TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Congress is negotiating over the authority to appoint the Librarian of Congress.

Fact Check: Congress is negotiating over the authority to appoint the Librarian of Congress.

Published June 27, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: "Congress is negotiating over the authority to appoint the Librarian of Congress." ## What We Know The claim that "Congress is negotiat...

Fact Check: "Congress is negotiating over the authority to appoint the Librarian of Congress."

What We Know

The claim that "Congress is negotiating over the authority to appoint the Librarian of Congress" lacks substantial evidence. The current legislative activity surrounding the Librarian of Congress primarily involves the promotion of digital resources rather than changes to the appointment process. For instance, the bill H.R.1234, introduced in the 119th Congress, focuses on directing the Librarian to enhance the availability of the Annotated Constitution through digital formats, rather than altering the appointment authority of the Librarian (source-1).

Moreover, the Librarian of Congress, Dr. Carla Hayden, has been actively involved in oversight hearings, indicating that her role is currently stable and not under negotiation (source-2).

Analysis

The assertion that Congress is negotiating the appointment authority of the Librarian of Congress appears to be unfounded. The legislative focus, as evidenced by recent bills and committee reports, is on operational aspects of the Library rather than its leadership structure. H.R.1234, which has passed the House, emphasizes cost-effective digital solutions rather than any changes to how the Librarian is appointed (source-1, source-3).

Additionally, the context surrounding the Librarian's position has been marked by stability. Despite political tensions and discussions about leadership changes, such as President Trump's actions regarding the Librarian's position, there is no current legislative movement to alter the appointment authority itself (source-4, source-5).

The sources discussing the Librarian's role and the legislative focus are credible, coming from official congressional records and established news outlets. However, they do not support the claim that Congress is actively negotiating changes to the appointment authority of the Librarian.

Conclusion

Verdict: False
The claim that "Congress is negotiating over the authority to appoint the Librarian of Congress" is not supported by current legislative activities or credible reports. The focus remains on operational improvements rather than changes to the appointment process, indicating that the claim is misleading.

Sources

  1. Text - H.R.1234 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): To direct ...
  2. Top Takeaways from Full Committee Hearing on Oversight of ...
  3. H. Rept. 118-632 - TO DIRECT THE LIBRARIAN OF ...
  4. President Trump purports to install new officials at the ...
  5. US deputy attorney general tapped to serve as acting librarian of Congress

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Trump's authority over foreign policy should be unchecked by Congress.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Trump's authority over foreign policy should be unchecked by Congress.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Trump's authority over foreign policy should be unchecked by Congress.

