Fact Check: Class actions against the government are prohibitively expensive and time-consuming.

Fact Check: Class actions against the government are prohibitively expensive and time-consuming.

Published June 28, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: "Class actions against the government are prohibitively expensive and time-consuming." ## What We Know The claim that class actions aga...

Fact Check: "Class actions against the government are prohibitively expensive and time-consuming."

What We Know

The claim that class actions against the government are prohibitively expensive and time-consuming can be examined through various sources that discuss litigation costs, the structure of class actions, and the specific context of government-related lawsuits.

  1. Filing Fees: According to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims Fee Schedule, the filing fee for a civil action is $350, with additional costs for reproducing records and other administrative fees. While this fee may not seem excessive, it can accumulate when combined with other costs associated with litigation.

  2. Litigation Costs: A report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) highlights that defending lawsuits can incur significant costs, although it does not explicitly quantify the costs associated with class actions against the government. However, it indicates that legal representation can be costly and complex.

  3. Challenges in Legal Representation: An article titled Exhausting Government Class Actions discusses the difficulties faced by plaintiffs in government class actions, including low attorney fees, long delays, and the challenges of navigating a complex legal system. This suggests that while class actions may be a viable legal avenue, they can also be fraught with obstacles that make them time-consuming and potentially expensive.

  4. Class Action Dynamics: The book The Conservative Case for Class Actions argues that class actions serve as a means of enforcing laws against corporations and can be beneficial in holding entities accountable. However, it also acknowledges that the system can be manipulated, leading to concerns about meritless lawsuits and the financial burdens they impose on defendants, which can indirectly affect the costs associated with class actions.

Analysis

The evidence suggests that while there are costs associated with filing class actions against the government, the claim that they are "prohibitively expensive" may be an exaggeration. The initial filing fee of $350 is relatively low compared to other legal costs, but additional fees can accumulate, particularly in complex cases.

The GAO report indicates that litigation can be costly, but it does not provide specific figures for class actions against the government, making it difficult to assess the full financial burden. The challenges outlined in the Exhausting Government Class Actions article highlight that while class actions can be a powerful tool for accountability, they often involve significant delays and complexities that can deter potential plaintiffs.

Moreover, the Conservative Case for Class Actions presents a nuanced view, suggesting that while there are criticisms of the class action system, it also serves an important role in legal accountability. This indicates that the perception of class actions as prohibitively expensive may stem from the broader complexities of the legal system rather than the costs alone.

Conclusion

The verdict on the claim that "class actions against the government are prohibitively expensive and time-consuming" is Partially True. While there are indeed costs and complexities associated with class actions, the initial financial barriers are not as high as the claim suggests. However, the challenges of navigating the legal system, including potential delays and the intricacies of representation, contribute to the perception that these actions are burdensome. Thus, the claim captures some truth but does not fully represent the nuances involved in government class actions.

Sources

  1. U.S. Court of Federal Claims Fee Schedule
  2. The Conservative Case for Class Actions | Judicature
  3. Litigation Costs For Justice and Agencies Could Not Be ...
  4. Exhausting Government Class Actions

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Bills quarterback Josh Allen has rejected a staggering $15 million endorsement deal from a major real estate developer — taking a stand against what he calls the displacement of working-class families in Buffalo
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Bills quarterback Josh Allen has rejected a staggering $15 million endorsement deal from a major real estate developer — taking a stand against what he calls the displacement of working-class families in Buffalo

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Bills quarterback Josh Allen has rejected a staggering $15 million endorsement deal from a major real estate developer — taking a stand against what he calls the displacement of working-class families in Buffalo

Aug 15, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Legally binding quotas are the only solution to overcome class bias in Germany.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Legally binding quotas are the only solution to overcome class bias in Germany.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Legally binding quotas are the only solution to overcome class bias in Germany.

Jul 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Democrats have approval ratings below 35 percent among Hispanic men and working-class voters.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Democrats have approval ratings below 35 percent among Hispanic men and working-class voters.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Democrats have approval ratings below 35 percent among Hispanic men and working-class voters.

Jul 14, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Lower home prices are necessary for a prosperous Toronto middle class.
True

Fact Check: Lower home prices are necessary for a prosperous Toronto middle class.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Lower home prices are necessary for a prosperous Toronto middle class.

Jul 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: The One Big Beautiful Bill delivers the largest middle- and working-class tax cut in U.S. history.
True

Fact Check: The One Big Beautiful Bill delivers the largest middle- and working-class tax cut in U.S. history.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The One Big Beautiful Bill delivers the largest middle- and working-class tax cut in U.S. history.

Jul 4, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Federal grants for education can be used for professional development and class size reduction.
True

Fact Check: Federal grants for education can be used for professional development and class size reduction.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Federal grants for education can be used for professional development and class size reduction.

Jul 3, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Class actions against the government are prohibitively expensive and time-consuming. | TruthOrFake Blog