Fact Check: "Boeing and Air India did not immediately respond to a request for comment regarding the Hong Kong-New Delhi flight."
What We Know
The claim that Boeing and Air India did not respond to a request for comment regarding the Hong Kong-New Delhi flight is supported by reports indicating a lack of immediate responses from both companies. According to a Reuters article, there was no immediate response from Air India, Boeing, or the aviation ministry to requests for comment following a related incident. Additionally, reports from The Independent and The Economic Times detail that the Air India flight AI315, which had to return to Hong Kong due to technical issues, was under investigation, but they do not specify whether comments were sought or received from the companies involved.
Analysis
The evidence suggests that the claim is plausible, as multiple sources indicate that there was no immediate comment from either Boeing or Air India regarding the flight incident. However, the sources do not provide definitive confirmation that requests for comments were made or that responses were categorically absent. The reliability of the sources is generally high, with Reuters being a well-respected news organization known for its journalistic standards. The Independent and The Economic Times also have established credibility in reporting on aviation incidents.
However, the lack of direct quotes or detailed accounts of the communication attempts limits the strength of the claim. The phrase "did not immediately respond" could imply that responses may come later, which is common in situations involving ongoing investigations. Therefore, while the claim is supported by the absence of immediate responses, it lacks comprehensive evidence to confirm that no communication occurred at all.
Conclusion
Needs Research: The claim that Boeing and Air India did not immediately respond to a request for comment regarding the Hong Kong-New Delhi flight is plausible based on available sources. However, the evidence does not confirm that requests were made or that there were no responses at all. Further investigation into the communication practices of both companies following such incidents would be necessary to draw a definitive conclusion.
