TF
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: Brucella Ceti has been found in seven marine species since 2000.

Fact Check: Brucella Ceti has been found in seven marine species since 2000.

Published June 27, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✓
VERDICT
True

# Fact Check: "Brucella Ceti has been found in seven marine species since 2000." ## What We Know Brucella ceti is a bacterium that primarily infects ...

Fact Check: "Brucella Ceti has been found in seven marine species since 2000."

What We Know

Brucella ceti is a bacterium that primarily infects marine mammals, including various species of cetaceans. Research indicates that since 2000, Brucella ceti has been detected in multiple marine species, specifically in stranded dolphins and whales. A study published in the Journal of Wildlife Diseases reported that researchers identified Brucella ceti in seven different species of marine mammals, including striped dolphins and pygmy killer whales, between the years 2000 and 2024 (source-5). The study highlighted a significant prevalence of Brucella ceti among these species, with a notable percentage of infected individuals exhibiting severe health issues (source-1).

Analysis

The claim that Brucella ceti has been found in seven marine species since 2000 is substantiated by credible scientific research. The findings from the Journal of Wildlife Diseases provide direct evidence of the bacterium's presence across multiple species, confirming the claim. Furthermore, a comprehensive review of the genetic characteristics of Brucella ceti and Brucella pinnipedialis supports the understanding of their infection capabilities in marine mammals (source-2).

The reliability of the sources is high, as they come from peer-reviewed journals and reputable institutions, such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Center for Food Security and Public Health (CFSPH) (source-3, source-4). These sources provide a thorough overview of the impact of Brucella ceti on marine mammal populations and highlight the zoonotic potential of the bacterium, which is critical for understanding its implications for both wildlife and human health.

Conclusion

Verdict: True. The claim that Brucella ceti has been found in seven marine species since 2000 is supported by multiple credible studies and reports. The evidence indicates a significant presence of this pathogen in various marine mammals, confirming the accuracy of the claim.

Sources

  1. Detection of Brucella ceti and Brucella-Associated Disease in ... - PubMed Link
  2. Brucella ceti and Brucella pinnipedialis genome characterization unveil ... Link
  3. PDF Brucella Infection in Marine Mammals - National Oceanic and Atmospheric ... Link
  4. PDF Brucellosis in marine mammals - CFSPH Link
  5. UH researchers link dolphin strandings to infectious disease that can ... Link

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Brucella Ceti bacteria found in seven marine species since 2000.
Needs Research
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Brucella Ceti bacteria found in seven marine species since 2000.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Brucella Ceti bacteria found in seven marine species since 2000.

Jun 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Brucella Ceti found in seven marine species since 2000.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Brucella Ceti found in seven marine species since 2000.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Brucella Ceti found in seven marine species since 2000.

Jun 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Brucella Ceti infection can cause flu-like symptoms and chronic arthritis.
True

Fact Check: Brucella Ceti infection can cause flu-like symptoms and chronic arthritis.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Brucella Ceti infection can cause flu-like symptoms and chronic arthritis.

Jun 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Brucella Ceti infection can cause flu-like symptoms and chronic arthritis in humans.
True

Fact Check: Brucella Ceti infection can cause flu-like symptoms and chronic arthritis in humans.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Brucella Ceti infection can cause flu-like symptoms and chronic arthritis in humans.

Jun 27, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Brucella Ceti can cause flu-like symptoms and chronic arthritis in humans.
True

Fact Check: Brucella Ceti can cause flu-like symptoms and chronic arthritis in humans.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Brucella Ceti can cause flu-like symptoms and chronic arthritis in humans.

Jun 27, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks