Fact Check: Cuomo's campaign spent $22 million but still lost.

Fact Check: Cuomo's campaign spent $22 million but still lost.

Published June 29, 2025
by TruthOrFake AI
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: "Cuomo's campaign spent $22 million but still lost." ## What We Know The claim that Andrew Cuomo's campaign spent $22 million but still...

Fact Check: "Cuomo's campaign spent $22 million but still lost."

What We Know

The claim that Andrew Cuomo's campaign spent $22 million but still lost is rooted in the context of his recent mayoral bid in New York City. Cuomo's campaign was significantly supported by a super PAC named "Fix the City," which raised approximately $25 million to bolster his candidacy against Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani. This super PAC is noted as the largest ever created for a New York City mayoral campaign, aiming to outspend Cuomo's official campaign budget by a substantial margin (New York Times).

Despite this financial backing, Cuomo ultimately lost the Democratic primary to Mamdani, who declared victory shortly after the election (AP News). Reports indicate that the expenditures by the super PAC amounted to around $87 per vote for Cuomo, highlighting the significant financial resources allocated to a losing campaign (The City).

Analysis

The assertion that Cuomo's campaign spent $22 million is somewhat misleading, as it conflates the spending of his official campaign with that of the super PAC supporting him. While Cuomo's campaign itself may have had a budget that contributed to this figure, the bulk of the financial resources came from external sources, particularly the super PAC, which spent aggressively on advertising and other campaign efforts (New York Times).

The reliability of the sources discussing these expenditures is generally high. The New York Times and AP News are reputable news organizations known for their journalistic standards. However, the framing of the spending as solely Cuomo's can lead to misconceptions about the nature of campaign financing and the role of super PACs in modern elections.

Moreover, the context of the election is crucial. Cuomo's loss, despite substantial financial backing, reflects not just the monetary aspect but also voter sentiment and the political landscape, which may have favored Mamdani's platform over Cuomo's (The City).

Conclusion

Needs Research. The claim that "Cuomo's campaign spent $22 million but still lost" requires further investigation to clarify the distinction between the funds raised and spent by his campaign versus those of supporting super PACs. While the financial figures are accurate, the interpretation of these expenditures as solely Cuomo's campaign spending oversimplifies the complexities of campaign finance and does not fully account for the dynamics of the election outcome.

Sources

  1. NITROGLYCERIN tablet - DailyMed
  2. With $25 Million, Pro-Cuomo Super PAC Shatters Outside ...
  3. Cuomo Has $16 Million in Campaign Cash and No Campaign. What Now?
  4. Mamdani declares victory in NYC's Democratic mayoral ...
  5. A Union That Pushed Cuomo to Resign Spends $1 Million ...
  6. Red Cross ALS - Lesson 5 - Acute Coronary Syndromes
  7. Cuomo Backers Dumped $87 Per Vote Into a Losing Cause
  8. Nitroglycerin Dosage Guide + Max Dose, Adjustments

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

Fact Check: Cuomo's campaign spent $22 million but still lost. | TruthOrFake Blog