TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Court rejects California's claim that Trump violated federal law in troop federalization.

Fact Check: Court rejects California's claim that Trump violated federal law in troop federalization.

Published June 20, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
i
VERDICT
Needs Research

# Fact Check: Court Rejects California's Claim that Trump Violated Federal Law in Troop Federalization ## What We Know The claim that a court has rej...

Fact Check: Court Rejects California's Claim that Trump Violated Federal Law in Troop Federalization

What We Know

The claim that a court has rejected California's assertion that President Trump violated federal law in the federalization of California National Guard troops has been a topic of recent legal discussions. A federal appeals court ruled that Trump can maintain control over California National Guard troops, specifically in Los Angeles, which aligns with the federal government's authority to federalize state troops under certain circumstances (NPR). This ruling suggests that the court found no violation of federal law in Trump's actions regarding the National Guard.

In contrast, some legal experts have argued that Trump's federalization of the National Guard was illegal, citing concerns over the proper use of federal authority and the implications for state sovereignty (Reason). The debate centers around the interpretation of federal law and the extent of presidential power in deploying state troops for federal purposes.

Analysis

The evidence surrounding this claim presents a complex legal landscape. The ruling by the federal appeals court, as reported by NBC News, indicates that the court upheld Trump's directives, which could be interpreted as a validation of his actions. However, the dissenting opinions from legal scholars and some court rulings suggest that there is significant contention regarding the legality of federalizing state troops without clear justification or necessity (Reason).

The reliability of the sources varies. The NPR and NBC News articles are credible news outlets providing timely updates on the legal proceedings, while the Reason article presents a more critical perspective, arguing against the legality of Trump's actions. This divergence highlights the ongoing debate and the need for further legal clarification on the matter.

Moreover, the context of the ruling is essential. The court's decision does not necessarily imply that Trump's actions were beyond reproach; rather, it indicates that, under the current interpretation of federal law, the court found sufficient grounds to support the federalization of the National Guard troops (NPR).

Conclusion

Needs Research: The claim that a court has definitively rejected California's assertion regarding Trump's violation of federal law is not straightforward. The ruling supports Trump's control over the National Guard, but there are significant legal arguments suggesting that this federalization may still be contested. Further research is necessary to fully understand the implications of the court's decision and the ongoing legal debates surrounding the federalization of state troops.

Sources

  1. About California | CA.gov
  2. filed
  3. California - Wikipedia
  4. An appeals court backs Trump's control of the California National Guard
  5. California - Simple English Wikipedia
  6. Federal Court Rightly Invalidates Trump's Illegal Federalization of California National Guard Troops
  7. California | Flag, Facts, Maps, Capital, Cities, & Destinations
  8. Trump administration can keep control of California National Guard

