TruthOrFake Logo
TruthOrFake
Fact Check: BLM donations went to democrats in 2020

Fact Check: BLM donations went to democrats in 2020

Published March 12, 2025•Updated June 18, 2025
ByFactChecker 1.1 avatarFactChecker 1.1
✗
VERDICT
False

# Fact Check: "BLM donations went to democrats in 2020" ## What We Know The claim that donations made to Black Lives Matter (BLM) during 2020 went di...

Fact Check: "BLM donations went to democrats in 2020"

What We Know

The claim that donations made to Black Lives Matter (BLM) during 2020 went directly to Democratic candidates is misleading. The BLM organization utilizes ActBlue, a fundraising platform that primarily supports Democratic causes, to process its donations. However, according to the Associated Press, donations made through the BLM website are earmarked specifically for BLM and do not automatically funnel into Democratic Party campaigns. ActBlue itself confirmed that donations are directed to the specified organization, not to political candidates unless explicitly stated by the donor.

During the surge of donations following the protests in 2020, ActBlue processed over $60 million in contributions, with a significant portion going to various charitable causes and organizations, including BLM (New York Times). While ActBlue is known for its association with Democratic fundraising, it does not mean that all donations made through it are directed to the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The DNC clarified that it only receives funds if donations are explicitly made to them through ActBlue (FactCheck.org).

Analysis

The assertion that BLM donations went to Democrats relies heavily on the connection between BLM and ActBlue. While it is true that ActBlue is a platform favored by Democratic candidates, the claim fails to recognize the specific purpose of the donations made through the BLM website. As noted by the Center for Responsive Politics, donations to BLM are intended for the organization itself, which aims to address issues like state-sanctioned violence and systemic racism.

Moreover, the narrative that BLM donations are a means of funding the Democratic Party has been debunked by multiple sources, including the AP and CBS8. These outlets emphasize that the funds raised are directed to BLM's initiatives rather than being funneled into political campaigns. The spread of this misinformation has been amplified by social media, often without proper context or verification, leading to a misunderstanding of how the fundraising process works.

The reliability of the sources debunking this claim is strong, as they include established news organizations and fact-checking entities. The AP and FactCheck.org are reputable sources known for their commitment to factual reporting and thorough investigations.

Conclusion

The claim that "BLM donations went to democrats in 2020" is False. While BLM does use ActBlue for processing donations, these funds are specifically allocated to the organization and its causes, not to Democratic candidates or the DNC. The narrative suggesting otherwise misrepresents the donation process and fails to acknowledge the intended use of the funds.

Sources

  1. Protests Spur Surge in Donations, Giving ActBlue Its ...
  2. Black Lives Matter and Other Groups Flooded With Millions in Donations ...
  3. Link on Black Lives Matter website does not donate directly to DNC
  4. Donations to Black Lives Matter Group Don't Go to DNC
  5. Fact-check: Do donations to Black Lives Matter go to a 'Democrat Super PAC'?
  6. VERIFY: Do Black Lives Matter donations go to democratic campaigns?
  7. Black Lives Matter PAC Contributions to Federal Candidates
  8. Record cash floods Democrats, Black groups amid protests and ... - POLITICO

Have a claim you want to verify? It's 100% Free!

Our AI-powered fact-checker analyzes claims against thousands of reliable sources and provides evidence-based verdicts in seconds. Completely free with no registration required.

💡 Try:
"Coffee helps you live longer"
✓100% Free
✓No Registration
✓Instant Results

Comments

Leave a comment

Loading comments...

More Fact Checks to Explore

Discover similar claims and stay informed with these related fact-checks

Fact Check: is jew went on a economic war with hitler before the war
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: is jew went on a economic war with hitler before the war

Detailed fact-check analysis of: is jew went on a economic war with hitler before the war

Aug 1, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: "BREAKING: Beyoncé cloned by Illuminati after real one went rogue. Proof is in her weird Grammys performance."
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: "BREAKING: Beyoncé cloned by Illuminati after real one went rogue. Proof is in her weird Grammys performance."

Detailed fact-check analysis of: "BREAKING: Beyoncé cloned by Illuminati after real one went rogue. Proof is in her weird Grammys performance."

