Fact Check: "Class action lawsuits against Trump’s order are prohibitively expensive."
What We Know
The claim that class action lawsuits against President Trump's executive orders are "prohibitively expensive" lacks direct evidence and context regarding the financial implications of such legal actions. While it is true that litigation, especially class action lawsuits, can involve significant costs, the specifics of these costs can vary widely based on numerous factors, including the complexity of the case, the legal representation chosen, and the jurisdiction in which the case is filed.
Recent reports indicate that there have been numerous legal challenges to Trump's executive actions, with at least 191 rulings temporarily pausing various initiatives as of June 27, 2025 (source-1). These lawsuits encompass a range of issues, including immigration policies and executive orders affecting educational institutions (source-3).
The Supreme Court has also recently ruled on cases related to Trump's orders, which may influence the financial viability of pursuing class actions against such policies (source-5). The court's decision to narrow the scope of injunctions makes it more challenging for plaintiffs to block executive actions, potentially impacting the willingness of individuals or groups to engage in costly litigation.
Analysis
Evaluating the claim requires consideration of both the costs associated with class action lawsuits and the broader context of legal challenges against executive orders. Class action lawsuits can be expensive due to the need for extensive legal research, expert witnesses, and the potential for long trial durations. However, many organizations, particularly advocacy groups, often have resources or funding specifically allocated for such legal battles, which can mitigate individual costs for plaintiffs (source-3).
Moreover, the assertion that these lawsuits are "prohibitively expensive" may not fully capture the motivations behind pursuing them. Legal challenges to executive orders often stem from significant public interest issues, such as immigration rights or civil liberties, which can drive organizations to pursue these cases despite potential costs. The Supreme Court's recent rulings suggest that while the legal landscape is becoming more challenging for plaintiffs, it does not necessarily deter all legal actions (source-7).
The reliability of sources discussing the costs of litigation varies. Reports from legal advocacy groups and news outlets provide insights into the financial aspects of lawsuits but may also reflect their organizational biases. Therefore, while the claim about prohibitive costs has some basis in the reality of legal expenses, it lacks comprehensive evidence and context to be definitively categorized as true.
Conclusion
Needs Research. The claim that class action lawsuits against Trump’s orders are prohibitively expensive is not sufficiently substantiated by available evidence. While litigation can be costly, the specific financial implications depend on various factors, including the nature of the case and the resources available to plaintiffs. Further research is needed to provide a clearer picture of the costs associated with these lawsuits and the motivations behind pursuing them.