Jul 9, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 For all of their strutting about protesting that they support democracy. Not a one of them gave a damn about democracy when they pulled Biden off the ballot and dropped Kamala Harris in without a single Democrat primary voter voting for him. And you know what? Not a single Democrat is here today because not a single one of them gives a damn about the fact that they lied to the American people for four years. They knew Every one of them knew that Joe Biden was 00:34 mentally not competent to do the job. The White House Press Secretary. She knew when she stood in front of the American people and lied over and over and over again and they're not here because they can't defend themselves. It wasn't a surprise for four years the White House hid President Biden from Republican Senators. Would not let him meet with us. He served 40 years in this body. We all know him. And they deliberately lied and by the way Jake Tapper had a bombshell 01:08 book exposing the incredible scandal that Biden's mental decline was covered up by Jake Tapper. There's a Yiddish word and that truly is how dare we lie and cover up what we all knew. Now I have been asked literally a thousand times by Texans. Was running the country? And I'm going to give 01:40 you the most terrifying answer. I don't know. I genuinely don't know. And not a single Democrat here cares. The most telling proof of Biden's decline came with the signature of the president. The symbol of executive authority that was outsourced to a machine. Mister Wald you're a lawyer who served in the White House Council's Office. You understand the gravity of presidential action. Does the president's signature 02:10 carry legal and constitutional weight under article two? Yes. Is the act of signing an executive order or signing a law or granting a pardon a delegable duty of the president. Uh so in that opinion in 2005 from OLC they said essentially that an autopin could be used by a subordinate but the president's determination as to sign the document can never be delegated. Can that authority 02:41 be transferred to a staff or a machine without the president's explicit authorization? Never. And if you look at the statistics, the statistics are stunning. In 2021, President Biden issued 78 executive orders. None were signed with an auto pen. That first year the presidency, Biden I suppose was relatively lucid and 78 executive orders he signed by hand. The second year, however, we see the auto pen emerged. 03:15 The first auto pen executive order was issued on 15th 2022. After that day 100% of the executive orders issued in 2022 were signed by an autopen. In 2023 Biden issued twenty-four executive orders. 16 were auto penned. In 20twenty-four Biden issued 19. 14 were auto penned. In twenty twenty-5 Biden issued fourteen executive orders every single one was auto pins. 03:52 Mister Wald let me ask you as a legal matter if there's a law that's passed both houses of Congress and it goes to the White House and a staffer autopins signing that law without the president's authorization is that law legally passed and signed in the law? No. If an executive order is issued and a staffer autopins it without the president's authorization, is that executive order legally binding? No. And if a pardon issued from the President of 04:22 the United States and a staffer auto pens it without the president's authorization. Is that pardon legally binding? No. Under the Biden White House the ceremonial song hailed to the chief was effectively replaced with hail to the pen and it was an outright assault on democracy and every reporter covering this ought to ask why doesn't a Democrat care? We heard about the moral responsibilities of a staffer. 04:54 How about an elected senator who knows damn well that if we get into a war and Iran is preparing to fire a nuclear weapon at the United States that the commander in chief is busy playing with his jello and he's not competent to defend ourselves and every member of the cabinet, the chief of staff, the press secretary, and the members of Congress who lied about this on a daily basis with the press's complicity. They are all responsible for subverting democracy. Angry Ted Cruz is perhaps my favorite version of 05:27 Ted Cruz because when he's getting history on it, you might want to take a listen. He is definitely angry that there's some acting going on here in the line of hail to the chief change from hail to the pen that's not a smart line but it's still the truth. The truth is in this video right here ladies and gentlemen. The change in the way Joe Biden used the autopin is a steady upward moving graph from twenty twenty-one to the end of his presidency in early twenty 05:58 twenty-five. Okay? That is a noticeable issue. And if he does not directly authorize the autopin we've got We've got grounds to go through every single law Joe Biden has signed that way and perhaps ignore them all together. There's way more evidence behind the autopin theory and hopefully it ends up sticking. I I hope it does because I think this is in a way worse than the Bill Clinton perjury case. Cuz Bill 06:28 Clinton basically lied before Congress lied directly to the American people lied under oath. This is worse in a way. Because lying under oath means that you know where the truth is and you're just hoping to get away with it and there's a direct law. This however Signing with the auto pin is more opaque. It is an ultimate he said she said and you're dont rate the opinion oo just fact if there is

Jul 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: US congress is trying to block anime from the US
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: US congress is trying to block anime from the US

Detailed fact-check analysis of: US congress is trying to block anime from the US

Aug 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donald Trump done more in Joe Biden dead in 50 years of Congress and president
False

Fact Check: Donald Trump done more in Joe Biden dead in 50 years of Congress and president

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donald Trump done more in Joe Biden dead in 50 years of Congress and president

Jul 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The President does not need Congress's permission to reorganize federal agencies.
False

Fact Check: The President does not need Congress's permission to reorganize federal agencies.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The President does not need Congress's permission to reorganize federal agencies.

Jul 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Here's 8 things Congress has enacted that I'd be willing to bet wouldn't have been passed if someone had to say these things on live TV: Cannot determine - wrong language 4 1. $465,339-Teaching Pigeons to Gamble 2, 2.3m dollars injecting beagles with cocain 3,385k studying duck penises 4, 75k blowiing lizard out of trees with leaf blowers
Unverified

Fact Check: Here's 8 things Congress has enacted that I'd be willing to bet wouldn't have been passed if someone had to say these things on live TV: Cannot determine - wrong language 4 1. $465,339-Teaching Pigeons to Gamble 2, 2.3m dollars injecting beagles with cocain 3,385k studying duck penises 4, 75k blowiing lizard out of trees with leaf blowers

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Here's 8 things Congress has enacted that I'd be willing to bet wouldn't have been passed if someone had to say these things on live TV: Cannot determine - wrong language 4 1. $465,339-Teaching Pigeons to Gamble 2, 2.3m dollars injecting beagles with cocain 3,385k studying duck penises 4, 75k blowiing lizard out of trees with leaf blowers

Aug 10, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks