TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake

Fact Check: #BREAKING - Limousine from Putin’s official fleet blows up near the FSB headquarters in Moscow. The vehicle, an Aurus limousine, belongs to the Kremlin’s Presidential Property Management Department.

Published March 29, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
?
VERDICT
Unverified

# The Claim: Limousine from Putin’s official fleet blows up near the FSB headquarters in Moscow On March 29, 2023, multiple reports emerged claiming ...

The Claim: Limousine from Putin’s official fleet blows up near the FSB headquarters in Moscow

On March 29, 2023, multiple reports emerged claiming that an Aurus limousine, believed to be part of Russian President Vladimir Putin's official car fleet, exploded near the FSB headquarters in Moscow. This incident has raised questions about the circumstances surrounding the explosion, including potential implications of security concerns and political tensions in Russia.

What We Know

  1. The Vehicle: The Aurus Senat is a luxury limousine that serves as the presidential state car of Russia. It was designed to reflect the retro style of the Soviet-era ZIS-110 and is known for its high cost and security features, with prices reported around $275,000 to $357,000 18.

  2. Incident Details: Reports indicate that the explosion occurred on a street just north of the FSB headquarters, a location significant for its association with Russian intelligence and security operations 27. The explosion was described as dramatic, with footage showing the vehicle engulfed in flames 46.

  3. Source of Claims: Various news outlets, including The Sun, Express, and Euro Weekly News, have reported on the incident, describing the vehicle as belonging to Putin's official fleet. However, these sources have varying degrees of reliability and potential biases 237.

  4. Context of the Incident: The explosion comes amid heightened security concerns and speculation about assassination attempts against political figures in Russia. This context may influence the interpretation of the event, suggesting it could be more than a mere accident 58.

Analysis

Source Reliability

  • Mainstream Media: Outlets like The Sun and Express are known for sensational reporting, which may affect the accuracy and objectivity of their coverage. While they provide immediate updates, their historical tendency to prioritize dramatic narratives over rigorous fact-checking raises questions about the reliability of their claims 23.

  • Specialized News Sources: Euro Weekly News and Sarajevo Times provide similar accounts but lack the depth of investigation that might be expected from more established news organizations. Their reports are consistent with the mainstream narrative but do not offer additional verification or context 57.

  • Social Media and User-Generated Content: A post from Jim Ferguson on X (formerly Twitter) provides a vivid description of the explosion but lacks independent verification. Social media can spread information quickly but often lacks the editorial oversight necessary for accurate reporting 10.

Methodology and Evidence

The reports primarily rely on eyewitness accounts and video footage of the explosion. However, the lack of official statements from Russian authorities or independent verification of the vehicle's ownership raises concerns about the accuracy of the claims. Additionally, the absence of detailed investigation into the cause of the explosion leaves room for speculation about whether it was an accident, sabotage, or a deliberate act.

Conflicts of Interest

Some sources may have inherent biases, particularly those that cater to specific political narratives or sensationalist reporting. This could influence their portrayal of the incident, potentially framing it within broader themes of instability or paranoia in Russian politics.

What Additional Information Would Be Helpful

To better understand the situation, further information would be beneficial, including:

  • Official Statements: Insights from Russian authorities or the Kremlin regarding the incident could clarify the circumstances and ownership of the vehicle.
  • Independent Verification: Reports from independent journalists or organizations specializing in Russian affairs could provide a more nuanced perspective.
  • Contextual Analysis: Examination of recent political events in Russia, particularly concerning security and potential threats to political figures, would help contextualize the explosion.

Conclusion

Verdict: Unverified

The claim that a limousine from Putin's official fleet exploded near the FSB headquarters remains unverified. Key evidence includes eyewitness accounts and video footage, but these sources lack independent verification and official confirmation regarding the vehicle's ownership. The reports come from various outlets with differing reliability, many of which have a history of sensationalism, raising further doubts about the accuracy of the claims.

The context of heightened security concerns in Russia adds complexity to the interpretation of the incident, suggesting potential implications beyond a simple accident. However, without official statements or thorough investigations, the true nature of the explosion remains unclear.

It is important to acknowledge the limitations in the available evidence, as the lack of corroborating information from credible sources leaves significant uncertainty. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate information and consider the reliability of sources when assessing claims of this nature.

