims from receiving early warnings during flooding.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: National Weather Service cuts prevented victims from receiving early warnings during flooding.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: National Weather Service cuts prevented victims from receiving early warnings during flooding.

Jul 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Federal cuts to FEMA caused the high death toll in Texas floods.
Partially True

Fact Check: Federal cuts to FEMA caused the high death toll in Texas floods.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Federal cuts to FEMA caused the high death toll in Texas floods.

Jul 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Federal cuts to the National Weather Service did not impact staffing or forecasting abilities.
False

Fact Check: Federal cuts to the National Weather Service did not impact staffing or forecasting abilities.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Federal cuts to the National Weather Service did not impact staffing or forecasting abilities.

Jul 8, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →