Fact Check: "Biological males competing in women's sports is a violation of Title IX."
What We Know
The claim that biological males competing in women's sports violates Title IX is supported by recent legislative and executive actions. The Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025 explicitly states that it is a violation of Title IX for federally funded education programs to allow individuals whose biological sex at birth was male to participate in programs designated for women or girls (source). This aligns with the broader interpretation of Title IX, which prohibits discrimination based on sex in educational settings, including sports.
Furthermore, an executive order titled Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports reinforces this stance by declaring that allowing biological males to compete in women's sports is "demeaning, unfair, and dangerous" and denies women and girls equal opportunities in athletics (source). The order emphasizes the need to uphold biological definitions of sex in sports to ensure fairness and safety for female athletes.
Analysis
The evidence supporting the claim is rooted in both legislative and executive actions that reflect a growing concern over the participation of biological males in women's sports. The Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025 has passed the House and outlines clear prohibitions against such participation, reinforcing the interpretation of Title IX as it relates to sex-based discrimination in athletics (source, source).
The executive order from the White House further underscores this position, stating that ignoring biological differences undermines the opportunities for women and girls in sports (source). This order has been framed within the context of protecting women's rights and ensuring fair competition, which has been echoed in various court cases and legal interpretations, such as the Tennessee v. Cardona case, which recognized the importance of biological truths in educational access (source).
However, it is important to note that the interpretation of Title IX and the implications of these legislative actions are subject to ongoing legal challenges and debates. Some critics argue that these measures may infringe upon the rights of transgender individuals, leading to a complex legal landscape that is still evolving. The reliability of the sources, primarily governmental and legislative documents, lends credibility to the claim, though the political context may introduce bias in the framing of the issue.
Conclusion
The claim that biological males competing in women's sports is a violation of Title IX is True. This conclusion is based on the explicit language of the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025, which directly states that allowing biological males to compete in women's sports constitutes a violation of Title IX. Additionally, the executive order from the White House supports this interpretation, emphasizing the need to protect women's sports from perceived unfair competition.
Sources
- Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports
- Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2025 119th Congress
- U.S. Department of Education Announces the University of Pennsylvania Has Entered Resolution Agreement
- Text - H.R.28 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act
- Trump admin sues California after civil rights probe faulted state for allowing males in girls sports
- California Defies Federal Civil Rights Order, Risks Billions
- Trump administration sues California to bar biological males from girls' sports
- Trump administration sues California for allowing men to compete on womenβs sports teams