Fact Check: Churches can now legally endorse political candidates without losing tax-exempt status.

Fact Check: Churches can now legally endorse political candidates without losing tax-exempt status.

Published July 10, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact Check: Churches Can Now Legally Endorse Political Candidates Without Losing Tax-Exempt Status ## What We Know Recently, the Internal Revenue S...

Fact Check: Churches Can Now Legally Endorse Political Candidates Without Losing Tax-Exempt Status

What We Know

Recently, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) announced that churches and other houses of worship can endorse political candidates without risking their tax-exempt status. This decision stems from a court filing related to a lawsuit by the National Religious Broadcasters and two Texas churches, which challenged the longstanding Johnson Amendment that has prohibited such endorsements since 1954 (NPR, NY Times).

The IRS's statement indicates that when a church communicates its endorsement to its congregation through customary channels during religious services, it does not constitute participation in a political campaign. The IRS likened this to a "family discussion" about candidates, suggesting that such communications are permissible under the law (Reuters, Christianity Today).

Historically, the IRS has rarely enforced the Johnson Amendment against churches, with only one church losing its tax-exempt status due to political activity in 1992 (NPR, Christianity Today). The recent IRS announcement appears to formalize a practice that has been largely unchallenged in recent years.

Analysis

The claim that churches can now endorse political candidates without losing tax-exempt status is partially true. While the IRS's recent court filing does provide a clearer framework for churches to endorse candidates, it does not entirely eliminate the restrictions imposed by the Johnson Amendment. The IRS has stated that endorsements made in the context of religious services are not considered political campaigning, which may encourage more churches to engage in political endorsements without fear of repercussions (NY Times, Reuters).

However, experts caution that this ruling does not fundamentally change the enforcement landscape of the Johnson Amendment. Sam Brunson, a tax law expert, noted that the IRS's legal agreement may not significantly alter how the Johnson Amendment has functioned in practice, as enforcement has historically been minimal (NPR).

Moreover, the National Council of Nonprofits has expressed concerns that this decision could blur the lines between religious organizations and political action committees, potentially leading to increased political financing through nonprofits (NY Times). This perspective highlights the potential for misuse of tax-exempt status for political gain, raising ethical questions about the implications of this ruling.

Conclusion

The verdict is Partially True. The IRS's recent announcement does allow churches to endorse political candidates without losing their tax-exempt status, but it does not completely remove the restrictions of the Johnson Amendment. The ruling may encourage more churches to engage in political discourse, but the historical context of minimal enforcement suggests that significant changes in practice may be limited. The implications of this decision warrant careful consideration, particularly regarding the potential for political influence within religious institutions.

Sources

  1. IRS says churches can now endorse political candidates
  2. I.R.S. Says Churches Can Endorse Candidates ...
  3. Churches can endorse political candidates to ...
  4. Trump welcomes IRS decision to let churches endorse ...
  5. IRS: Churches can endorse political candidates without tax ...
  6. Churches Can Endorse Political Candidates, IRS Says
  7. IRS says churches can endorse political candidates without ...
  8. IRS moves to allow political engagement from churches, in ...

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Churches can endorse political candidates without losing tax-exempt status.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Churches can endorse political candidates without losing tax-exempt status.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Churches can endorse political candidates without losing tax-exempt status.

Jul 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Churches can endorse political candidates without violating tax-exempt status.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Churches can endorse political candidates without violating tax-exempt status.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Churches can endorse political candidates without violating tax-exempt status.

Jul 8, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Evangelical churches are losing members due to political involvement with Trump.
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Evangelical churches are losing members due to political involvement with Trump.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Evangelical churches are losing members due to political involvement with Trump.

Jul 12, 2025
Read more →
🔍
Partially True

Fact Check: The Liberal government’s MPs backed a dangerous recommendation to strip churches of their charitable status, threatening the heart of our communities (House of Commons Finance Committee Report 21, Dec 2024: https://www.ourcommons.ca/Documen.../en/44-1/FINA/report-21/). Recommendation 430 proposes removing “advancement of religion” as a charitable purpose, which could cost Canada’s 34,000 religious charities—40% of all charities—billions, end tax-deductible donations, and force many to close (B.C. Humanist Association, 2024: https://www.bchumanist.ca/finance_committee_recommends...). This would devastate vital services like food banks, shelters, and youth programs run by groups like the Salvation Army and local parishes. Don’t be fooled by last-minute Liberal denials. This election, your vote can protect the good work of religious charities that serve millions. On the eve of a day when people of all faiths unite in mourning, let’s stand together to preserve our sacred spaces. Vote to defend our churches! 🗳️ Sources: - House of Commons Finance Committee Report 21: https://www.ourcommons.ca/Documen.../en/44-1/FINA/report-21/ - B.C. Humanist Association: https://www.bchumanist.ca/finance_committee_recommends... - Christianity Today, 2024: https://www.christianitytoday.com/.../canada-church... #SaveOurChurches #ProtectFaith #CommunityMatters See less