Sources

  1. Aurus Senat. (n.d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurus_Senat
  2. Limo from 'Putin's car fleet' is blown up as troops searched ... The Sun. Retrieved from https://www.the-sun.com/news/13897148/putin-limo-exploded-fire-paranoid/
  3. Limo from Vladimir Putin's 'fleet' blown up in explosion. Express. Retrieved from https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/2034188/vladimir-putin-limo-fleet-explosion
  4. Limo from Putin's fleet explodes and catches fire in Moscow. MSN. Retrieved from https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/limo-from-putin-s-fleet-explodes-and-catches-fire-in-moscow-amid-assassination-paranoia/ar-AA1BTn5H
  5. Limousine explodes in Central Moscow: Does it belong to ... Sarajevo Times. Retrieved from https://sarajevotimes.com/limousine-explodes-in-central-moscow-does-it-belong-to-putins-fleet/
  6. Limo from Putin's fleet catches fire in Moscow amid ... The Express. Retrieved from https://www.the-express.com/news/world-news/167643/moment-limo-putins-fleet-fire
  7. Vladimir Putin limousine explosion. Euro Weekly News. Retrieved from https://euroweeklynews.com/2025/03/29/putins-limousine-ablaze-after-mysterious-explosion-in-moscow/
  8. Limo 'from Putin's car fleet' explodes as paranoia increases. Daily Star. Retrieved from https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/breaking-limo-from-putins-car-34955813
  9. Limo from Vladimir Putin's 'fleet' blown up in massive ... MSN. Retrieved from https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/limo-from-vladimir-putin-s-fleet-blown-up-in-massive-explosion/ar-AA1BTdGL
  10. Jim Ferguson - X. Retrieved from https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1906029030975103162

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Donny’s sent Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to ‘interview’ Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving twenty years in prison for trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein. wait, did I say Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche? I should have said Donny’s personal attorney Todd Blanche — because that’s what Todd was before Donny appointed him to the DOJ. how convenient, to have one’s own personal attorney running interference as the second-in-command at the DOJ. so Blanche is talking to Maxwell. here’s the adminstration’s official bullshit cover story, as dutifully stenographed by the worthless scribblers of The New York Times. The interview with Ms. Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking, is part of the department’s effort to quell criticism that it is concealing details of Mr. Epstein’s crimes and interactions with high-profile figures, including President Trump. oh, I see — they’re ‘quelling criticism.’ how in the holy name of fuck does that work? does anyone believe that justice is what this is about? if you do, I have five bankrupt casinos in Atlantic City to sell you. we all goddamn well know that Blanche is down there offering Ghislaine a deal. it’s probably something like ‘exonerate Donny. tell everyone he did nothing wrong, and Donny will pardon you on the spot.’ you’d be naive to think otherwise. because that’s how the most corrupt administration in the history of corruption rolls. it’s a fucking cover-up, is what it is. let’s go to Akaash Singh one more time: ‘they’re hiding something CRAZY.’

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: An official complaint has been filed against Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) for allegedly “SMURFING” $1.14 million dollars - splitting funds into 10k deposits using 714 STOLEN Senior IDs using the WinReds platform….
Unverified
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: An official complaint has been filed against Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) for allegedly “SMURFING” $1.14 million dollars - splitting funds into 10k deposits using 714 STOLEN Senior IDs using the WinReds platform….

Detailed fact-check analysis of: An official complaint has been filed against Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) for allegedly “SMURFING” $1.14 million dollars - splitting funds into 10k deposits using 714 STOLEN Senior IDs using the WinReds platform….

Aug 11, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Nearly 37 million Americans lived below the official poverty line in 2023. Another 38 million more would be in poverty if not for government aid like food stamps… $1.2 trillion spent annually on programs keeping them afloat.”
Partially True

Fact Check: Nearly 37 million Americans lived below the official poverty line in 2023. Another 38 million more would be in poverty if not for government aid like food stamps… $1.2 trillion spent annually on programs keeping them afloat.”

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Nearly 37 million Americans lived below the official poverty line in 2023. Another 38 million more would be in poverty if not for government aid like food stamps… $1.2 trillion spent annually on programs keeping them afloat.”

Aug 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: over 60% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, with little or no savings and under constant threat of financial collapse. Nearly 37 million Americans lived below the official poverty line in 2023.
Partially True

Fact Check: over 60% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, with little or no savings and under constant threat of financial collapse. Nearly 37 million Americans lived below the official poverty line in 2023.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: over 60% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, with little or no savings and under constant threat of financial collapse. Nearly 37 million Americans lived below the official poverty line in 2023.

Aug 10, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: DONALD TRUMP IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a "truckload" of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump's name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.
True

Fact Check: DONALD TRUMP IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a "truckload" of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump's name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: DONALD TRUMP IS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES When Justice Department officials reviewed what Attorney General Pam Bondi called a "truckload" of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein earlier this year, they discovered that Donald Trump's name appeared multiple times, according to senior administration officials.

Jul 26, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks