Fact Check: Brazil's oil production surpassed soybeans, becoming the top export last year.

Fact Check: Brazil's oil production surpassed soybeans, becoming the top export last year.

Published June 18, 2025
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: "Brazil's oil production surpassed soybeans, becoming the top export last year." ## What We Know The claim that "Brazil's oil productio...

Fact Check: "Brazil's oil production surpassed soybeans, becoming the top export last year."

What We Know

The claim that "Brazil's oil production surpassed soybeans, becoming the top export last year" is misleading. In 2023, Brazil's soybean exports reached a record of 3,744 million bushels, which was a 29% increase from the previous year, making soybeans the largest agricultural commodity exported by Brazil (source-1). In contrast, while oil exports have been increasing, they did not surpass soybeans in 2023. The 2023 export revenue from soybeans alone was approximately $53.2 billion, compared to oil, which had not yet reached the same level of revenue at that time (source-2).

However, projections indicate that in 2024, oil is expected to overtake soybeans as Brazil's top export product. Reports suggest that oil exports are on track to reach significant figures, potentially exceeding soybean exports by a narrow margin (source-5, source-7).

Analysis

The claim is evaluated based on the timeline of exports. In 2023, soybeans remained Brazil's top export, with record volumes and revenues. The assertion that oil has surpassed soybeans is based on projections for 2024, not on actual data from 2023. The sources discussing the future of oil exports (source-6, source-8) indicate a significant shift in export dynamics but do not support the claim for the previous year.

The reliability of the sources varies. The USDA Foreign Agricultural Service and the University of Illinois provide credible agricultural data and analyses, while articles discussing future projections may include speculative elements that require careful interpretation. The Brazilian Ministry of Development and other trade reports also provide valuable insights into export trends but should be considered in the context of ongoing changes in global markets.

Conclusion

Verdict: False. The claim that Brazil's oil production surpassed soybeans in 2023 is inaccurate. While oil exports are projected to overtake soybeans in 2024, actual data from 2023 confirms that soybeans remained Brazil's top export. The confusion arises from the distinction between current data and future projections.

Sources

  1. The United States, Brazil, and China Soybean Triangle
  2. Brazil: Oilseeds and Products Update - USDA Foreign Agricultural Service
  3. Brazil and China's Strong Ag Relationship: Opportunity or ...
  4. Brazilian grain exports: 2022-2023 - ANEC
  5. No soy or sugarcane! Brazil's largest exported product is oil, to the delight of Petrobras and other companies in the sector.
  6. Oil poised to overtake soybeans as Brazil's top export
  7. Brazil's Export Shakeup: Crude Oil Dethrones Soybeans in 2024
  8. Oil poised to overtake soybeans as Brazil's top export | Economy

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
100% Free
No Registration
Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