Detailed fact-check analysis of: The Liberal government’s MPs backed a dangerous recommendation to strip churches of their charitable status, threatening the heart of our communities (House of Commons Finance Committee Report 21, Dec 2024: https://www.ourcommons.ca/Documen.../en/44-1/FINA/report-21/). Recommendation 430 proposes removing “advancement of religion” as a charitable purpose, which could cost Canada’s 34,000 religious charities—40% of all charities—billions, end tax-deductible donations, and force many to close (B.C. Humanist Association, 2024: https://www.bchumanist.ca/finance_committee_recommends...). This would devastate vital services like food banks, shelters, and youth programs run by groups like the Salvation Army and local parishes. Don’t be fooled by last-minute Liberal denials. This election, your vote can protect the good work of religious charities that serve millions. On the eve of a day when people of all faiths unite in mourning, let’s stand together to preserve our sacred spaces. Vote to defend our churches! 🗳️ Sources: - House of Commons Finance Committee Report 21: https://www.ourcommons.ca/Documen.../en/44-1/FINA/report-21/ - B.C. Humanist Association: https://www.bchumanist.ca/finance_committee_recommends... - Christianity Today, 2024: https://www.christianitytoday.com/.../canada-church... #SaveOurChurches #ProtectFaith #CommunityMatters See less