Jul 29, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that
False
🎯 Similar

Fact Check: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Detailed fact-check analysis of: Transcript 00:00 911 was a false flag. For the first 10 years, I did not think anything other than the official narrative then after being shown a video, a close up video of building number seven coming down and that got me going because it's obvious to me that building seven was was a controlled demolition because the building collapses from the bottom down. The trade centers were unique in that they were designed to withstand the 00:33 impact of a a a jet. From what I understand the the outer skeleton of the building. The outer columns was like a a fish net and you had these inner core columns which was substantial thick steel beams to withstand four or five times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always over design a building. No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 9/ eleven. So that should say something right there. And it said that building seven it was 01:05 aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire but progressive collapse unlike the twin towers, the twin towers collapse from the top down. That's a progressive collapse. Sure. Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building seven collapsing, it collapses uniformly, it's collapsing from the bottom, the building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly which the video show all the load bearing it would have to have failed 01:36 simultaneously. Now, fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers and if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked. One on top of each other. The stoves up at the top. Yes, there's fire and they've been damaged but the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay. So, the structure underneath all of that is intact. So, it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase. Without a 02:07 controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I something else is going on. I don't believe that it was just the planes or the fires I think that and they examine the dust and they found what they call thermitic material which is like a explosive incendiary which was in the dust samples and that's documented. There were reports of the buildings were undergoing a extensive elevator renovation in the two or three years prior to all kinds of 02:40 workers they had access to the the core the cores of the building and on the day of the attack the the elevator company would not assist in the operations of the elevators and the elevator company was the elevator company it subsequently went out of business and a couple of years after that

Jul 28, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: George Soros and the Open Society Foundations (OSF): They have been the leading donors to the Democratic Party over the past 15+ years. They have been the leading funders behind Black Lives Matter (BLM) and Antifa "terrorist riots." They have funded campaigns of dozens of corrupt judges, District Attorneys (DAs), and Attorneys General (AGs). Soros has publicly stated his intention to dismantle the American constitutional republic. The Democratic Party is aligned with this anti-American agenda.
Partially True

Fact Check: George Soros and the Open Society Foundations (OSF): They have been the leading donors to the Democratic Party over the past 15+ years. They have been the leading funders behind Black Lives Matter (BLM) and Antifa "terrorist riots." They have funded campaigns of dozens of corrupt judges, District Attorneys (DAs), and Attorneys General (AGs). Soros has publicly stated his intention to dismantle the American constitutional republic. The Democratic Party is aligned with this anti-American agenda.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: George Soros and the Open Society Foundations (OSF): They have been the leading donors to the Democratic Party over the past 15+ years. They have been the leading funders behind Black Lives Matter (BLM) and Antifa "terrorist riots." They have funded campaigns of dozens of corrupt judges, District Attorneys (DAs), and Attorneys General (AGs). Soros has publicly stated his intention to dismantle the American constitutional republic. The Democratic Party is aligned with this anti-American agenda.

Aug 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: trump said Sanctuary cities are protecting criminals, not communities. Nearly 70% of criminals arrested in Washington went unprosecuted in 2022, that ends here.
Partially True

Fact Check: trump said Sanctuary cities are protecting criminals, not communities. Nearly 70% of criminals arrested in Washington went unprosecuted in 2022, that ends here.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: trump said Sanctuary cities are protecting criminals, not communities. Nearly 70% of criminals arrested in Washington went unprosecuted in 2022, that ends here.

Aug 18, 2025
Read more →
Fact Check: More than $100 million was raised at the celebrity "Fire Aid" concert. That money was supposed to go to victims of the Pacific Palisades fires. Instead, all of the money went to non-profit organizations.
Partially True

Fact Check: More than $100 million was raised at the celebrity "Fire Aid" concert. That money was supposed to go to victims of the Pacific Palisades fires. Instead, all of the money went to non-profit organizations.

Detailed fact-check analysis of: More than $100 million was raised at the celebrity "Fire Aid" concert. That money was supposed to go to victims of the Pacific Palisades fires. Instead, all of the money went to non-profit organizations.

Jul 31, 2025
Read more →
Explore All Fact Checks