Fact Check: Cgtn is biased

Fact Check: Cgtn is biased

Published August 6, 2025
±
VERDICT
Partially True

# Fact-Check: "CGTN is Biased" ## What We Know The **China Global Television Network (CGTN)** is an international media organization owned by China C...

Fact-Check: "CGTN is Biased"

What We Know

The China Global Television Network (CGTN) is an international media organization owned by China Central Television (CCTV), launched on December 31, 2016. CGTN aims to provide a balanced view of global news, claiming to foster understanding of international events (Media Bias Fact Check). However, it has been characterized as promoting pro-state propaganda and engaging in heavy censorship. According to a report by Reporters Without Borders, China ranks 179 out of 180 in the World Press Freedom Index, indicating severe restrictions on press freedom (Reporters Without Borders).

CGTN's funding comes directly from the Chinese government, and it operates without advertising revenue. This financial structure raises concerns about its editorial independence (Media Bias Fact Check). The network has been involved in a global media expansion campaign, which aims to serve as a mouthpiece for the Chinese Communist Party (Foreign Policy).

While CGTN's reporting on domestic issues can appear neutral, its coverage of the Chinese government is often favorable, with little to no criticism of President Xi Jinping (Media Bias Fact Check). In contrast, its international coverage tends to be more cautious, using credible sources like AFP and Reuters, though it still exhibits bias by omission regarding critical perspectives on China (Media Bias Fact Check).

Analysis

The claim that CGTN is biased is supported by multiple sources that highlight its propaganda and censorship practices. The Media Bias Fact Check rates CGTN as having a mixed factual reporting and a left-center bias, indicating that while some of its reporting may be factual, it often omits critical viewpoints, particularly regarding the Chinese government (Media Bias Fact Check).

Moreover, a study published in SAGE Journals noted that CGTN's selective fact-sharing creates a distorted image of China, portraying it as an idealized society while neglecting significant issues (SAGE Journals). This aligns with the findings from Public Opinion Propaganda, which cautioned against the reliability of CGTN's surveys, as they tend to reflect the views of a biased sample (USCNP).

On the other hand, some reports, such as those from Tehran Times, argue that CGTN offers a credible alternative to what they describe as biased Western media, suggesting that CGTN's advancements in media technology and its global reach provide a different perspective on international news (Tehran Times). This perspective, however, may be influenced by the network's own narrative and should be viewed with caution.

In summary, while CGTN does provide some factual reporting, its overarching mission to promote a favorable view of the Chinese government and its lack of critical coverage of state affairs contribute to its classification as biased.

Conclusion

The claim that "CGTN is biased" is Partially True. While CGTN does present some factual information and employs credible sources in its reporting, its consistent bias by omission regarding the Chinese government and its role as a state-funded media outlet significantly undermine its credibility. The network's portrayal of international events often lacks critical perspectives, particularly concerning its own government, which supports the assertion of bias.

Sources

  1. Media Bias Fact Check - China Global Television Network (CGTN)
  2. Tehran Times - See the difference: CGTN offers a credible alternative to biased Western media
  3. USCNP - Public Opinion Propaganda: Be Cautious of CGTN Surveys
  4. SAGE Journals - Seeking Truth in International TV News

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Cgtn is right about radio free Asia
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Cgtn is right about radio free Asia

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Cgtn is right about radio free Asia

Aug 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Western media is biased
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Western media is biased

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Western media is biased

Aug 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Western media is biased against China
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Western media is biased against China

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Western media is biased against China

Aug 6, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Wikipedia is biased towards pro-Palestinian propaganda and erases facts about Hamas.
Partially True

Fact Check: Wikipedia is biased towards pro-Palestinian propaganda and erases facts about Hamas.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Wikipedia is biased towards pro-Palestinian propaganda and erases facts about Hamas.

Jul 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: truthorfake is biased
Partially True

Fact Check: truthorfake is biased

Detailed fact-check analysis of: truthorfake is biased

Jul 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: this answer is biased "The claim that self-driving vehicles are dangerous and should not be allowed is partially true, as there are concerns about their safety and the technology is still evolving. While some sources highlight the potential safety benefits of automated vehicles, they also acknowledge that the safety advantages have not yet been proven and that human error remains a significant factor in traffic fatalities."
Partially True

Fact Check: this answer is biased "The claim that self-driving vehicles are dangerous and should not be allowed is partially true, as there are concerns about their safety and the technology is still evolving. While some sources highlight the potential safety benefits of automated vehicles, they also acknowledge that the safety advantages have not yet been proven and that human error remains a significant factor in traffic fatalities."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: this answer is biased "The claim that self-driving vehicles are dangerous and should not be allowed is partially true, as there are concerns about their safety and the technology is still evolving. While some sources highlight the potential safety benefits of automated vehicles, they also acknowledge that the safety advantages have not yet been proven and that human error remains a significant factor in traffic fatalities."

Jul 9, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Cgtn is biased | TruthOrFake Blog