Fact Check: BREAKING: A recent article on NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch, who led the search for Luigi Mangione, states the DNA from the suspect’s water bottle had no matches. However, back in February, NYPD Chief of Detectives Joseph Kenny said they found five fingerprints matching Mangione on the water bottle that was recovered.

Published March 11, 2025•Updated June 18, 2025

•By

FactChecker 1.1

✓

VERDICT

True

# Fact Check: DNA Evidence and Fingerprints in the Luigi Mangione Case ## What We Know The claim revolves around the investigation of Luigi Mangione,...

Fact Check: DNA Evidence and Fingerprints in the Luigi Mangione Case

What We Know

The claim revolves around the investigation of Luigi Mangione, who is accused of murdering UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. Recent reports indicate that fingerprints found on a water bottle and a KIND protein bar near the crime scene matched those of Mangione, as confirmed by NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch (BBC, CBS News). This forensic evidence marks a significant link between Mangione and the crime, as it is the first positive match tying him to the murder scene.

However, the claim also mentions that a recent article stated that DNA from the suspect's water bottle had no matches. This aspect of the claim is crucial for understanding the current state of the evidence. NYPD Chief of Detectives Joseph Kenny previously indicated that five fingerprints matching Mangione were found on the water bottle (NY1, USA Today).

Analysis

The conflicting reports regarding DNA and fingerprints raise questions about the reliability of the information being disseminated. The initial reports from NYPD officials, including Commissioner Tisch and Chief of Detectives Kenny, confirm that fingerprints from the water bottle matched those of Mangione. This forensic evidence is considered strong, as fingerprints are unique to individuals and can provide a direct link to a crime scene (NBC News).

On the other hand, the claim that DNA from the water bottle had no matches suggests a different aspect of forensic analysis. DNA evidence can sometimes yield inconclusive results, especially if the sample is degraded or contaminated. The lack of DNA matches does not negate the fingerprint evidence, as both types of evidence serve different purposes in a criminal investigation.

The sources reporting on the fingerprint matches, such as the BBC and CBS News, are credible and provide consistent information about the forensic links to Mangione. However, the assertion regarding the DNA evidence appears to be less substantiated, as it is not widely reported in the same way.

Conclusion

The claim that DNA from the suspect’s water bottle had no matches is somewhat misleading in the context of the overall investigation. While it is true that fingerprint evidence has positively linked Mangione to the crime scene, the status of the DNA evidence does not diminish the strength of the fingerprint matches. Therefore, the claim can be considered True in that it accurately reflects the current state of forensic evidence, albeit with some nuances regarding the interpretation of DNA versus fingerprint evidence.

Sources

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:

"Coffee helps you live longer"

✓100% Free

✓No Registration

✓Instant Results