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Paul Krugman Paul Krugman We’re All Rats Now Time to take a stand, again, against racism Paul Krugman Jun 30, 2025 Zohran Mamdani’s upset victory in New York’s Democratic primary has created panic in MAGAland. Stephen Miller, the architect of Donald Trump’s deportation policies, waxed apocalyptic: Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, declared that New York is about to turn into “Caracas on the Hudson.” And Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama basically declared New York’s voters subhuman, saying: These inner-city rats, they live off the federal government. And that’s one reason we’re $37 trillion in debt. And it’s time we find these rats and we send them back home, that are living off the American taxpayers that are working very hard every week to pay taxes. These reactions are vile, and they’re also dishonest. Whatever these men may claim, it’s all about bigotry. Miller isn’t concerned about the state of New York “society.” What bothers him is the idea of nonwhite people having political power. Bessent isn’t really deeply worried about Zamdani’s economic ideas. But he feels free, maybe even obliged, to slander a foreign-born Muslim with language he would never use about a white Christian politician, even if that politician were (like some of his colleagues in the Trump administration) a total crackpot. And while Tuberville stands out even within his caucus as an ignorant fool, his willingness to use dehumanizing language about millions of people shows that raw racism is rapidly becoming mainstream in American politics. Remember, during the campaign both Trump and JD Vance amplified the slanders about Haitians eating pets. And now that they’re in office, you can see the resurgence of raw racism all across Trump administration policies, large and small. You can see it, for example, in the cuts at the National Institutes of Health, which are so tilted against racial minorities that a federal judge — one appointed by Ronald Reagan! — declared I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this. You can see it in the renaming of military bases after Confederate generals — that is, traitors who fought for slavery. You can even see it in a change in the military’s shaving policy that is clearly custom-designed to drive Black men — who account for around a quarter of the Army’s new recruits — out of the service. So racism and bigotry are back, big time. Who’s safe? Nobody. Are you a legal immigrant? Well, the Supreme Court just allowed Trump to summarily strip half a million U.S. residents of that status, and only a fool would imagine that this is the end of the story. Anyway, when masked men who claim to be ICE agents but refuse to show identification are grabbing people off the streets because they think those people look illegal, does legal status even matter? Does it even matter if you’re a U.S. citizen? And the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is set to massively increase ICE’s funding — basically setting up a huge national secret police force. Now, maybe you imagine that you yourself won’t suffer from this new reign of bigotry and imagine that everyone you care about is similarly safe. But if that’s what you think, you’re likely to face a rude awakening. I personally don’t have any illusions of safety. Yes, I’m a native-born white citizen. But my wife and her family are Black, and some of my friends and relatives are foreign-born U.S. citizens. Furthermore, I’m Jewish, and anyone who knows their history realizes that whenever right-wing bigotry is on the ascendant, we’re always next in line. Are there really people out there naïve enough to believe MAGA’s claims to be against antisemitism, who can’t see the transparent cynicism and dishonesty? The fact is that the Trump administration already contains a number of figures with strong ties to antisemitic extremists. The Great Replacement Theory, which has de facto become part of MAGA’s ideology, doesn’t just say that there’s a conspiracy to replace whites with people of color; it says that it’s a Jewish conspiracy. So I’m definitely scared of what the many antisemites inside or with close ties to the Trump administration may eventually do. And no, I’m not frightened at all by the prospect that New York may soon have a somewhat leftist Muslim mayor. Anyway, my personal fears are beside the point. Everyone who cares about keeping America America needs to take a stand against the resurgence of bigotry. Because the truth is that we’re all rats now. MUSICAL CODA Discussion about this post Michael Roseman Jun 30 Edited For a while, American bigotry was ashamed of itself. Or pretended to be. Now it runs the government. Reply Share 106 replies Megan Rothery Jun 30 Edited Take a stand - Call. Write. Email. Protest. Unrelentingly. Use/share this spreadsheet as a resource to call/email/write members of Congress, the Cabinet and news organizations. Reach out to those in your own state, as well as those in others. Use your voice and make some “good trouble” ❤️‍🩹🤍💙 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13lYafj0P-6owAJcH-5_xcpcRvMUZI7rkBPW-Ma9e7hw/edit?usp=drivesdk Reply Share 31 replies 852 more comments... No posts Ready for more? © 2025 Paul Krugman Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice Start writing Get the app Substack is the home for great culture

Jul 20, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Supreme Court is enabling executive lawlessness under Trump without explanation.
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Supreme Court is enabling executive lawlessness under Trump without explanation.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Supreme Court is enabling executive lawlessness under Trump without explanation.

Jul 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Supreme Court is enabling executive lawlessness under Trump.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: The Supreme Court is enabling executive lawlessness under Trump.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Supreme Court is enabling executive lawlessness under Trump.

Jul 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: 🔍 WHEN THERE’S NO ONE LEFT TO WATCH THE POWERFUL Sections 50002, 50003, 80121(h): Guts the CFPB, PCAOB, and court oversight of fossil fuel permits. ➡️ Corporate fraud? Unsafe consumer products? Toxic pollution? Nobody’s checking. Nobody’s stopping it. ➡️ The powerful will act with impunity—because Trump removed the referees.
Partially True

Fact Check: 🔍 WHEN THERE’S NO ONE LEFT TO WATCH THE POWERFUL Sections 50002, 50003, 80121(h): Guts the CFPB, PCAOB, and court oversight of fossil fuel permits. ➡️ Corporate fraud? Unsafe consumer products? Toxic pollution? Nobody’s checking. Nobody’s stopping it. ➡️ The powerful will act with impunity—because Trump removed the referees.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: 🔍 WHEN THERE’S NO ONE LEFT TO WATCH THE POWERFUL Sections 50002, 50003, 80121(h): Guts the CFPB, PCAOB, and court oversight of fossil fuel permits. ➡️ Corporate fraud? Unsafe consumer products? Toxic pollution? Nobody’s checking. Nobody’s stopping it. ➡️ The powerful will act with impunity—because Trump removed the referees.

Jul 7, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Supreme Court's decision to permit executive violations is an existential threat to law.
Partially True

Fact Check: The Supreme Court's decision to permit executive violations is an existential threat to law.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Supreme Court's decision to permit executive violations is an existential threat to law.

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The Supreme Court's rulings create an existential threat to the rule of law.
Unverified

Fact Check: The Supreme Court's rulings create an existential threat to the rule of law.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Supreme Court's rulings create an existential threat to the rule of law.

Jul 7, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks