Fact Check: "Brad Pitt's Los Angeles home ransacked by three burglars"
What We Know
On a recent Wednesday night, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) responded to a burglary at a home located on the 2300 block of North Edgemont Street in the Los Feliz neighborhood, which is reportedly owned by actor Brad Pitt. According to police reports, three suspects broke into the residence through a front window, ransacked the home, and fled with various stolen items (AP News) [source-1]. The LAPD has not confirmed the ownership of the home but noted that the address aligns with a property Pitt purchased for $5.5 million in April 2023 (BBC) [source-2]. At the time of the burglary, Pitt was out of the country promoting his new film, "F1," and was not present at the residence (Hollywood Reporter) [source-6].
Analysis
The claim that Brad Pitt's home was ransacked by three burglars is supported by multiple credible sources, including the LAPD and major news outlets like the BBC and AP News. The police confirmed the break-in and provided details about the suspects and the method of entry (AP News) [source-1]. However, it is important to note that while the address matches Pitt's property, the LAPD did not explicitly confirm his ownership of the home (BBC) [source-2). This lack of confirmation raises questions about the accuracy of the claim regarding ownership.
The reports indicate that the suspects managed to escape with stolen items, although the specific items taken have not been disclosed (Hollywood Reporter) [source-6]. The incident is part of a broader trend of celebrity-targeted burglaries in Los Angeles, which adds context to the significance of the event (BBC) [source-2].
Overall, while the primary details of the burglary are corroborated by reliable sources, the uncertainty surrounding the ownership of the home introduces a degree of ambiguity.
Conclusion
Verdict: Partially True
The claim that Brad Pitt's home was ransacked by three burglars is largely accurate, as police confirmed the incident and provided details about the break-in. However, the assertion that the home belongs to Pitt remains unverified by the LAPD, which means the claim is not entirely conclusive. Thus, while the event occurred as described, the ownership aspect of the claim is less certain.