Apr 27, 2025
Read more →
🔍
True

Fact Check: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Autistic Non-Verbal Episodes in Marriage: Why Words Vanish Sometimes and What to Do About It Neurodiverse Couples Tuesday, august 12, 2025. Here’s the scene: You’re in the middle of a conversation with your spouse. Maybe the topic is small (“Did you pay the water bill?”) or monumental (“Are we happy?”). And then—without warning—your autistic partner’s voice disappears. No yelling, no slammed doors. Just… gone. You’re left holding the conversational steering wheel while they’ve quietly climbed into the trunk. If you’ve never lived with high-functioning autism, this can be tragically misconstrued as stonewalling or contempt. It isn’t. It’s just neurology pulling the emergency brake. Why This Happens: The Science Without the Lab Coat Smell For autistic adults, losing speech under stress is often a shutdown—a form of nervous system overload that knocks language production offline. Think of it like your phone freezing: all the apps are still there, but none of them open when you tap. Research calls this autistic burnout when it happens in a longer, chronic cycle—linked to masking (Hull et al., 2017; Raymaker et al., 2020). Masking is the art of “performing normal” so well that non-autistic people think you’re fine. The issue is that it eats through your energy reserves like a car idling in traffic with the A/C on full blast (Mantzalas et al., 2022). Eventually, one hard conversation can tip you from functional to frozen. And here’s where couples therapy meets neuroscience: physiological flooding—the body’s fight/flight/freeze switch—is a known relationship killer (Malik et al., 2019; Gottman Institute, 2024). In other words, for some autistic partners, flooding may tend to show up sooner, last longer, and is more likely to pull the plug on speech entirely. The Danger Loop in Marriage Autistic partner goes non-verbal — brain says “nope.” Non-autistic partner reads it as avoidance — brain says “attack.” Pressure increases — “Just say something.” Shutdown deepens — and now you’ve both lost. Do that a few hundred times and you’ll start conflating a physiological response into a moral failing. That’s the real marriage-killer. The Protocol: Three Phases, Zero Guesswork This is where we get practical. You can’t “love away” a temporary shutdown, but you can stop it from turning into World War III. Before: Build the Net Name the state. Agree on a phrase or signal ( I call this a couple code)—such as “words offline,” “shutdown,” a hand over the heart. The point is to make the invisible visible. The Shutdown Card. A literal card that says: I can’t speak right now. Please lower lights, reduce sound, give me X minutes. I promise I will circle back. The Pause Rule. Require a minimum of 20 minutes before resuming any tough talk. Autistic partner may need 90+. Agree ahead of time. Downgrade Kit. the usual gear; earplugs, soft light, weighted blanket, fidget, a quiet room. You know, human decency in object form. Reduce Daily Load. Avoid heavy talks right after work or big social events. Chronic overload makes a nervous shutdown more probable. During: Do Less, Better Autistic Partner: Give the signal. Exit stimulation. Switch channels if possible (text, notes app, yes/no cards). Send a short pre-written message: “Safe, can’t talk, back at 8:15.” Non-Autistic Partner: Acknowledge once—“Got it, I’m with you.” Hold the pause boundary. Lower stimuli. Go regulate your own nervous system—walk, journal, pet the dog. Don’t rehearse comebacks. Both: Avoid sarcasm, interrogation, ultimatums. Nothing lengthens a shutdown like moral outrage. After: Close the Loop Check in: “Are you ready to talk, or should we start in text?” Debrief: Identify triggers and what helped. Solve the actual problem. No conflict gets left to rot in the corner. Spot burnout early. If shutdowns start clustering, it’s time to reduce demands, not double them. How This Isn’t Stonewalling Stonewalling is a choice. Shutdown is a lockout. Stonewalling says, “I won’t talk to you.” Shutdown says, “I can’t talk to you yet, but I will.” The key difference? Repair intention. A shutdown protocol builds that right into the process. The Ten-Minute At-Home Drill Co-create your signal and card. Agree on a pause window. Pack the downgrade kit. Rehearse the exchange (“Got it, I’m with you.”). Check in weekly to tweak the system. Remember, you’re not aiming for zero shutdowns. You’re aiming for shorter, kinder, safer ones. Why This Works Because it matches lived autistic experience (Raymaker et al., 2020; Lewis et al., 2023). Because it honors nervous system limits instead of punishing them (Malik et al., 2019). Because it lets both partners keep their dignity and still solve the problem. In other words: you’re building a marriage that can survive the occasional moments when the words are gone for the time being. Be Well, Stay Kind, and Godspeed. REFERENCES: Hull, L., Mandy, W., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Allison, C., Smith, P., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Autism, 21(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012 Raymaker, D. M., Teo, A. R., Steckler, N. A., Lentz, B., Scharer, M., Delos Santos, A., … & Nicolaidis, C. (2020). “Having all of your internal resources exhausted beyond measure and being left with no clean-up crew”: Defining autistic burnout. Autism in Adulthood, 2(2), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2019.0079 Mantzalas, J., Richdale, A. L., Adikari, A., Lowe, J., & Dissanayake, C. (2022). What Is Autistic Burnout? A thematic analysis of posts on two online platforms. Autism in Adulthood, 4(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0079 Lewis, L. F., et al. (2023). The lived experience of meltdowns for autistic adults. Autism, 27(7), 1787–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221145783 Malik, J., et al. (2019). Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in romantic relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1641188 Gottman Institute. (2024, March 4). Making sure emotional flooding doesn’t capsize your relationship. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/making-sure-emotional-flooding-doesnt-capsize-your-relationship/

Aug 12, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Water in space quickly evaporates into water vapor, it quickly freezes. Now it depends on how close you are to the Sun or whether you are hidden from it when it comes to what happens next. Close to the Sun, in full sunlight water would eventually vaporize. That's why on Mercury and the Moon, ice only exists in permanently shadowed craters. But because the outer solar system is far from the Sun, ice can exist on the surface without any problems.
Partially True

Fact Check: Water in space quickly evaporates into water vapor, it quickly freezes. Now it depends on how close you are to the Sun or whether you are hidden from it when it comes to what happens next. Close to the Sun, in full sunlight water would eventually vaporize. That's why on Mercury and the Moon, ice only exists in permanently shadowed craters. But because the outer solar system is far from the Sun, ice can exist on the surface without any problems.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Water in space quickly evaporates into water vapor, it quickly freezes. Now it depends on how close you are to the Sun or whether you are hidden from it when it comes to what happens next. Close to the Sun, in full sunlight water would eventually vaporize. That's why on Mercury and the Moon, ice only exists in permanently shadowed craters. But because the outer solar system is far from the Sun, ice can exist on the surface without any problems.

Aug 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Churches can now legally endorse political candidates without losing tax-exempt status. | TruthOrFake Blog