🔍
Partially True
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Detailed fact-check analysis of: There is no question Mark Carney is a brilliant business man and has a very impressive resume. But does he give a shit about you, and for that matter other Canadians? I didn't know anything about Mark Carney a couple of weeks ago and yesterday, I decided to do a little research project. This is what I discovered with about 1 hour of research. Lets take a bit of a dive in… Mark Carney is the UN special envoy on climate change pushing governments around the world to adopt “clean energy”. A great position, no? Interestingly, right up until he entered the Liberal leadership race, he also conveniently sat on the board of Brookfield Asset Management at the same time as he sat in this position with the UN. Brookfield owns $1 trillion in assets under management and many of their portfolios are across renewable power & infrastructure. Hmm, sounds a little conflicty? He has directly profited off of the shutting down and blocking of fossil fuel projects in Canada which he advised Canada to do (and other nations) while making sure so called “green energy” options are pushed and approved, which line his own pockets with green. One of Mark's acts as Chair of the board was to move the head office of Brookfield from Toronto to New York, because of the impending tariff war. Sounds like he has a lot of faith in his ability to put Canada first...and then he lied about the whole situation claiming that he was not chair when Brookfield moved. Maybe true, but he approved the move and voted for it at the first hint of tariffs from Trump, while he was still chair… Let’s look further at Mark’s role with Brookfield though. While he was doing all this “good work”, or rather making western governments do all this good work while he profits off of them, he was also directing Brookfield to act completely contrary environmentally when it suits the firm and their shareholders. While Brookfield manages green companies, they also acquire and invest in “dirty” fossil fuel projects and “carbon releasing” in other parts of the world. “One of Brookfield's collection of assets was 267,000 hectares in Brazil. producing soybeans, sugar, corn and cattle. between 2012 and 2021 Brookfield's subsidiaries deforested around 9,000 hectares on eight large farms in the Cerrado region of Brazil, a vast area bordering the Amazon rainforest. The report estimates that 600,000 tonnes of CO2 was emitted by deforesting these areas, the equivalent of 1.2 million flights from London to New York. A spokesperson for Brookfield said: "Brookfield made limited investments in Brazil's agriculture sector during the last decade. The decision to sell these businesses was taken several years ago because the fund they were held in was reaching the end of its life, and we therefore had an obligation to return capital to investors." Global Witness claims that this decision to sell clashes with public statements subsequently made by Mr. Carney as a global leader on climate policy, which call upon companies not to sell off climate-damaging assets, but to hold onto them and either clean them up or close them down”. - Ben King, BBC 15, Dec, 2022 They cut 9000 hectares of prime forest on the border of the Amazon to expand their GMO farming operations. Wow! How about the $16 billion acquisition of Inter Pipeline by Brookfield”? An oil pipeline, yes. Just two of the many "CO2 emitting" actions that Mark Carney has directed Brookfield on as Chair to the Board while he pushes green energy where it benefits his own books… A 2023 report on Brookfield by “Private Equity Climate Risks” paint a pretty bleak picture. "The combined current fossil fuel investments of Brookfield and Oaktree emit an estimated 159 million metric tons (mt) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. This is an order of magnitude more than the 11.8 million mt CO2e disclosed in Brookfield’s sustainability reports". So… will Carney be good for Canada? Well all of the above makes me think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing and let’s keep in mind he has been a close financial advisor to Trudeau since 2020. All of the great results of Trudeau’s tenure are the direct result of Carney. Doubling of house prices Record inflation Doubling of Canadians in the line of the food bank Our now crippling national debt and $60 billion deficit One of the biggest red flags for me is that Mark refuses to disclose his own personal financial situation. A guy who just a couple of months ago sat on 20 different corporate boards, including many American companies, promises he has a lot to gain by becoming PM. He is an ultra elite globalist who is 100% a part of the decisions that have led to Canada’s downfall and left us so vulnerable and if he remains as PM for any length of time, I feel Canada may end up bankrupt. The media will tell you that Mark is the guy to take on Trump, but the truth is not hard to uncover if you just do a little digging. Centrum

Mar 24, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Brazil's public health system, SUS, has 2.8 billion admissions per year.
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Brazil's public health system, SUS, has 2.8 billion admissions per year.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Brazil's public health system, SUS, has 2.8 billion admissions per year.

Jul 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Did Canada have tariffs on export of gas, oil or electricity to the US before 2025?
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Did Canada have tariffs on export of gas, oil or electricity to the US before 2025?

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Did Canada have tariffs on export of gas, oil or electricity to the US before 2025?

Jul 13, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: OPEC's production cuts significantly impact global oil prices.
True

Fact Check: OPEC's production cuts significantly impact global oil prices.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: OPEC's production cuts significantly impact global oil prices.

Jul 5, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Flaxseed oil or fish oil can raise ldl cholesterol
False

Fact Check: Flaxseed oil or fish oil can raise ldl cholesterol

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Flaxseed oil or fish oil can raise ldl cholesterol

Aug 16, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Flaxseed oil is not a good source of omega 3
False

Fact Check: Flaxseed oil is not a good source of omega 3

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Flaxseed oil is not a good source of omega 3

Aug 16, 2025
Read more →